DS 168 vs. 161
Moderator: jiayi
DS 168 vs. 161
I understand that the 161 cm is a slightly older model than the 168, but apart from that and the obvious differences in appearance - are there any pros to the 168 model over the 161, like more advanced skeleton, more and better sculpt of the body/skin, better inserts or anything at all? Based on the pictures I´ve seen the 160 an 158 model is not an option for me.
- haremlover
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 16238
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: UK and South of France
- Contact:
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
A friend has a 161 about "whom" he raves
It does of course depend on the priority of what you want her for - companionship, photography and fashion model or sex. As fashion model 168 is great and particularly if you're working with short focus lens in a more confined space than larger studios or outside will allow.
Best wishes
Harem
Chloé's book
is available from The-Doll-House
- - - -
Here's Coverdoll Yolanda
- - - -
Reviews for:
-DS-OR-JY-SY-Jarliet-Vivid-SM-SE-ZOne-JM-Sino-Sanhui-Pipedream--XY-WM-Elsa Babe-SM Silicone Siliko-XYcolo-Starpery-Elsa Babe-FutureDoll-Zelex-Irontech-FJ Doll
- - - -
YouTube Doll Review Channel
-https://www.youtube.com/@sexdoll-reviews-
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
- haremlover
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 16238
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: UK and South of France
- Contact:
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
The problem seems to be in part that DS are constantly working at a breathtaking pace and one can't predict what luscious doll they're going to bring out next . . . and you're right in noticing current publicity being rather quiet on the 161 - possibly indicating that being possibly where one might see something.
However, looking at the thighs of the 158plus, of current models, she's possibly the one I'd go for.
Something I find both great and awkward about the most advanced skeleton is the facility of foot rotation. Much less cumbersome for posing but when carrying her upright, when a foot catches on one's legs in walking, it then catches more and rotates more.
But all of them are really great dolls.
Best wishes
Harem
Chloé's book
is available from The-Doll-House
- - - -
Here's Coverdoll Yolanda
- - - -
Reviews for:
-DS-OR-JY-SY-Jarliet-Vivid-SM-SE-ZOne-JM-Sino-Sanhui-Pipedream--XY-WM-Elsa Babe-SM Silicone Siliko-XYcolo-Starpery-Elsa Babe-FutureDoll-Zelex-Irontech-FJ Doll
- - - -
YouTube Doll Review Channel
-https://www.youtube.com/@sexdoll-reviews-
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
- haremlover
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 16238
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: UK and South of France
- Contact:
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
The 168 anal function is only a few inches deep and there's a photo of one for sale some time ago somewhere probably here where enthusiastic use had left the hole looking less than pretty. So it's possibly better to focus on an area with a removable and replaceable insert . . .lsywain wrote:161 doesn't have the anal function, which is quite a problem to me aha.
Best wishes
Harem
Chloé's book
is available from The-Doll-House
- - - -
Here's Coverdoll Yolanda
- - - -
Reviews for:
-DS-OR-JY-SY-Jarliet-Vivid-SM-SE-ZOne-JM-Sino-Sanhui-Pipedream--XY-WM-Elsa Babe-SM Silicone Siliko-XYcolo-Starpery-Elsa Babe-FutureDoll-Zelex-Irontech-FJ Doll
- - - -
YouTube Doll Review Channel
-https://www.youtube.com/@sexdoll-reviews-
Re: DS 168 vs. 161
I don´t think DS themselves encourage anal activity on these, I think I read that too somewhere. I´m guessing it´s more a visual feature? It does add to the realism tho, and a definite plus - but not a dealbreaker IMO.haremlover wrote:The 168 anal function is only a few inches deep and there's a photo of one for sale some time ago somewhere probably here where enthusiastic use had left the hole looking less than pretty. So it's possibly better to focus on an area with a removable and replaceable insert . . .lsywain wrote:161 doesn't have the anal function, which is quite a problem to me aha.
Best wishes
Harem