LaDollyVita,LaDollyVita wrote:You think Doll Sweet will not consider making a larger doll because of ethnic group mating preferences? I would have accepted an answer about market economics not justifying the investment as you initially hinted, but nobody is questioning why Doll Sweet makes dolls catered to their home market.Rick_Deckard wrote:Simple, ethnic groups tends to have a preference in mating inside the same ethnic groups, this includes the concept of "desirable mates" and since we're talking about sex dolls...you may like it or not but that's undeniably the truth.
No, spot on. Your original post missed that we already agreed on this back on Page 1. Bear in mind that DS is not being criticized here, nor are their design choices being debated. Rocket88 and I are simply confirming that amongst Western men, at least, there is a growing demand for a larger doll from DS. It's a compliment to how nice a doll they already build! Now we just want a bigger one to match our "ethnic group mating preferences".Rick_Deckard wrote:I may be wrong, of course...
I accept your point on the matter. You are implying that more DS customers likely care about weight, than who care about a Western sized doll. No argument from me there. All my discourse in this thread is to say that I would purchase a heavier doll that was sized to my preferences. So would Rocket88. We aren't arguing that DS made bad choices, or that they shouldn't cater to the Asian market. Some of us just want another DS option. Cut us some slack!anataus wrote:if the 30 kg 158 doll were 168 tall, she should be 37-38 kg... uhm in my opinion DS made correct choices, of course you can not please everybody
I too wish they had more options in the 25-28 year old range. The recent mature heads they produced were markedly older than I was hoping.anataus wrote:I would like to have 25 year old girl faces.
Excellent......Everything very, very well said........
Rocket88