DS doll 170cm doll play BDSM video

jazzman · Post by **jazzman** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:49 am

my thoughts exactly. WTH are they thinking representing their company like this.....I had wanted the April and Thera heads in advance of planning which body to buy. Now, I will forget about them. I don't want to buy from any company who portrays females as objects of ridicule and domination.

blindwebster wrote:It's nothing against DS, as I think they are phenomenal dolls and would love one. I just cannot stand seeing women tied up like that. I prefer seeing beautiful poses in gorgeous environments. As far as erotica in general goes, I prefer seeing sexy 'please fuck me, baby' shots. Not all of this domination type shit.

Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:41 am

please allow we explain:

as our character design, she is not been torturing.
her name is "JiuXi Lee", she is CPRO of our company at day time, but when Night Falls,
she have this hobby, by being tied up the way to release pressure and get happy.

I didn't post the story, because it is hard translate in English. hope this will not make some misunderstanding.

blindwebster · Post by **blindwebster** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:49 am

Doll Sweet wrote:please allow we explain:

as our character design, she is not been torturing.
her name is "JiuXi Lee", she is CPRO of our company at day time, but when Night Falls,
she have this hobby, by being tied up the way to release pressure and get happy.

I didn't post the story, because it is hard translate in English. hope this will not make some misunderstanding.

Anyway, I look forward to some footage showcasing the doll posing in more natural environments. As you have an incredible creation here.

cucky · Post by **cucky** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:51 am

Doll Sweet wrote:........hope this will not make some misunderstanding.

I love it !!!

This video is showing the birth of ART , you don´t need to justify it .

Peter

Wunderlust · Post by **Wunderlust** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:01 pm

BDSM isn't about tour torture, it's about control for both. I don't find it nearly as exciting as my girlfriend does. She loves it. She is the one that asked me to do it.

wjq1017 · Post by **wjq1017** » Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:14 pm

the video was removed...TAT

sture · Post by **sture** » Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:14 pm

Doll Sweet wrote:please allow we explain:

as our character design, she is not been torturing.
her name is "JiuXi Lee", she is CPRO of our company at day time, but when Night Falls,
she have this hobby, by being tied up the way to release pressure and get happy.

I didn't post the story, because it is hard translate in English. hope this will not make some misunderstanding.

stacy718 · Post by **stacy718** » Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:29 pm

blindwebster wrote:The 170 is amazing in every way, but I can't say I am a fan of seeing a woman tied up like that. In fact, I find it repulsive. Just make a video showcasing the body, poses and movement. Please.

Why?

It's erotic and when done, it's with someone you trust. Because of judgment, I can't enjoy the video!!!! Boo!

rubyfan · Post by **rubyfan** » Mon Feb 08, 2016 1:56 pm

stacy718 wrote:
blindwebster wrote:The 170 is amazing in every way, but I can't say I am a fan of seeing a woman tied up like that. In fact, I find it repulsive. Just make a video showcasing the body, poses and movement. Please.
Why?

It's erotic and when done, it's with someone you trust. Because of judgment, I can't enjoy the video!!!! Boo!

Agreed. The taking down of this video in deference to the sensitivities of a couple of blue-noses is disappointing. This sort of crap is exactly why we're unlikely to see the kind of advancements we'd all like in love doll technology any time soon. Major corporations will always fold the moment a couple of loud-mouths start shrieking about the moral outrage of selling something sexual to adults that find it appealing. It's why the world today is filled with blood-soaked, bullet and bomb-riddled, guts-and-gore TV, movies and video game spectacles while sex has to be hidden behind gauze when it isn't entirely consigned to a cultural ghetto like a filthy, unmentionable secret.

'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' was a huge cultural event and smash hit. How many complaints did you hear over the on-screen depiction of an entire planet full of people being incinerated? Of watching them staring up in horror at the sky at the moment of their deaths? Contrast that with how much of an outrage there would have been if a single female nipple had been shown in the film.

Don't talk to me about sociopaths, this entire society is sociopathic when it comes to loving depictions of violence and hating depictions of sex.

sture · Post by **sture** » Mon Feb 08, 2016 2:42 pm

rubyfan wrote:

Don't talk to me about sociopaths, this entire society is sociopathic when it comes to loving depictions of violence and hating depictions of sex.

"We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party.
There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy.
There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent there will be no need of science.
There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life.
All competing pleasures will be destroyed.
But always—do not forget this Winston—always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler.
Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever."

- George Orwell/ 1984 -

blindwebster · Post by **blindwebster** » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:11 am

stacy718 wrote:
blindwebster wrote:The 170 is amazing in every way, but I can't say I am a fan of seeing a woman tied up like that. In fact, I find it repulsive. Just make a video showcasing the body, poses and movement. Please.

Why?

It's erotic and when done, it's with someone you trust. Because of judgment, I can't enjoy the video!!!! Boo!

I never asked for it to be removed, Stacy. I even said in another thread that I have no problem ignoring it and moving on. I just prefer a different brand of eroticism and beauty is all. I was just voicing my opinion, but I guess 'boo' me for having one, lol.

jonn · Post by **jonn** » Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:47 pm

rubyfan wrote:Agreed. The taking down of this video in deference to the sensitivities of a couple of blue-noses is disappointing.

I agree too. I would have thought everyone would be more open minded and accepting around here of all places. But (very) negative things were said and that is bad PR. Can't blame DS for taking it down.