Cozy closet: compare DS163 and DS145- up close

Ddwyerstar · Post by **Ddwyerstar** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:05 pm

I recently purchased a DS145- to add to my harem and according to the pics on the DS website they look quite similar, but I see up close they are quite different. Besides the weight issue which is substantial, I find the body shape has many subtitle differences as well as the obvious. First of all, I find the vagina on the 145- is substantially smaller and shallower. I find I prefer the 163 easily over the 145 for actual sex though the 145 is much easier to manipulate into new positions. I have the new softer silicone inserts which are very lifelike. The 163 though only a half a foot taller, the legs and torso seem much longer,the feel of picking up the 145 by the waist is easy while the 163 must be cradled like a baby to lift her. The 145 is considerably smaller in all aspects and does seem a little more delicate. If one can deal with the weight of the 163, I would recommend purchasing a 163. But the one advantage the 145- has that a can't get over is that cute little bubble butt, it is amazing, I couldn't stop squeezing it, lol. The breasts on the 163 we're softer and more realistic, indistinguishable from real breasts I would say. I hope these comments will help new buyers choose between the two. I am adding some pictures of the two in hanging mode in their closet.

samara78 · Post by **samara78** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:08 pm

Great comparison of the 2.

jtkindred · Post by **jtkindred** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:12 pm

A sandwich waiting to be made, just add your meat!

2 very beautiful ladies!

SiliconeWorld · Post by **SiliconeWorld** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:49 pm

Great comparison ! Side-by-side pictures are awesome. Also the BEST means to show the differences ( no matter how subtle)

Thinking I need to get more closet space to hopefully fill up with beautiful "ladies" like these.

AGL · Post by **AGL** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:13 pm

Wow, great comparison shots - you've really got two beauties there!

I've got a 145 on order, as while I liked the 163, the allure of a very petite & light doll was just too much to pass up. I was just worried that she'd be much smaller than the 163 in the distance from mouth to insert, as I really like kissing my dolls during sex. I'm glad to see that they aren't dramatically different in that regard, judging by the pics where they're both lined up at about the same height anyway. It looks like the legs are where the majority of the difference is.

You're right too, that ass on the 145 does look very shapely & squeezable. Too bad about the insert being shallower though.

Ddwyerstar · Post by **Ddwyerstar** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:16 pm

Here's a couple more of that cute little bubble butt

Quietowlhawk · Post by **Quietowlhawk** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:57 pm

INTJonny · Post by **INTJonny** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:59 pm

thank you for those pics....thank you....thank you.

I got hooked the moment the words "squeeze bubble butt" was mentioned.

man....a DS harem is inevitable....I'm on the way there.

Post by **RaDiv** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:17 pm

Thanks for the comparison shots!

The 163 has for some reason never pushed my buttons. The 145 was love at first sight. If I was a cartoon character you would probably see steam bursting out of my ears.

Aber · Post by **Aber** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:49 pm

I have a 145 plus with 20cm inserts. How long are the shallow inserts?

Ddwyerstar · Post by **Ddwyerstar** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:27 pm

Looks like they are 14 cm, website says they will fit up to 20 cm, I'll get to ordering a couple 20s if available, the diameter is also smaller by 30%. To me there is a huge difference in the way the two feel.

DarkOne · Post by **DarkOne** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:53 pm

Nice. One thing I can't really tell though is mouth to vagina distance (Important for kissing missionary during sex)

In some pictures it looks like the 145 is a lot shorter, but others they nearly match up?

Any chance of busting out the tape measure and giving us a definitive comparison? (No need for extra pics, just tell us what the tape measure reads)

deadpringle · Post by **deadpringle** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:33 pm

LOL is it wrong that I can instantly recognize the 145 butt?

Ddwyerstar · Post by **Ddwyerstar** » Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:56 am

DarkOne wrote:Nice. One thing I can't really tell though is mouth to vagina distance (Important for kissing missionary during sex)

In some pictures it looks like the 145 is a lot shorter, but others they nearly match up?

Any chance of busting out the tape measure and giving us a definitive comparison? (No need for extra pics, just tell us what the tape measure reads)

The distance between the vagina and mouth on a 163 is 24 inches and the 145 is 21 inches.
Below is a comparison of vagina inserts