145 no longer on US site?

Walley · Post by **Walley** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:35 pm

The 15 inch flashlight must have broken the you can't own a flashlight bigger than 10 inch law. Not sure what law the $30 car head light broke. That is the problem with the government making up all these dumb laws we don't know which ones we are breaking. Using their own logic most porn mags only have 11 to 24 inch tall women in them, which can mean only one thing. Maybe that was the real reason Playboy dropped the nudity from their magazine.

DarkOne · Post by **DarkOne** » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:54 pm

Walley wrote:The 15 inch flashlight must have broken the you can't own a flashlight bigger than 10 inch law. Not sure what law the $30 car head light broke. That is the problem with the government making up all these dumb laws we don't know which ones we are breaking. Using their own logic most porn mags only have 11 to 24 inch tall women in them, which can mean only one thing. Maybe that was the real reason Playboy dropped the nudity from their magazine.

that sounds like the intro to a cheesy porn. "Hey ms officer, Wanna see my.. 15" flashlight?" "Ohh you know you can't own one bigger then 10" "mmm I know, its a.. deadly weapon." "im going to have to.. arrest you for that!"

Billyboob · Post by **Billyboob** » Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:37 am

Who needs a lead pipe when there's big metal d-cell flashlights

it's a weapon law

Billyboob · Post by **Billyboob** » Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:38 pm

After a year on and off the forums, debating
I got trigger itch & orderd a DS145- ying on 07/21 in fear I wouldn't be able to soon

She's coming to Canada so I'm hoping she will have a safe trip, the head is coming separate

The only thing I wish I noticed was how shallow the hole is, when I sent a email I was told it's to late to change (5days after ordering) to switch to the bigger option

Now I'm thinking I'll have to modify something that's not even complete and I don't even have yet, Just so i can fully enjoy her

I sent another email asking if there was any way they could modify her and give me the bigger inserts and I'm still waiting for a response

Billyboob · Post by **Billyboob** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:25 am

I got a email back from DS, he said my 145- body was already to far complete to change and it wasn't possible but if I didn't mind waiting they could make new one with the bigger inserts.. So I decided to it will be worth the extra wait..
I'm glad I went with DS for my 1st doll there customer support has been awsome thanks to John

kabuki · Post by **kabuki** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:53 pm

I'm looking forward to seeing the updated faces and body. Any news?

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:10 pm

Obin wrote:Reports are rolling in. Today's report showing on 23 July 2016, http://www.forfeiture.gov/pdf/CBP/Offic ... cation.pdf - shows a sad report on the second result for search entry of usc1305

I saved the file to my computer since it updates, I think, daily.

There are currently four results for the search of sex doll. All have this.

At the port of LOUISVILLE, KY

It's interesting that all but one are valued at $0.

hollows+fentiman · Post by **hollows+fentiman** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:14 pm

I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:21 pm

hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.

Put clothing on them. Just dress the dolls. A dressed doll isn't even nude. I thought of that after reading about nudity. Darkone thought of it after viewing dressed dolls at a shop. It just makes sense for a number of reasons.

cy_xander · Post by **cy_xander** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 7:45 pm

Obin wrote:
hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.
Put clothing on them. Just dress the dolls. A dressed doll isn't even nude. I thought of that after reading about nudity. Darkone thought of it after viewing dressed dolls at a shop. It just makes sense for a number of reasons.

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Fri Aug 12, 2016 8:58 pm

cy_xander wrote:
Obin wrote:
hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.
Put clothing on them. Just dress the dolls. A dressed doll isn't even nude. I thought of that after reading about nudity. Darkone thought of it after viewing dressed dolls at a shop. It just makes sense for a number of reasons.

Funny video.

If a doll has to be undressed to be naked, then it isn't naked. I don't think a doll that appears to be prepared for a camping trip could be considered obscene.

It appears that avoidance of the port of LOUISVILLE, KY might be a good idea.

anataus · Post by **anataus** » Sat Aug 13, 2016 7:05 am

hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.

It is a shame, in my opinion DS Dolls need a ,let's say, 1.52 / 21kg doll
The 1.45 is too small while the 1.60 26 kg can be too heavy for many people
Also the boobs of the 145+ are not realistic, see the WM or the OR doll, same size

nasty_ · Post by **nasty_** » Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:01 pm

anataus wrote:
hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.
It is a shame, in my opinion DS Dolls need a ,let's say, 1.52 / 21kg doll
The 1.45 is too small while the 1.60 26 kg can be too heavy for many people
Also the boobs of the 145+ are not realistic, see the WM or the OR doll, same size

The 145cm is sophisticated if you compare it to other dolls on market. She is not too heavy, other silicone dolls or TPE dolls (e.g. WM) are heavier.
The boobs are for sure not absolutely realistic because it's the + version. If you don't like it maybe you could for a - version.

Cheers

hollows+fentiman · Post by **hollows+fentiman** » Sat Aug 13, 2016 6:09 pm

The 145 minus and mid range are only 18kg but the plus comes in about 2kg heavier....... big tits!

anataus · Post by **anataus** » Sun Aug 14, 2016 5:30 pm

nasty_ wrote:
anataus wrote:
hollows+fentiman wrote:I heard from John at DS in China a few days ago that they are doing no modifications to the body or skeleton but are doing modifications to makeup to make them look more mature.
It is a shame, in my opinion DS Dolls need a ,let's say, 1.52 / 21kg doll
The 1.45 is too small while the 1.60 26 kg can be too heavy for many people
Also the boobs of the 145+ are not realistic, see the WM or the OR doll, same size
The 145cm is sophisticated if you compare it to other dolls on market. She is not too heavy, other silicone dolls or TPE dolls (e.g. WM) are heavier.
The boobs are for sure not absolutely realistic because it's the + version. If you don't like it maybe you could for a - version.

Cheers

I said that the 160 is too heavy not the 145, the 145 is too small, something between the 145 and 160 would be great
About the 145 boobs, nope I dont agree , it is not just a matter of size, it is also a poor design
DS should take take the occasion to modify the mould