DS vagina appearance
Moderator: jiayi
DS vagina appearance
I was browsing their site and saw this image of the 167: https://www.dsdoll.us/pics/upgradePics/ ... ail_01.jpg
Which for my taste the vagina appearance is honestly not ideal (though the body is magnificent).
Then I went into their gallery and saw the vagina appearance here: https://www.dsdoll.us/galleria/realisti ... _kayla170r which is pretty perfect. Why does the one here look so much different for the same body? Are there any galleries which have comparisons or clear images of the vaginas for varying DS Dolls? Most seem to be censored or just not shown.
Re: DS vagina appearance
Re: DS vagina appearance
http://dullahanprojects.com/plaisonar/
Works with all HTML5-compatible phones. Just press the pink button and shake your phone!
App Discussion: http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 7&start=45
Re: DS vagina appearance
Re: DS vagina appearance
This is what the insert looks like. It is quite small, hardly 6 inches from tip to tip.
The first picture you linked is not accurate. The gallery looks accurate, but very optimistic on insert positioning. In fact if you tried to have sex with her with the insert positioned like that, you would probably just push the insert into her and make it bunch up, and it wouldn't work.
It is more practical to have the insert sticking out a little, like this. Actually this ends up looking a lot like the first picture.
This is with no insert. She was no longer new when I took this, and I'd already done repairs for tears around the vagina entry.
And this is with the insert they designed for the Ex-lite. Obviously this insert doesn't look very natural, and the main benefit is that it will never slip inside her too far. This insert is extremely tight.
Re: DS vagina appearance
Hey, thanks for the thorough reply. This makes a lot of sense now since you could just push the insert in further and move her legs together like in the gallery I linked. I imagine the only way to have it look like that during sex would to have them silicon glue it, but whether that's worth losing replaceable inserts is a different question. Thanks again!jonn wrote:I have one of the earliest DS 167 dolls, ordered December 2015 I think it was, just as the doll was going up for sale on the DS websites. Back then they still called the model "170". I found the early inserts to be quite delicate, but after breaking two of them the replacements were a lot thicker at the back end and have not broken yet.
This is what the insert looks like. It is quite small, hardly 6 inches from tip to tip.
The first picture you linked is not accurate. The gallery looks accurate, but very optimistic on insert positioning. In fact if you tried to have sex with her with the insert positioned like that, you would probably just push the insert into her and make it bunch up, and it wouldn't work.
It is more practical to have the insert sticking out a little, like this. Actually this ends up looking a lot like the first picture.
This is with no insert. She was no longer new when I took this, and I'd already done repairs for tears around the vagina entry.
And this is with the insert they designed for the Ex-lite. Obviously this insert doesn't look very natural, and the main benefit is that it will never slip inside her too far. This insert is extremely tight.
- manfredixon
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:41 am
- Location: Northern Europe
- Contact:
Re: DS vagina appearance
yeah I've also dealt with the bewilderment that comes with this issue... it took me a long time before I found one that I liked enough to order; mainly because of this particular reason. Sadly, when the company sent me pictures of the finished product (I bought it from a manufacturer on Alibaba) the vagina didn't quite look the way I'd hoped, but still good enough for me to accept. On the day I received it though, I brought out a box cutter and started modifying And I gotta say, I managed to get it looking pretty damn good! In hindsight, with better tools and more patience, I probably could've made it look even better too, but I'm still happy with the result, so...
I dunno if that helped you at all in your decision, but if you're moderately handy I reckon you could easily do a few mods without damaging the doll noticeably.
Best of luck to you!
kazuma213 wrote:I haven't purchased a doll yet, but I've been mostly leaning towards a DS Doll at this time unless I decide to get something cheap to test the waters. With that said, I see some conflicting images on the appearance of the vagina. Most of the TPE dolls I've seen have what I'd consider a more ideal appearance.
I was browsing their site and saw this image of the 167: https://www.dsdoll.us/pics/upgradePics/ ... ail_01.jpg
Which for my taste the vagina appearance is honestly not ideal (though the body is magnificent).
Then I went into their gallery and saw the vagina appearance here: https://www.dsdoll.us/galleria/realisti ... _kayla170r which is pretty perfect. Why does the one here look so much different for the same body? Are there any galleries which have comparisons or clear images of the vaginas for varying DS Dolls? Most seem to be censored or just not shown.
Currently doll-less! Past companions: 155cm Siluomei, 140cm Siluomei, 155cm IronTech, WMDoll 162B, XY Doll 168B, XY Doll 148D, Starpery 169C, Starpery 171A
Photo galleries: XY Doll gallery 1 - Gallery addition 1 - Gallery addition 2
Re: DS vagina appearance
Are tears pretty common? I see a lot of posts mentioning that.jonn wrote:This is with no insert. She was no longer new when I took this, and I'd already done repairs for tears around the vagina entry.
Re: DS vagina appearance
Yeah that's what it looks like. The second pictures are way better.QL57812 wrote:We need a DS expert here (I’m not), but almost looks like one is an insert vagina (protruding lips) and the other is fixed.
Re: DS vagina appearance
Latter is not fixed either, unless the insert is glued. The labia part is an insert.Jamielin wrote:Yeah that's what it looks like. The second pictures are way better.QL57812 wrote:We need a DS expert here (I’m not), but almost looks like one is an insert vagina (protruding lips) and the other is fixed.
http://dullahanprojects.com/plaisonar/
Works with all HTML5-compatible phones. Just press the pink button and shake your phone!
App Discussion: http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 7&start=45
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: DS vagina appearance
**Have any of you had DS (or other manufacturer) do this? I'm a little concerned about the appearance, but I'm much more concerned about the durability of the insert and whether water might get trapped between the insert and the cavity, etc.
Any thoughts?
Re: DS vagina appearance
You can ask DS for 145 custom insert. It's larger and stays in place better. Drawback is that the whole labia part will be outside instead of just the edges.turboflatus wrote:I have a DS145+ and LOVE her figure, but have been pretty disappointed with the insert experience. When I'm in a hurry, the insert all by itself is actually pretty good! But getting a good fit and position, and then having it STAY in place has been extremely difficult. I recently contacted DS and asked if they ever plan to make the DS145+ with a fixed vagina. They replied no, but would be happy to glue in place in the factory.
**Have any of you had DS (or other manufacturer) do this? I'm a little concerned about the appearance, but I'm much more concerned about the durability of the insert and whether water might get trapped between the insert and the cavity, etc.
Any thoughts?
http://dullahanprojects.com/plaisonar/
Works with all HTML5-compatible phones. Just press the pink button and shake your phone!
App Discussion: http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 7&start=45