WMdolls 163cm new photo

Post by **WM dolls** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:33 am

WMdolls 163cm new photo .

More photo and information about 163cm dolls, please visit
http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=54387

Thndrrbolt · Post by **Thndrrbolt** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:15 am

Absolutely beautiful.
Why can't I get this sort of face on a body like the Doll Sweet 145 "Plus" model?
Don't think I can manage the weight (or the price tag!) of a 160- class doll.
T'Bolt

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:16 am

Breath-taking beauty!

lsmithiii · Post by **lsmithiii** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:29 am

Thndrrbolt wrote:Absolutely beautiful.
Why can't I get this sort of face on a body like the Doll Sweet 145 "Plus" model?
Don't think I can manage the weight (or the price tag!) of a 160- class doll.
T'Bolt

I think this doll comes in at a better price point than the 145 or 145plus DS those are both just under 4k with shipping, this doll is at about 3k. The weight is another story.

Post by **WM dolls** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:39 am

Thndrrbolt wrote:Absolutely beautiful.
Why can't I get this sort of face on a body like the Doll Sweet 145 "Plus" model?
Don't think I can manage the weight (or the price tag!) of a 160- class doll.
T'Bolt

WM dolls 145cm dolls will come soon. you can visit this link see model photo about our 145cm
http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=54165

Thndrrbolt · Post by **Thndrrbolt** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:17 pm

I see what you mean about the difference in prices.
To be fair, however, you are comparing a WM TPE doll to a DS silicone doll, and silicone dolls are normally more expensive.
I really like many of the WM faces! But, with the possible exception of the 135 cm doll, whose thumbnails open to photos showing only the head, they are not as busty as I prefer. That's why I was using the DS 145 Plus model for comparison.
Another factor, since I am not as familiar with the WM offerings as I am with some of the other companies: the doll description mentions the use of epoxy resin as one of the ingredients. I wonder if this means that the doll will have hard places where you would want and expect soft ones? I do recall this being an issue with certain doll sizes, though i do not recall the manufacturer's name.
I ask these things here instead of in a PM so that all may benefit from the information.
The photo of the clay sculpture of their proposed 145 model looks very similar to one I saw from another manufacturer several months ago. Their doll has yet to come to market.
T'Bolt

viniz113 · Post by **viniz113** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:30 pm

DO IT, DO IT, VM ,DO THE 145 doll,with a weight Under 50 lbs or so,and you'll have a winner believe me.

windave · Post by **windave** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:47 pm

Very nice looking doll.

Christine · Post by **Christine** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:44 pm

You have some very nice looking doll's....

samfaster2413 · Post by **samfaster2413** » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:54 pm

nice picture, she is very pretty

Post by **WM dolls** » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:30 am

Copy pose.

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:32 am

Oh! That's good!

staycool64 · Post by **staycool64** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 4:06 am

Amazing beauty.. Tbolt is rite apoxy filled is not good and I believe I had conversations with maybe the same doll maker. The BUTT is hard in there doll and there was a recent review on them.
NOT YOU WMDOLL I am speaking of another doll maker. I want a soft Butt and breast and think thats priority in my preferences.

Obin · Post by **Obin** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 5:00 am

Thndrrbolt wrote:the doll description mentions the use of epoxy resin as one of the ingredients. I wonder if this means that the doll will have hard places where you would want and expect soft ones?

I didn't reply to this, because I expected that WM would. Reportedly, the resin outer core, at least for the most part, is no longer used. My Sarah has the resin outer core, so her stomach doesn't compress in more than the layer of skin covering it near the naval. Such isn't the case with the newer dolls, as far as I know.

For more details about her construction, you can read the first post of my review. My review does not apply to the newer dolls.

coleridge · Post by **coleridge** » Sun Jun 22, 2014 5:38 am

I contacted 1am Dolls very recently about this. They say that all the WM TPE dolls now have exactly the same construction. The only difference is size and weight.