163 cm orifice anatomy question

Reeds22 · Post by **Reeds22** » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:02 pm

For those who own a 163 cm doll, how is the vaginal and anus placement as compared to other TPE dolls/brands (especially compared to OR Doll since they recently tried to correct theirs)?

This is my only hangup so far before making the big jump to owning one

coleridge · Post by **coleridge** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:41 am

I'm the ex-owner of a WM 163 cm doll "Pippa" (now in the hands of haremlover) - so I've attached a couple of pics which may help. Pippa had a built-in vagina, but I would assume the orifice placement is the same for the insert version? She was delivered in July 2014. Ideally there'd be somebody with one of the latest OR dolls as well so you could get a side-by-side comparison.

tubbienine · Post by **tubbienine** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:11 am

The location of the orifices seem to be perfect on this doll. But this is the only doll I have seen them correctly placed that is in TPE from China. Why is that?

In every other TPE doll from China, they all have the holes too high up. If they just moved both down a little more like this doll, it would be IDEAL! Very realistic.

windave · Post by **windave** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:36 pm

Thanks for your input, Coleridge. I think your ex-doll is a beauty and the built in looks very realistic.

coleridge · Post by **coleridge** » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:41 pm

windave wrote:Thanks for your input, Coleridge. I think your ex-doll is a beauty and the built in looks very realistic.

It's a pleasure windave - and thanks.

Reeds22 · Post by **Reeds22** » Thu Jan 29, 2015 1:47 am

thanks for the pics coleridge, i cant tell by the pics but how is the anal orifice, would you say it is in the correct position?

coleridge · Post by **coleridge** » Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:53 am

nofingers4u wrote:thanks for the pics coleridge, i cant tell by the pics but how is the anal orifice, would you say it is in the correct position?

Unfortunately I only have the pics to go on myself now - but I'd say it's maybe an inch or an inch and a half forward of where it should be. Likewise probably the vagina - though I didn't personally find that this slight mis-placement was enough to detract from the realism of the doll. From the front (i.e. in the top pic) the vagina looks pretty much like a real woman's to me.

haremlover · Post by **haremlover** » Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:21 pm

Pippa wanted to reply herself but as she's never been able to look at herself down there before seeing these photos, I told her she wasn't in a position to comment.

The reality is that to some extent exact placement doesn't matter provided there is backwards and forwards flexibility in the spine and I think I've read about a new joint which has been incorporated since Pippa left the factory.

Where that hinge is not available, if one's on top perhaps one has to put her on something to raise her by an inch whilst being on her side doesn't matter.

She hasn't been very keen to invite me to try an anal position. I have a PIB Bathing Beauty who is silicone and in a rather different class to WM in terms of price and she has a specifically attractive anal position which is frankly wonderful. But she is quite a harder silicone. Pippa was in the care of someone else who's not a member here between leaving Coleridge and coming to me. Her anal hole shows signs of fragility around the edge with some minor fragmentation of TPE and I haven't wanted to add to that in "use". Another silicone doll which is much softer than the PIB has an anal hole nicely placed which I tried once but not again as with her also there were signs of abrasion and I didn't want to upset her cosmetic beauty. A similar silicone doll for sale had not had such a sympathetic owner, clearly regarding the doll as a fuckobject rather than a toy lady and with the result that the hole had been enlarged and wrecked with rough edges. The interior of Pippa's anatomy is clearly made for good enjoyment if one wants to, but Pippa to both Coleridge and I was and is a lady of character rather than an expendable toy.

Best wishes

Harem

Reeds22 · Post by **Reeds22** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:25 am

haremlover wrote:Pippa wanted to reply herself but as she's never been able to look at herself down there before seeing these photos, I told her she wasn't in a position to comment.

The reality is that to some extent exact placement doesn't matter provided there is backwards and forwards flexibility in the spine and I think I've read about a new joint which has been incorporated since Pippa left the factory.

Where that hinge is not available, if one's on top perhaps one has to put her on something to raise her by an inch whilst being on her side doesn't matter.

She hasn't been very keen to invite me to try an anal position. I have a PIB Bathing Beauty who is silicone and in a rather different class to WM in terms of price and she has a specifically attractive anal position which is frankly wonderful. But she is quite a harder silicone. Pippa was in the care of someone else who's not a member here between leaving Coleridge and coming to me. Her anal hole shows signs of fragility around the edge with some minor fragmentation of TPE and I haven't wanted to add to that in "use". Another silicone doll which is much softer than the PIB has an anal hole nicely placed which I tried once but not again as with her also there were signs of abrasion and I didn't want to upset her cosmetic beauty. A similar silicone doll for sale had not had such a sympathetic owner, clearly regarding the doll as a fuckobject rather than a toy lady and with the result that the hole had been enlarged and wrecked with rough edges. The interior of Pippa's anatomy is clearly made for good enjoyment if one wants to, but Pippa to both Coleridge and I was and is a lady of character rather than an expendable toy.

Best wishes

Harem

last question is Pippa insert or built-in? which do you think is better? thanks

haremlover · Post by **haremlover** » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:24 am

Pippa is built in. In action, it's rather good. Inserts are easier to clean of course, but many people think that built in is better.

The problem is cleaning. On another thread WM have announced that they are developing a new skeleton which can stand happily - so taking her to the shower to wash her out properly with a hose is then practical.

In the absence of her being able to stand in the shower I have some 1 1/2 inch paint roller roll-pads and one can put one in to absorb whatever might be there, put another one in soaked in water to wash and then insert another dry to dry it out. I then allow her to keep her legs apart to enable ventilation and evaporation.

Of course with an insert you just whip it out and Bob's your Uncle. . . .

TPE does give a most wonderful sexual experience . . .

Best wishes

Harem