www.wmdolls.com

165 vs 163 WMDoll body

WM dolls was establish on 2012, we have own production base (located center of Greater Bay Area, Guangdong, China), which is one of the most professional and the biggest factory of realistic sex dolls in the world.
As pioneered TPE used and many famous brands' dolls manufacturer, We have been focusing on customer experience, and continue to work hard to develop new functions for dolls.
We have many patents and independently developed exclusive functions, Such as Breathing feature, Ball Joints Hand Skeleton, Real Oral Sex(ROS) Head, etc.
Website: www.wmdolls.com
Post Reply
bratistuta
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:32 am
Location: UK
Contact:

165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by bratistuta »

Hi,

I was doing the weekly wash, powder routine and decided to take some pictures of the bodies next to each other in case anyone is looking into either body at the moment.

165cm on the left in natural skin tone
163cm on the right in tanned skin tone

I like both bodies for different reasons and do not have a preferance on tone as I really like both to be honest.

Hope this helps.
2016-08-14 11.15.20.jpg
2016-08-14 11.15.20.jpg (865.29 KiB) Viewed 4997 times
2016-08-14 11.15.14.jpg
2016-08-14 11.15.14.jpg (913.81 KiB) Viewed 4997 times
2016-08-14 11.14.29.jpg
2016-08-14 11.14.29.jpg (927.11 KiB) Viewed 4997 times
2016-08-14 11.15.31.jpg
2016-08-14 11.15.31.jpg (832.44 KiB) Viewed 4997 times

User avatar
windave
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2909
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:00 am
Location: left coastal now
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by windave »

Thanks for this side to side comparison.

amytyl
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:19 am
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by amytyl »

As a fellow 163 owner, does it seem like they just made the legs longer & skinnier and an added cup size, or what other differences do you see?
For more pics of my beautiful companions see: http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=14498

bratistuta
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:32 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by bratistuta »

For me I prefer looking at the 165 breasts when clothed as the cleavage is very alluring. The 163 breasts may look more realistic naked but do not fill out clothes/bras as well (more shape than size) or provide much central cleavage for me. The 163 breasts are very firm at the moment though so this may change as she softens. However in the hips department the 163 wins as she can fit lower clothes/dresses better and is more curvy where as the 165 is pretty skinny/straight from the beasts down. This may not be as obvious in the pictures but when clothed you notice.

Generally the 163 feels more solid, and as such is heavier. I have found the 165 much lighter now after having to lugg around the 163.

As mentioned above the TPE feels different as well, my 165 is softer compared to my 163. That might be an age thing or something to do with the different tone TPE I am not sure. I like the the soft feel.

When stood next to each other my 163 seems strangley taller than my 165 but really I think its the slightly bigger build just gives it that effect. There is very little in it as 2cm would suggest.

Obviously all my own subjective opinions there based on owning the two. As mentioned I like elements of both and the variation is nice as I would not want two dolls the same :D

amytyl
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:19 am
Location: Orlando
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by amytyl »

Thank you, that definitely helps.
For more pics of my beautiful companions see: http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=14498

User avatar
DollAfficionado
Member
Member
Posts: 11924
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 12:00 am
Location: In Doll Paradise
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by DollAfficionado »

Thank you for the comparison shots.
DollAfficionado (D.A.) 8)
Review of my SUKI doll from Sili Doll viewtopic.php?f=253&t=73439

User avatar
Booty Call Dolls
VENDOR
VENDOR
Posts: 23672
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by Booty Call Dolls »

In fact, the 165 is actually lighter.
http://dolldesire.com/
. One vendor name kept coming up as being great at helping customers walk through the process, Booty Call Dolls. So I decided I would work with them on this first purchase, and did.
-princeoverit
You could not of found a better person to help you with your first doll. Jeff /Booty call dolls, knows his stuff... One of the few members that is a vendor and a real lover of dolls. He owns quite a few dolls, and really understands the love we all share.
-Just in time

username321
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:36 am
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by username321 »

What awesome photos! I'm looking into getting a WMDolls 163cm C Cup (need to sort the storage problem first!) and this is a good comparison. Do you have any more photos to share?

MikeyUK
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:43 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by MikeyUK »

I absolutely love my 165. The 163 -is- more realistically proportioned, but I like my girls slender and the 165 hits all the right spot with me.

Can't stop staring at her boobs, and her ass in gym shorts is nothing short of eye popping.

User avatar
Booty Call Dolls
VENDOR
VENDOR
Posts: 23672
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
Contact:

Re: 165 vs 163 WMDoll body

Post by Booty Call Dolls »

You can not go wrong with either
BCD

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS