WM 170CM new doll

rizzo · Post by **rizzo** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:09 am

Beautiful doll, the body is awesome. But those pasted-on nipples ruin it for me. If you guys made one with more realistic nipples I might order one.

james 1966 · Post by **james 1966** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:17 am

I love the body shape of this doll, and the super high quality photographs almost bring her to life, but....I can see it all now...''WM 170cm for sale. I thought I could handle this doll but she's just too much for my back. I just had surgery last July...I injured my back at work, I'm not as in shape as I thought", etc. etc. etc...

Bazinga · Post by **Bazinga** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:36 am

I'm in love with her face(the first one shown) but those nipples.......

kookaburra · Post by **kookaburra** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:23 am

Well just to add another opinion - I think this doll is hot AF, I love the athletic body, the bootie and the nipples. I kind of prefer the raised, 3-d areola instead of just painted on. That photo we're all looking at is also heavily shadowed, so the effect is a bit extreme. In the original photos it's not so pronounced. But I like both photo sets. This is Wonder Woman's body!

85-90 lbs though, better start working out again!

MayLowDee · Post by **MayLowDee** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:17 am

So 88/55/96cm at 41kg, at first I was excited expecting this to be something like 100/80/100ish American standard big doll. Guess I'll have to see some of the users review before I make another purchase.

Begog · Post by **Begog** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:42 am

dreamerx07 wrote:and who woulnt want a dolly w these:

Me. I'd rather have the glued-on looking nipples this doll has to offer. WM, please don't go in this direction.

Mazinga · Post by **Mazinga** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:53 am

The general body is fantastic, but one Body area anatomically Is not perfect....And too swollen.

oberyn · Post by **oberyn** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:06 am

Mazinga wrote:The general body is fantastic, but one Body area anatomically Is not perfect....And too swollen.

I think it is like that to accommodate the insert version .

Cubiko · Post by **Cubiko** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:51 am

Hey guys - here´s a closeup. I´ve had this doll for about 1 month now and I love that nice looking thigh gap on this doll. I have not weighed her but standing flat on her bare feet she was exactly 168 cm high, without shoes or a wig. She feels somewhere around the 160 cm doll in weight, but I could be wrong.

oberyn · Post by **oberyn** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:57 am

mandos wrote:Hey guys - here´s a closeup. I´ve had this doll for about 1 month now and I love that nice looking thigh gap on this doll. I have not weighed her but standing flat on her bare feet she was exactly 168 cm high, without shoes or a wig. She feels somewhere around the 160 cm doll in weight, but I could be wrong.

Nice gap

Scoob · Post by **Scoob** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:04 pm

Hey Mandos, can you let us know if the butt is soft/jiggly?

Up2myneck · Post by **Up2myneck** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:33 pm

This is a fantastic body from WM, agree with most of the comments on here regarding some minor details, but the weight might be the only real problem for me! I've been looking to get a big sister for my WM136, and this doll fits the bill almost perfectly, but my old back will probably let me down with this one!

james 1966 · Post by **james 1966** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:51 pm

Regarding the 'swollen pussy'...maybe she's been using a pussy pump?

Look, I adore these bigger dolls. I would love to start seeing 5'10'' dolls with crazy curvy proportions like 40''x24''x50''...but, ain't gonna happen until they stop just pouring 70lbs. of liquefied TPE around a metal skeleton. I know it's tried and tested, it's easy to do. Just create a new mold every 3 months and have everybody on TDF going nuts drooling all over themselves swearing, ''OMG..

...I just HAVE to pull the trigger on this one!'' And 2 days later they calm the fuck down and start realizing they haven't the space or the money to buy the latest TPE doll. I hate to sound like a killjoy, but God-dammit someone has to demand better and lighter construction methods and I guess i'll be one of those people. Just keeping it real. Until sales start dropping off, this will be status quo.

Anung Un Rama · Post by **Anung Un Rama** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:42 pm

Spartan898 wrote:
mandos wrote:Hey guys - here´s a closeup. I´ve had this doll for about 1 month now and I love that nice looking thigh gap on this doll. I have not weighed her but standing flat on her bare feet she was exactly 168 cm high, without shoes or a wig. She feels somewhere around the 160 cm doll in weight, but I could be wrong.
Nice gap

Thanks mandos for the rear shot....and for Spartan...the gap is called the CRANSTON!

Do not believe me image search google for cranston gap...and I am not talking about the pub called The Beer Tree At Cranston Gap, Downingtown, Pennsylvania

Anung

timetraveler1 · Post by **timetraveler1** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:52 pm

james 1966, you are not a lone , if you check a earlier post i also mentioned that doll companies need to create a way to make lighter dolls , either using air pockets etc in more of the body . dolls like these look super nice but are getting on the heavy side and i believe will not sell as many , i think doll companies (any) will find out they will be able to sell a lot more of these voluptuous dolls if they can create better ways to make these dolls lighter.
Doll companies have came a long way on progress on these dolls and i know they could come up with ways of making larger dolls lighter . it would be in doll companies best interest to do it , to sell more of these type of dolls.
That is just my opinion on it.

I am not putting this down or anything its a beautiful doll and actually a type of doll i have talked about in the past to build (this body type).