I concur...was seriously considering my upcoming purchase, but then saw those nipples and thought they were simply pasties that had been put on by mistake. Without any chance of having them fixed, I'll still be going with my 160 pick with the large buttdollguy wrote:Love the doll,but those nipples are a no no for me. Ive contacted them directly and they have no plans of changing them. I seriously would instantly buy the doll. It is very balanced,but the nipples kill it for me.
It is like a cute lady with bad baby damage, and every time you lift her shirt it is there. Call me shallow! !
More photos of the 170 cm
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:27 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
I've seen many threads about how people at TDF would like heads to be more realistic and look like real women but has anybody thought of emailing manufacturers what they would like and what they think of the current dolls being made?
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Done.Sector_1 wrote:emailing manufacturer
However I think it's a job of their representative here.
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
I gave them a link to this thread in "Contact Us" form))) Useless, I know....mandos wrote:I don't think this thread is the right place to complain
Anyway, mandos, thanks for your work. I'd like to be able to take such pictures myself oneday.
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:27 am
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
You did...? good for you!mark81 wrote:
I gave them a link to this thread in "Contact Us" form)))
Lets hope other people are not put off from sharing their opions. Like somebody said earlier in the thread, let's hope they also take notice.
And I totally agree with you mark81 they are indeed nice photos and thanks mandos for the post.
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
This would be my next tpe doll, if my bad back could take the strain! Oh the joys of getting older...................
- shawntaew31
- Senior Member
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 3:44 am
- Location: oregon
- Contact:
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Strong argument can be made this is 2. Both are 165cm K-cup, but with different waist size, hip size, nipple size, and ribcage flesh folds. They are sold by vendors as if they are the same, but are undisputedly different molds.symmes wrote:
- 1 K-cup body (165cm)
https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=80478
https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=240&t=80665
- haremlover
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 16238
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: UK and South of France
- Contact:
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
She's an outright stunner by any standards.
Best wishes
Harem
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
I am not sure, I have not weighed the doll. My guess is slightly lighter than the 160 cm, but as you and other multiple doll owners probably know some dolls are better balanced than others. This doll has better weight distribution than the 160 cm so it is much easier to handle and move around. Despite this I have not been able to make her stand without one arm touching a wall or chair or similar, and this was no problem with the 160 and 168 cm dolls. Bigger breasts might be the reason. All dolls are different it seemsharemlover wrote:what's the weight of this doll? How manageable is she?
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
How are the 170's legs and feet, in partiicular the calves and how do they compare to the 160 or 161?
Also...how is she in comparison with your yl148?
Apologies for all questions.
Smith.
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Re: More photos of the 170 cm
Difficult to answer. Compared to the 160 and 148 they are more realistic for sure, but then again it´s a completely different body type. First TPE doll I´ve seen with added details to the calves, muscles. And it has that thigh gap that I like where the thighs go inwards at the topDollsmith wrote:Mandos...the pictures are amazing. You are an artist for sure.
How are the 170's legs and feet, in partiicular the calves and how do they compare to the 160 or 161?
Also...how is she in comparison with your yl148?
Apologies for all questions.
Smith.