Rare #70 face is sooooo gorgeous

Post by **Sexy Sex Doll** » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:31 pm

Love her angelical smile!!!! What a perfect face!

Post by **Sexy Sex Doll** » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:32 pm

She looks so perfect on WM168E!

piercecrown · Post by **piercecrown** » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:39 pm

great boy what height is she? im curious

Post by **Sexy Sex Doll** » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:07 pm

She's 168cm E-cup

horseface · Post by **horseface** » Tue Jul 11, 2017 11:58 pm

Beautiful face and doll but isn't it WM head #56?

Anung Un Rama · Post by **Anung Un Rama** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:18 am

horseface wrote:Beautiful face and doll but isn't it WM head #56?

I was thinking the same thing

Anung

Post by **Sexy Sex Doll** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:33 am

56 & 70 are very similar, but 70 gets slightly smaller nose

Dr Dollinger · Post by **Dr Dollinger** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 7:09 am

Thanks for your beautiful pictures!
I hope you could enlighten the confusion a bit by comparison of both heads. That would be great.
I thought the mouth of the #70 is slightly more shut and the lips & front teeth are somewhat different

horseface · Post by **horseface** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:33 pm

Here's a side by side of heads #56 (left) and #70(right)
I love both of them but don't see much different

Knightshift · Post by **Knightshift** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:23 pm

I agree, very similar but the #56 has a much more life-like quality about her, whereas the #70 is clearly a doll. One could almost think the #56 is a real person at first glance. Perhaps its just the photography or lighting? Something about her eyes and the tiny creases on her lower lip. The devil is in the details!

Begog · Post by **Begog** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 6:25 pm

Anung Un Rama wrote:
horseface wrote:Beautiful face and doll but isn't it WM head #56?
I was thinking the same thing

Anung

Ditto.

JunkGuy · Post by **JunkGuy** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:58 pm

Sexy Sex Doll wrote:56 & 70 are very similar

To the point that its to hard to make a distinction between them. Effectively, they are both 56 - just way too close for anyone to reasonably treat them as separate faces. We've seen other 56s that look less alike than the 56 and 70 shown above. Some of the other 70 photos do look different enough though they are still quite similar (particuarly the ones mounted on the 165D)

Mark Spencer · Post by **Mark Spencer** » Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:29 pm

Like everyone else, I can certainly see the similarity. But the #70 looks
more matured to me. Like 56's older sister.
Could be makeup, lighting or wigs, too. But it looks older.