161 vs 168

We turn dreams into reality!
Website: dolldesire.com
Post Reply
blackcloud
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:58 pm
Contact:

161 vs 168

Post by blackcloud »

Maybe it's just me, but these 2 seem to share the same body except for the hieght.
Attachments
168-74-13__47988.1487978479.600.659.png
168-74-13__47988.1487978479.600.659.png (496.19 KiB) Viewed 1116 times
102_c06781e7-2446-49f4-a472-106ea7d23271_large.jpg
102_c06781e7-2446-49f4-a472-106ea7d23271_large.jpg (14.23 KiB) Viewed 1116 times

User avatar
sorona
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 4:50 pm
Contact:

Re: 161 vs 168

Post by sorona »

From the specifics, it seems the 168 has 6 cm more on the hips.

I just read it weights 40 kg....man it's really heavy!!! Consider it is not moving by herself so it can be very hard to move. Cecilie weights 25 kg, I can move her but it's not so easy. With 40 kg I think it's really difficult.

I would like to hear some other user's experience about that.

Happy choice!
Hello I'm Cecilie - WM155 + WM56 head:
http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 67&t=83689

THE HARD CHOICE: you can view my decisional process here:
http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 87&t=78076

blackcloud
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 567
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:58 pm
Contact:

Re: 161 vs 168

Post by blackcloud »

I'm aware of little differences. All I was saying, is they do look very similar

User avatar
trauma
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1521
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: 161 vs 168

Post by trauma »

161 has a terrible looking ass, like a dudes ass. 168 is damn near perfect all over.

samara78
Doll Visionary
Doll Visionary
Posts: 12990
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:32 am

Re: 161 vs 168

Post by samara78 »

If you can lift and roll over perfect go for it. I have a W.M classic 163 and she weighs at least 70#
The empty orchestra still plays.
Bored, certified "plastic" surgeon. Serving the masses.
Dolls i have worked on. Real doll ,JM doll,teddybabes,Anime fabric doll,wm doll, d.s dolls, Diao shi, extravaganza air dolls, 1st pc, and candy8teen dolls.

Need work done? Feel free to send me a note.

User avatar
Sunny Evergreen
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:24 pm
Contact:

Re: 161 vs 168

Post by Sunny Evergreen »

sorona wrote:From the specifics, it seems the 168 has 6 cm more on the hips.

I just read it weights 40 kg....man it's really heavy!!! Consider it is not moving by herself so it can be very hard to move. Cecilie weights 25 kg, I can move her but it's not so easy. With 40 kg I think it's really difficult.

I would like to hear some other user's experience about that.

Happy choice!

The weight of a 168 is not too bad to handle. The key is to lift with your back, using a jerking twisting motion...

lol *dont do that please*

There is nice distribution , and when bridal carried it is fine. I'd say you need to be a 6-7 on a 10 scale in a strength , with no phyical limitations. (backs, knee's , etc)

The 168 is made with softer TPE by default , and is prone is creasing/damage etc under its weight. reposition often, take extra care. I had no idea . :?


creasing is kinda inevitable though.... LOL

It's a body to die for though! and my arms are getting bigger too ! lol :D

Cheers!

Sunny--

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS