WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
You can't burn a flag and say that its just a piece of cloth.
You can't have sex with a child-like figure and say that its just a piece of TPE.
I agree that there is a very grey line that both arguments are skirting. But that's just how it is.
- Nadia's Masturbation Comic-Style Post **HOT**
- Reetzia Stripping Down in Stereoscopic 3D **HOT**
- Nadia's Pictorial Post (DS163+, Sandy Head)
- Reetzia's Pictorial Post (DS163+, Kayla Head)
- How many dolls owners own in secret?
- What was your primary INTENDED use of your doll?
- rubherkitty
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 8966
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:24 pm
- Location: Interstate 44 with 10 long-haired Friends a' Jesus In a chartreuse micra-bus
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
Actually, I think the burning or desecration of a flag, book of worship, etc IS freedom of speech. If you live in America anyway.MannyCan wrote:We talked about this already a zillion times.
You can't burn a flag and say that its just a piece of cloth.
You can't have sex with a child-like figure and say that its just a piece of TPE.
I agree that there is a very grey line that both arguments are skirting. But that's just how it is.
And personally, I feel anything you do w/a piece is TPE regardless of the shape is a private matter as long as it's hurting no one else. The legal status is another issue and the user's issue to cross.
And again, regardless of the side of the issue you're on, TDF does not support a certain style of doll so there is no reason to even discuss it here. They are not welcome here nor the debate either pro or con.
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
Exactly. No matter how good anyone's argument is in this forum, the fact is; it's not acceptable It's delusional to think that a piece of rubber is not unlawful will not change real-world outcomes FYI: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cbsa-b ... -1.4941213rubherkitty wrote:TDF does not support a certain style of doll so there is no reason to even discuss it here. They are not welcome here nor the debate either pro or con.
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr4655
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:48 am
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
Donovan (R) of NY, who originally introduced the Bill, however, was defeated in the last election and is no longer a Congressman. I do not see anyone else in the current session likely to re-introduced such stupid legislation.
But the stupidity of our Representatives has never ceased to amaze me. So, who knows...
-
- Former Member
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:00 am
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
-
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:10 pm
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
- Nescio50
- Site Manager - CoverDoll
- Posts: 23470
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: In TLC, The Low Countries, surrounded by dolls
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
As stated many times before, this thread is meant to be about age estimation. Please keep this thread on-topic. Thank you.
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
Thanks for keeping us in the loop!!Nescio50 wrote:It's good to know that in the US the Creeper Act didn't pass, but please don't turn this thread into discussing politics.
As stated many times before, this thread is meant to be about age estimation. Please keep this thread on-topic. Thank you.
I did a bunch of searching on the underage sex doll case here in Canada which was supposed to be in December however nothing comes up.
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
This pretty much says it all... doesn't matter what members or anyone else thinks or says about this matter, doesn't matter that even the US Congress didn't want to get into this terribly subjective arena..."TDF" has spoken, it's not allowed and don't even dare to discuss it! Sure sounds like tyranny to me. Anyone else remember the Salem Witch hunts, the Scopes trials or the McCarthy era?rubherkitty wrote:MannyCan wrote:
And again, regardless of the side of the issue you're on, TDF does not support a certain style of doll so there is no reason to even discuss it here. They are not welcome here nor the debate either pro or con.
Lives with Shelby WM 158-A
Album: http://www.dollalbum.com/dollgallery/in ... ?cat=14865
- rubherkitty
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 8966
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:24 pm
- Location: Interstate 44 with 10 long-haired Friends a' Jesus In a chartreuse micra-bus
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
You are free to make as many of your own websites to discuss issues that are of a concern to you all day long.
And being YOUR websites you can set the rules. Doesn't get much better than that.
Thank you for your service!
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
- Maviarab
- Doll Patriarch
- Posts: 4502
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: At one with the Schwartz
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
NewAirHH wrote:It is good to learn that the CREEPR Act did not become law. At least *my* country is not yet creating thought crimes of what goes on between a man and what resembles another human being.
Just a reminder folks....Nescio50 wrote:please don't turn this thread into discussing politics.
As stated many times before, this thread is meant to be about age estimation. Please keep this thread on-topic. Thank you.
And this is a privately owned forum. May I remind you that you agree to the rules of this site and it's owners upon registration.briwri01 wrote: This pretty much says it all... doesn't matter what members or anyone else thinks or says about this matter, doesn't matter that even the US Congress didn't want to get into this terribly subjective arena..."TDF" has spoken, it's not allowed and don't even dare to discuss it! Sure sounds like tyranny to me. Anyone else remember the Salem Witch hunts, the Scopes trials or the McCarthy era?
- Chuck Norris
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1145
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:16 am
- Contact:
Re: WARNING: To buyers of young looking dolls
This must have been the longest thread ever and I am getting tired like the rest of you guys to see/read nonsense post about this thread.
And Rubherkitty nailed it!