The VIEW - The SE 168

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 1:08 am

Zarnon wrote:Seems that once the LHP placement is just the way you want it for doggie it would make it less easy for mish. Considering I do most of my sex that way I am happy with one that is easy to use from the front.

Correct placement does not make a doll less easy for missionary. Correct placement enables other sex positions such as sex at spooning position.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 3:49 am

Siliconeman wrote:
Zarnon wrote:Seems that once the LHP placement is just the way you want it for doggie it would make it less easy for mish. Considering I do most of my sex that way I am happy with one that is easy to use from the front.
Correct placement does not make a doll less easy for missionary. Correct placement enables other sex positions such as sex at spooning position.

Certainly in a RG, because she can move her pelvis, but is that always going to be the case with dolls? I can't speak from experience as none of my dolls has perfect LHP; not terrible, mind you, but not perfect either.

If I could find a doll I liked with perfect LHP from a brand I liked, I would buy her in the interests of Science!

Zarnon · Post by **Zarnon** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:39 am

Exactly PDutus. I have had dolls with LHP which was too far posterior and I had to rotate the hips upwards (using pillows mostly) to get proper access. You either have to do that or get a doll with posterior LHP placement with an oversized vagina. I don't get why people don't use the anal orifice for doggie. Mish is such a better position anyways, no stress on the doll. I hope doll mfr keep doing what they're doing instead of changing it all up to satisfy a few people.

With the SE robot doll it seems the motor is going to work primarily for missionary. I'm moving closer and closer to pulling the trigger on one of these dolls (down to the 163 vs the 168). I've never had a doll with motor movement so extremely interested in this brand.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:55 am

Zarnon wrote:Exactly PDutus. I have had dolls with LHP which was too far posterior and I had to rotate the hips upwards (using pillows mostly) to get proper access. You either have to do that or get a doll with posterior LHP placement with an oversized vagina. I don't get why people don't use the anal orifice for doggie. Mish is such a better position anyways, no stress on the doll. I hope doll mfr keep doing what they're doing instead of changing it all up to satisfy a few people.

With the SE robot doll it seems the motor is going to work primarily for missionary. I'm moving closer and closer to pulling the trigger on one of these dolls (down to the 163 vs the 168). I've never had a doll with motor movement so extremely interested in this brand.

I agree with you. I don't tend to do doggie with mine purely because of fear of damaging them, particularly the wrists and hands. And none of mine is a lightweight (40-46Kg), so manoeuvring them into position for doggy ain't the easiest (never mind cowgirl, normal or reverse), nor is positioning a pillow under their bums.

The SE robot doll certainly looks interesting and it will be interesting to see how it develops.

Best wishes

Zarnon · Post by **Zarnon** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:38 am

Pdutus. I have been firming up details with SE dolls. It is looking better and better! Some (all?) of their TPE heads allow oral and the tongue like the WM heads. I have a WM 172 CM too and love the size and how 'real' she feels. I've found the tongue option with the soft TPE the best kissing dolls I've ever had. I'm really psyched to couple that feature with the movement.

I'm looking at the SE 163 vs the 168. I'm worried the larger doll may put more of a strain on the motor. Honestly the boobs are awesome but I'd love to add a larger doll with a B or C cup to my collection.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:13 am

Zarnon wrote:I don't get why people don't use the anal orifice for doggie.

Because sometimes the placement is so bad that even the anal hole is hard to reach. If you want to for example have her lying on bed flat on her tummy and would like to penetrate her anally in that position. Not possible if the LHP is bad such as with SE-Dolls. Butthole is somewhere there nowhere to be found

pinot667 · Post by **pinot667** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 1:57 pm

Siliconeman wrote:
Zarnon wrote:I don't get why people don't use the anal orifice for doggie.
Because sometimes the placement is so bad that even the anal hole is hard to reach. If you want to for example have her lying on bed flat on her tummy and would like to penetrate her anally in that position. Not possible if the LHP is bad such as with SE-Dolls. Butthole is somewhere there nowhere to be found

If you get this doll from SE... then anal would not be needed EVER!

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 3:26 pm

pinot667 wrote: If you get this doll from SE... then anal would not be needed EVER!

That actually looks quite good. I would still like to penetrate her butt hole in that position, I don´t think my member is long enough to reach her pussy (in that position).

It´s great if SE-Doll listens and is willing to make better products.

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:29 pm

That doll above is just as good as any doll

Boobman · Post by **Boobman** » Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:57 pm

Booty Call Dolls wrote:

The breasts look pretty inviting to me. Thicken the legs all of it 7 degrees on the bod O meter dimensions.

pinot667 · Post by **pinot667** » Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:19 am

Siliconeman wrote:
pinot667 wrote: If you get this doll from SE... then anal would not be needed EVER!
That actually looks quite good. I would still like to penetrate her butt hole in that position, I don´t think my member is long enough to reach her pussy (in that position).

It´s great if SE-Doll listens and is willing to make better products.

I believe one of these others should work then.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:49 pm

My guess is that SE has problems with movement of TPE. As you lift her legs things begin to move too much to different places. There should be stronger separation between her labia and legs. It works in similar way than with my IL170 doll. That said the doll at the pictures does not look too bad!

Cheers!

Sili