162F vs 164F
162F vs 164F
- dollsfan64
- Active Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:09 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
- Anmo Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 4:54 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Hope this will help you.
WM162F
Upper/Under breasts: 83cm/56cm
Shoulder width: 35cm
Waist: 54cm
Hip: 87cm
Net weight: 34KG
WM164F
Upper/Under breasts: 78cm/56cm
Shoulder width: 34cm
Waist: 61cm
Hip: 91cm
Net weight: 33KG
.
Contact: customercare@anmodolls.com, support@anmodolls.com
Official website: www.anmodolls.com
TDF Forum: Anmo Dolls Forum
If you have any Questions about dolls, please PM / Email / Online chat to us, we will reply to you within one day.
Anmo Dolls have solved thousands of questions for our members.
If you want wmdolls at the fastest time, Then choose Anmo Dolls.
- P3T3flytese
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2021 1:01 pm
- Location: The Valley of the Uncanny
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Re: 162F vs 164F
- Anmo Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 4:54 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Hi, Dear Colcolt
You are welcome. Yes, maybe an optical illusion.
Because they are not shooting under the same variables, such as different angles, different positions, etc.
But it can be seen easily that their breast types are different.
Cheers,
Anmo Dolls
Contact: customercare@anmodolls.com, support@anmodolls.com
Official website: www.anmodolls.com
TDF Forum: Anmo Dolls Forum
If you have any Questions about dolls, please PM / Email / Online chat to us, we will reply to you within one day.
Anmo Dolls have solved thousands of questions for our members.
If you want wmdolls at the fastest time, Then choose Anmo Dolls.
- dollsfan64
- Active Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:09 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
- milktemptation
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:14 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:36 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Meet Kristina (Starpery 165G Silicone) viewtopic.php?t=163445
- knallhatten
- Senior Member
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2023 1:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Wow!! That is not even a question … what a knockout !mathieu242 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 6:26 pm I would order the AngelKiss version of that doll though, if I was trying to decide between the two !
WMD_7534.jpg
viewtopic.php?p=2454268&hilit=Adele#p2454268
Climax Si60 XL J-CUP Arwen silicon viewtopic.php?t=180055
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2021 2:52 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
Re: 162F vs 164F
The new AngelKiss 164 body does not share any design features with the 162F/164F or J, it is more related to the WM159C - just with a lot more meat on her bones.
Re: 162F vs 164F
- dollsfan64
- Active Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:09 am
- Contact:
Re: 162F vs 164F
I think it's a slit with no labia
i.e. innie or outie
Re: 162F vs 164F
OK-a coin slot variety. They exist, I had a girlfriend that had one.I think it's a slit with no labia
i.e. innie or outie