168E vs 175D
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 2:07 am
- Contact:
168E vs 175D
Re: 168E vs 175D
If it is your first doll ... watch the weight. I am serious. You may think that you are strong enough to handle 90 pound of dead weight, but I am telling you ... you may not.Olivier 2595 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:46 pm Hello, I need an opinion about the WM 168E doll. I wanted to buy 174g but many people say that its LPH is weak. Personally, I prefer slightly fuller shapes, but the most important thing is fun. Can you recommend me some larger dolls?
I do bench 225 pounds at the gym, and I can hardly handle my 81 pounds doll (SM 157G).
Do not get me wrong, you may be able to handle her if you are a big strong dude, but the point I want to bring here is that the reference of weight you are used to, does not apply to doll.
For example, I was able to carry around and bang my 125 pounds girlfriend against the wall with no issue whatsoever, but I cannot do this with my 80 pounds doll.
Check the SM 157G, she is a busty silicon doll (you can see her as Beth in my signature). SM has a lightweight version of her at like 55 pounds or so.
Jael - (YL 148) viewtopic.php?f=212&t=73333
Miriame - (SM 136) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=102115
Beth - (SM 157G) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=149637
Brooke - (Starpery 148F) viewtopic.php?t=175783
***
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2023 2:07 am
- Contact:
Re: 168E vs 175D
I'm 192 cm and I'm afraid the doll will be too small. I was considering wm164j or fBabel99 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 3:02 pmIf it is your first doll ... watch the weight. I am serious. You may think that you are strong enough to handle 90 pound of dead weight, but I am telling you ... you may not.Olivier 2595 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:46 pm Hello, I need an opinion about the WM 168E doll. I wanted to buy 174g but many people say that its LPH is weak. Personally, I prefer slightly fuller shapes, but the most important thing is fun. Can you recommend me some larger dolls?
I do bench 225 pounds at the gym, and I can hardly handle my 81 pounds doll (SM 157G).
Do not get me wrong, you may be able to handle her if you are a big strong dude, but the point I want to bring here is that the reference of weight you are used to, does not apply to doll.
For example, I was able to carry around and bang my 125 pounds girlfriend against the wall with no issue whatsoever, but I cannot do this with my 80 pounds doll.
Check the SM 157G, she is a busty silicon doll (you can see her as Beth in my signature). SM has a lightweight version of her at like 55 pounds or so.
Re: 168E vs 175D
The 164j is a dream of a doll, and her weight is fine! You could not go wrong with her. Many guys here have that model, this is quite a popular one.Olivier 2595 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:43 pmI'm 192 cm and I'm afraid the doll will be too small. I was considering wm164j or fBabel99 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 3:02 pmIf it is your first doll ... watch the weight. I am serious. You may think that you are strong enough to handle 90 pound of dead weight, but I am telling you ... you may not.Olivier 2595 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:46 pm Hello, I need an opinion about the WM 168E doll. I wanted to buy 174g but many people say that its LPH is weak. Personally, I prefer slightly fuller shapes, but the most important thing is fun. Can you recommend me some larger dolls?
I do bench 225 pounds at the gym, and I can hardly handle my 81 pounds doll (SM 157G).
Do not get me wrong, you may be able to handle her if you are a big strong dude, but the point I want to bring here is that the reference of weight you are used to, does not apply to doll.
For example, I was able to carry around and bang my 125 pounds girlfriend against the wall with no issue whatsoever, but I cannot do this with my 80 pounds doll.
Check the SM 157G, she is a busty silicon doll (you can see her as Beth in my signature). SM has a lightweight version of her at like 55 pounds or so.
Jael - (YL 148) viewtopic.php?f=212&t=73333
Miriame - (SM 136) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=102115
Beth - (SM 157G) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=149637
Brooke - (Starpery 148F) viewtopic.php?t=175783
***
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: 168E vs 175D
I think he should go for the bigger dolls, based on stat's he's posted.Babel99 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 3:02 pmIf it is your first doll ... watch the weight. I am serious. You may think that you are strong enough to handle 90 pound of dead weight, but I am telling you ... you may not.Olivier 2595 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 2:46 pm Hello, I need an opinion about the WM 168E doll. I wanted to buy 174g but many people say that its LPH is weak. Personally, I prefer slightly fuller shapes, but the most important thing is fun. Can you recommend me some larger dolls?
I do bench 225 pounds at the gym, and I can hardly handle my 81 pounds doll (SM 157G).
Do not get me wrong, you may be able to handle her if you are a big strong dude, but the point I want to bring here is that the reference of weight you are used to, does not apply to doll.
For example, I was able to carry around and bang my 125 pounds girlfriend against the wall with no issue whatsoever, but I cannot do this with my 80 pounds doll.
Check the SM 157G, she is a busty silicon doll (you can see her as Beth in my signature). SM has a lightweight version of her at like 55 pounds or so.
i'm 182cm & 70kg - and although the 174G is challenging, its' manageable, and I really like the sense of present from tall dolls. he's 192cm/90kg .
I've pointed out a ~20-30% risk based on user specifics that the LHP might not suit someone. I find the LHP a bit limiting.. but most users can use this doll in a larger range of positions than me just fine.
for most people, they can put the doll on her back, raise the legs, and use the doll just fine.
but for me, this is impossible, because the vagina bends in a way that stops me. That applies to 4 different dolls i've tried, all are the same in this regard. I need the channel to stay flat. With the 174G, for flat-missionary, the vagina points down (impossible). for WM172D, flat missionary, the vagina is horizontal (easy)
I dont want to discourage him off this doll... there's a 70% chance it'll work very well, and 30% chance its 'ok but far from perfect'. It's a stunning doll, and being 192cm he's going to appreciate the height alot.
With a bit more info, he'd be able to get an idea how well it will work.
the other people warning about LHP are warning about doggy, but most dolls are hard for this. 174G is ok for this, just not *the best*.
people oversimplify saying LHP is "good" or "bad". it depends alot on the user and what you try to do with it.I wanted to buy 174g but many people say that its LPH is weak.