XTDOLL is about to release a new body 164CM, full of details and features

Post by **XTDoll** » Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:40 am

Z3pc wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:51 am XT does have the spirit of craftsmanship, with excellent body shape and details.

Thank you Z3pc. Regarding the questions you asked via email, I have answered them via email. I hope it will be helpful to you.

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:03 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 7:30 am
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:39 pm I just did a search on Rosemary Doll. My criteria: Silicone body, 150cm and above, reputable manufacturer, under 30Kg weight, breasts small to medium, and innovation.
I got 204 results across multiple manufacturers, including FanReal, Irontech, Angelkiss, and more.
I can tell you that there are some beautiful, gorgeous, sexy girls in that list.
What came up on top for me? The XTdoll 164C...
Can't wait to see what comes next from XTdoll!
We have completed the design phase for small breasts. The next step is to wait for various adjustments to be made in detail.

Any chance you will share pictures of the 3D body? Even the 3D CAD images? How tall is she going to be?

Post by **XTDoll** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:08 pm

Natalie's factory photo with 164C is also a good choice.

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu Mar 21, 2024 2:18 pm

I am very attracted to the 164C body... It is very well done, and with all the innovations (including the removable fingernails) are there. I wonder what it would look like if you put a Nancy (XT-2) head with a blonde wig on it... I'm sure she will be irresistible... She would be Emily with C-cups. But beyond the C-cups, the 164C looks like a very, very feminine body...

Post by **XTDoll** » Fri Mar 22, 2024 2:30 pm

Factory photo

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:45 pm

She looks delicious!!!

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Wed May 08, 2024 11:32 am

Did anyone buy the 164C and got her already? Care to share experience?

Ori392024 · Post by **Ori392024** » Thu May 09, 2024 3:58 pm

What are the reasons for the weight increase of 4kg from the 163F body? 1 cm taller but with smaller bust, where is the added weight going to? 29kg is still lighter than many competing dolls.

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 09, 2024 4:54 pm

Ori392024 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 3:58 pm What are the reasons for the weight increase of 4kg from the 163F body? 1 cm taller but with smaller bust, where is the added weight going to? 29kg is still lighter than many competing dolls.

I combined pictures of the 163F, 164C, 165E, and 168C. With all the details. When you see it, you'll understand. I thought the 164C would be lighter too, but after watching the picture, I get it... Note the following: hips circumference is 3 inches bigger, shoulders are 1 inch wider, and look at the thighs. She is more "hour-glassy" than the others. I'm waiting to see if XT comes out with another shape this month, and if not--I'm planning on getting the 164C for Emily (and the girls...). In my opinion, the 164C is the most attractive of the four.

AtPeace · Post by **AtPeace** » Thu May 09, 2024 5:00 pm

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 10:06 am I'm just waiting for my 163F Emily (AKA Blonde Nancy...).

Maybe after I get her, I should stop reading what else is coming from XTdoll. This company innovates at a crazy pace!

and I'm waiting 4 months for my XT Doll. Maybe after I get mine, I can read with excitement about the new stuff also! I'm curious if emphasis on new XT development supersedes actual factory production and customer service. The development brought me to them, but manufacturing and customer service may cause me to leave. We'll see what XT does. Is 4 months to long to wait?

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 09, 2024 6:23 pm

AtPeace wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:00 pm
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 10:06 am I'm just waiting for my 163F Emily (AKA Blonde Nancy...).

Maybe after I get her, I should stop reading what else is coming from XTdoll. This company innovates at a crazy pace!
and I'm waiting 4 months for my XT Doll. Maybe after I get mine, I can read with excitement about the new stuff also! I'm curious if emphasis on new XT development supersedes actual factory production and customer service. The development brought me to them, but manufacturing and customer service may cause me to leave. We'll see what XT does. Is 4 months to long to wait?

Which one are you waiting for? There were issues with my XT163F, and they had to make her three times, and it still took only two months from order to arrival. What's going on with yours? I'm guessing there is no link between production and development. They are developing new molds for new bodies, but they are building to the molds they already have. These two things should not be competing with each other. Please share what's going on.

AtPeace · Post by **AtPeace** » Thu May 09, 2024 6:54 pm

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:23 pm
AtPeace wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:00 pm
jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 10:06 am I'm just waiting for my 163F Emily (AKA Blonde Nancy...).

Maybe after I get her, I should stop reading what else is coming from XTdoll. This company innovates at a crazy pace!
and I'm waiting 4 months for my XT Doll. Maybe after I get mine, I can read with excitement about the new stuff also! I'm curious if emphasis on new XT development supersedes actual factory production and customer service. The development brought me to them, but manufacturing and customer service may cause me to leave. We'll see what XT does. Is 4 months to long to wait?
Which one are you waiting for? There were issues with my XT163F, and they had to make her three times, and it still took only two months from order to arrival. What's going on with yours? I'm guessing there is no link between production and development. They are developing new molds for new bodies, but they are building to the molds they already have. These two things should not be competing with each other. Please share what's going on.

160G. They sent photos and said BTW, we made it with no anal channel, if ok, we'll ship. If not, we'll remake. I asked for a remake. Then XT via a doll forum message said the 160G mold broke and I was getting a bigger 160H. I never approved that and the 160H was 7kg heavier.
Rosemary Doll wouldn't give me a credit and we haggled over compensation. So, I kept pressing for completion and I am told she is done. This is third time my doll is supposedly done.Awaiting photos. My order was placed February 17th. Should I believe XT? Or is something else going on with my order and others?

Synthian · Post by **Synthian** » Thu May 09, 2024 7:27 pm

XTDoll wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 9:37 pm Our designers and engineers have worked long and hard, using innovation to create this amazing product.
This body has outstanding details and realistic texture.

Very beautiful, XTDoll is at the top of my next body list EXCEPT you do not have any 175 cm bodies or even 173 cm what gives?

jeep2639 · Post by **jeep2639** » Thu May 09, 2024 7:30 pm

AtPeace wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:54 pm 160G. They sent photos and said BTW, we made it with no anal channel, if ok, we'll ship. If not, we'll remake. I asked for a remake. Then XT via a doll forum message said the 160G mold broke and I was getting a bigger 160H. I never approved that and the 160H was 7kg heavier.
Rosemary Doll wouldn't give me a credit and we haggled over compensation. So, I kept pressing for completion and I am told she is done. This is third time my doll is supposedly done.Awaiting photos. My order was placed February 17th. Should I believe XT? Or is something else going on with my order and others?

Oh, wow! Definitely a different experience than mine... Sorry to hear that.

serotta · Post by **serotta** » Thu May 09, 2024 8:50 pm

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 4:54 pm
Ori392024 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 3:58 pm What are the reasons for the weight increase of 4kg from the 163F body? 1 cm taller but with smaller bust, where is the added weight going to? 29kg is still lighter than many competing dolls.
I combined pictures of the 163F, 164C, 165E, and 168C. With all the details. When you see it, you'll understand. I thought the 164C would be lighter too, but after watching the picture, I get it... Note the following: hips circumference is 3 inches bigger, shoulders are 1 inch wider, and look at the thighs. She is more "hour-glassy" than the others. I'm waiting to see if XT comes out with another shape this month, and if not--I'm planning on getting the 164C for Emily (and the girls...). In my opinion, the 164C is the most attractive of the four.

Thanks for the side-by-side, Jeep! Very helpful. I still think the 163C (TPE) is XT's hottest doll. It would be about 26 kg in silicone since it's only a fraction larger than the 163F. Here's a pic.