realsexdoll.com

Lusty Busty love doll

Palace of the plastic princess. Usually ranging from $15 to $300
GFELube
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1654
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:36 pm
Contact:

Lusty Busty love doll

Post by GFELube »

Anyone familiar with the Lusty Busty love doll, available here in the TDF shop?

http://shop.sex-superstore.com/cgi-bin/ ... &type=toys
Image
(Note that this pic from the NassToys site differs slightly from the Store site.)
Product Description

•Pretty Blonde inflatable doll with skimpy pink string bikini remove the top to reveal squeezable, suckable big breasts with hard pigmented nipples
•Silky blonde hair just like a porn star
•Open and tight mouth. Under her bikini bottom is a tight pussy and ass for your pleasure
I obviously need a back-up for Amy, and would like to support the site instead of Adam&Eve's crummy selection.
She seems to have a molded face, but at least she will have an oral SPH, which Amy is sorely lacking.

She is also bent over, which also intrigues me. I would be interested in knowing exactly how "Busty" she actually is,
as I have been burnt on that claim before. And "hard" nipples?!

Please help! :)


P.S. Woo hoo, more than 50 posts!

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

I bought one a few weeks ago. She's not bad. Because her legs are not very spread, I don't find her fun in the doggie-style position (though frankly, this may just be me; while I'm not THAT oddly proportioned, I have never had sex with a woman in that position--when we start off in that position, we inevitably change so we can...make contact, as it were), but she's fun on her back, since her legs spread just enough for that, or in a sitting position.

She has the standard DD softer-molded breasts that most Nanma dolls, such as the "Personalities" line, have--they look even bigger since these dolls are a bit on the small side (relatively speaking), and in fact are fairly nice to touch or grope. On a regular human woman who would have to walk around with them, they'd be a little impractical if they weren't filled with air.
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

GFELube
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1654
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by GFELube »

infl8orama wrote:I bought one a few weeks ago. She's not bad. Because her legs are not very spread, I don't find her fun in the doggie-style position (though frankly, this may just be me; while I'm not THAT oddly proportioned, I have never had sex with a woman in that position--when we start off in that position, we inevitably change so we can...make contact, as it were), but she's fun on her back, since her legs spread just enough for that, or in a sitting position.

She has the standard DD softer-molded breasts that most Nanma dolls, such as the "Personalities" line, have--they look even bigger since these dolls are a bit on the small side (relatively speaking), and in fact are fairly nice to touch or grope. On a regular human woman who would have to walk around with them, they'd be a little impractical if they weren't filled with air.
Thank for the info, infl8orama!

I would love to see a picture of her inflated, as I am not familiar with any of the Nanma/Personalities dolls. As DollLuver73 has pointed out, we do not get to see many pics of the cheaper inflates. I posted pics of the low-end dolls from Adam&Eve (crappy selection, but at least they show pics of the actual dolls), a couple of which I am familiar with, but posts like these seem to be largely ignored, unfortunately.

Although I am happy to report that my "Extreme Dream" Amy is ALL better now, I still think I'd like to get a backup, especially one that has larger boobs and does oral. After dealing with the Doc Johnson Big Busty's "two-giant-light-bulbs-spaced-one-foot-apart" boobs with solid plastic nipples, I am leery of buying anything based on the box art...

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

I'll see what I can do about getting a few pics. :twisted:

ETA: As they say on the Bud Light TV campaign, here we go!

For more, check out http://www.flickr.com/photos/51597385@N ... 197888137/
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (10).JPG
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (10).JPG (2.25 MiB) Viewed 22916 times
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (7).JPG
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (7).JPG (2.29 MiB) Viewed 22916 times
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (5).JPG
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (5).JPG (2.38 MiB) Viewed 22916 times
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (3).JPG
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (3).JPG (2.34 MiB) Viewed 22916 times
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (1).JPG
Lusty_Busty_Love_Doll (1).JPG (2.51 MiB) Viewed 22916 times
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

GFELube
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1654
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by GFELube »

THANK YOU very much, infl8!

HA ha, I was going to ask if she's the same girl as the pic below from the Nanma site (thanks to tubbienine for posting it in this thread), and then noticed that you had already edited your own pics into your last post.



I will probably be ordering this now, so I thank you for the input.

Gif

User avatar
btqlover
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by btqlover »

infl8orama wrote:I bought one a few weeks ago. She's not bad. Because her legs are not very spread, I don't find her fun in the doggie-style position (though frankly, this may just be me; while I'm not THAT oddly proportioned, I have never had sex with a woman in that position--when we start off in that position, we inevitably change so we can...make contact, as it were), but she's fun on her back, since her legs spread just enough for that, or in a sitting position.

She has the standard DD softer-molded breasts that most Nanma dolls, such as the "Personalities" line, have--they look even bigger since these dolls are a bit on the small side (relatively speaking), and in fact are fairly nice to touch or grope. On a regular human woman who would have to walk around with them, they'd be a little impractical if they weren't filled with air.

Thank you for the info. I showed this to BTQ (my wife) and the Big Titty Queen herself found her to be very attractive. Although the Queen and myself are curious because of our experience with a similar shaped playmate was well frustration. I am bigger than the norm :oops: and wonder at how comfortable entry would be. What would your first hand experience advised before we bring this one over for the party?

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

btqlover wrote:
infl8orama wrote:I bought one a few weeks ago. She's not bad. Because her legs are not very spread, I don't find her fun in the doggie-style position (though frankly, this may just be me; while I'm not THAT oddly proportioned, I have never had sex with a woman in that position--when we start off in that position, we inevitably change so we can...make contact, as it were), but she's fun on her back, since her legs spread just enough for that, or in a sitting position.

She has the standard DD softer-molded breasts that most Nanma dolls, such as the "Personalities" line, have--they look even bigger since these dolls are a bit on the small side (relatively speaking), and in fact are fairly nice to touch or grope. On a regular human woman who would have to walk around with them, they'd be a little impractical if they weren't filled with air.

Thank you for the info. I showed this to BTQ (my wife) and the Big Titty Queen herself found her to be very attractive. Although the Queen and myself are curious because of our experience with a similar shaped playmate was well frustration. I am bigger than the norm :oops: and wonder at how comfortable entry would be. What would your first hand experience advised before we bring this one over for the party?
More length could suit her well. The way she's positioned, I have to adjust a little bit to get to the party, as it were. Girth? Depends on how...erm, girthy you are. I'm fairly average in length, somewhat above average in girth (5.5" long and about 1 1/2" in diameter just behind the glans, if that's not an overshare--and if so, too late now), and the Lusty Busty Love Doll and I fit together well.

If you guys do have a threesome, have a little fun for me (and of course, if you are so inclined, pics are nice too. ;) )
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

User avatar
btqlover
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by btqlover »

Thank for the information. How good are the breasts? Are they the hard shell attachments or the vinyl shell style?

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

btqlover wrote:Thank for the information. How good are the breasts? Are they the hard shell attachments or the vinyl shell style?
The breasts are nice; they're the vinyl shell style, so they feel good to grope, as well as other things (though watch the seams; they're individual pieces). The entire Nanma line now has vinyl shells instead of the hard shells, generally in one of two sizes: the DD or so breasts that the Lusty Busty Love Doll shares with Scarlet Creame, Jenna Bustin, Penelope Pink, Ava Wildhorse and a few others, or the humongous breasts found on the Whitney Wonders, Collossal Katherine, and other BBW dolls.
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

User avatar
btqlover
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by btqlover »

The BBW dolls are well too unrealistic for us despite the mamms on them. I searched the mfg site throughly and they have some interesting playmates for sale.

So, let me ask this, what is your complaints about yours?

And are the oral qualities good?

dollluver73
Ex-Member
Posts: 1505
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:00 am
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by dollluver73 »

btqlover wrote:The BBW dolls are well too unrealistic for us despite the mamms on them. I searched the mfg site throughly and they have some interesting playmates for sale.

So, let me ask this, what is your complaints about yours?

And are the oral qualities good?
So right about the BBW dolls. There needs to be at least one high end vinal BBW doll made but theres not :(

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

dollluver73 wrote:
btqlover wrote:The BBW dolls are well too unrealistic for us despite the mamms on them. I searched the mfg site throughly and they have some interesting playmates for sale.

So, let me ask this, what is your complaints about yours?

And are the oral qualities good?
While her legs are spread enough to make missionary possible, it's just barely enough. I'd love to have a doll similar to this but with her legs spread more, especially since having her legs bent makes her ass extremely grabbable. Also, relocating the doll's (extremely pleasant, at least to me) vagina a little bit further down would make access easier. As a result of these two issues right after I took the above photos, I had myself a little fun, but she also sprung a tiny leak just below the vagina--easily fixed, but a little annoying at the time.

I've had lots of fun so far, but haven't tried oral with the doll. I presume it would be as enjoyable as oral with other dolls with this type of head, which is to say, not bad, but not worth writing home about. (Also: do not write home about having sex with inflatables. If your family doesn't already know, they don't wanna, and if they do, they probably still don't want to hear about it. 8) )

dollluver73 wrote: So right about the BBW dolls. There needs to be at least one high end vinal BBW doll made but theres not :(
I would especially like one that can hold air for a good hard romp. I'm a little heavy (100 kg), but not extremely so. However, my weight plus my...erm, hip strength, as it were...mean I have to be very careful with low-end dolls. With BBW dolls, it's even more difficult, as I can't distribute my weight on my knees and forearms in missionary--the doll is usually too big to let my knees and elbows touch the bed at the same time.

The floor is therefore out of the question.
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

User avatar
btqlover
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by btqlover »

Thank you for all the information. We are considering her and a few others at the moment as an addition to the Letha we have.

User avatar
infl8orama
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by infl8orama »

Oh, I love my Letha! Glad you have one too.
"You never push a noun against a verb without trying to blow up something."
— H.L. Mencken

User avatar
haremlover
Doll Visionary
Doll Visionary
Posts: 16238
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
Location: UK and South of France
Contact:

Re: Lusty Busty love doll

Post by haremlover »

btqlover wrote:Thank you for all the information. We are considering her and a few others at the moment as an addition to the Letha we have.
Hi!

For sitting position, Crazy Razey really cannot be beaten - she's utterly superb and if you're well endowed, then use with just the vinyl sleeve without the insert is really luscious.

Best wishes

HArem

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS