The Doll Forum

fakeid123,
It might be the angle since it is not a straight on view from behind so sort of the train track illusion.
Hopefully another picture can show it better
V/r
Jeff

I'm not usually a fan of such thiccness but I have to say she looks absolutely stunning!

WaffleAnomaly wrote:I'm not usually a fan of such thiccness but I have to say she looks absolutely stunning!

Then you must go to other threads in our section and I am sure you will find your preference.

Kevin

Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.

Stunning indeed. These are nice even for glamor shots. The proportions look very enticing and I'm very interested in raw and placement pics.

bcdedit wrote:I'm very interested in raw and placement pics.

One of the things that sold me on Hitdoll was the fact that they have unedited factory shots of the different body types on their website along with the standard glamour shots. Made everything seem that much more honest and up front.

Yes. To show the products originally is just what we aim to. No tricks, no liars. It is basic in business that customers are able to see what they are going to get.
Glad you appreciate it Ramon. And bcdedit, please let me know if you want to see parts of the H.R. silicone 170.

Kevin

Hitdoll wrote:And bcdedit, please let me know if you want to see parts of the H.R. silicone 170.

Yes, I'd very much like to see parts of the 170 silicone or TPE. I'm really interested to see the anatomical placements and general factory pics. Please link the pics if they are already out there. In fact I am torn between the 151 and 170 at the moment.

It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

RogerSmith wrote:Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.

Actually, ancient Greek and Roman statues never had boobs that big. But, she does have some nice body mass, and some classic curves.

I was actually just looking for 3d scans of classic to renaissance sculptures to suggest for a future doll build.

Colonel Angus wrote:

RogerSmith wrote:Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.

Actually, ancient Greek and Roman statues never had boobs that big. But, she does have some nice body mass, and some classic curves.

I was actually just looking for 3d scans of classic to renaissance sculptures to suggest for a future doll build.

Even so, the sculp still needs some adjustment.

Kevin

Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.

bcdedit wrote:

Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.

Though it is not the doggy pose, I think the photos may show how the placement is. . Kevin

Hitdoll wrote:

bcdedit wrote:

Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.

Though it is not the doggy pose, I think the photos may show how the placement is.

8cc978599ad9b232a36a5e2cff88905.jpg

b78e9bad02c59e84f095538cff1247f.jpg

.

f76e093c98f34c886350b70dc8b33cd.jpg

Kevin

You guys are planning on updating the anus opening to look more realistic, aren't you?

Hitdoll wrote: Though it is not the doggy pose, I think the photos may show how the placement is.

Thanks Kevin!
It could be the angle but the vag looks to be a little too far to the front. The details are nice though.