The Doll Forum

anatoly wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 12:24 pm I'm just learning about weight-reduction.

From what I've read so far, it seems like a bad idea in a lot of cases. Having a little bit of foam in the core maybe is OK, but after a certain amount it looks like it's too much? If a doll is too light, does it get less life like and lose realism? Also, don't want the silicone to separate from the foam.

To be safe, I'm steering away from dolls with “super reduced weight."

I'm the opposite. I'm willing to compromise on some things if the weight is really getting to a workable point. The XT 163F is VERY manageable and the details are really, really well done. It's not my preferred body style sculpt but this one is really close: https://www.rosemarydoll.com/product/16 ... doll-lola/. That's 53lbs and the only anatomical "anomaly" is the narrowed waist to my eye. I almost pulled the trigger last week. I PREFER the more aptly proportioned 160H and 162G XT models but they are 70lbs so I'll wait and see if XT continues to reduce weight on them. Interestingly, these are considered "fat" by the manufacturer. I would love to have 5-10 more pounds off these without losing the current shape.

I think that LHP is more crucial.

under 25kg would be best.

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:02 pm I think that LHP is more crucial.

Weight reduction and geed LHP are not conflicting…

To me ideal weight for fullbody doll would be like 20kg and torso like 10-15. The added weight doesn't really matter that much and only complicates things like carrying to washing and storaging. Also changing different sex positions is hard on heavy doll so it's not practical.

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 8:36 am

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:02 pm I think that LHP is more crucial.

Weight reduction and geed LHP are not conflicting…

I reduce weight with a hoist above my bed where I lift my dolls very easily.
The LHP is crusial for me because I use my dolls for sex more than having them on display or photographing.
No fun if the vagina is where the belly button is, which makes spooning and doggy imposible.
Those dolls that are optimal in misionary only and don't give the backside sex option in a good way are in my opinion not worth the money.

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:25 am

jeep2639 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 8:36 am

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:02 pm I think that LHP is more crucial.

Weight reduction and geed LHP are not conflicting…

I reduce weight with a hoist above my bed where I lift my dolls very easily.
The LHP is crusial for me because I use my dolls for sex more than having them on display or photographing.
No fun if the vagina is where the belly button is, which makes spooning and doggy imposible.
Those dolls that are optimal in misionary only and don't give the backside sex option in a good way are in my opinion not worth the money.

I get it. It only emphasizes the point that we are all different in what we need from those dolls and how we use them. Like you, to me, sex is one of the main reasons I bought a doll. That's why they are called "sex dolls," I think... I don't have the luxury of building a hoist above my bed (or do it without my wife noticing...). I, for example, really love the missionary position more than any other, and most dolls are really good at that. I don't like anal or oral, for example, while some people do.

By the way, all I was suggesting it not that one was more (or less) important than the other, just that they are not coming at the expense of one another.

I would like to invert the question of this thread: How much doll can I get for, let's say, 40 kgs? Could you make a voluptous 170 E with a waist of 75 cm? Could you make a realistic, athletic 180 A body with a waist of 60 cm? If yes, then please do it!