The Doll Forum

168c in tpe

Leatherman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:48 pm 168c in tpe

LHP looks as good if not better than most brands. Could be better, but not anywhere near terrible.

JustDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 12:13 pm Would you guys be interested in a review? I guess I could work on one for this weekend.

I would very much love to see a review and comparison with the D4E 160.

Testacleez wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:55 am

Jugo wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 9:27 pm i'm not sure you can draw that conclusion from a photo of a standing doll, look at this as an example, standing: download/file.php?id=1202436&mode=view, doggy; download/file.php?id=1207620&mode=view. The result depends as much on the sculpt as it does on where the hip joint is located within the pelvic area. I also think it depends on if the doll is cast with straight or bent hips.

Woah. Hold up. It's that the 168c jsd? The tits look bigger in the picture.

No, it's from a different manufacturer who has good LHP

JustDude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 12:13 pm
Would you guys be interested in a review? I guess I could work on one for this weekend.

That would be awesome. I did a review of my own doll a while ago where I tried to take pictures of LHP and gaping as you experience them when the doll is positioned for sexual use, not for photography: viewtopic.php?t=171840

Jugo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 2:40 am

Testacleez wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 11:55 am

Jugo wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 9:27 pm i'm not sure you can draw that conclusion from a photo of a standing doll, look at this as an example, standing: download/file.php?id=1202436&mode=view, doggy; download/file.php?id=1207620&mode=view. The result depends as much on the sculpt as it does on where the hip joint is located within the pelvic area. I also think it depends on if the doll is cast with straight or bent hips.

Woah. Hold up. It's that the 168c jsd? The tits look bigger in the picture.

No, it's from a different manufacturer who has good LHP

Oh. I know which one that is now. The picture makes that sculpt definitely seem different though. Maybe it's the tan that makes it seem more like the jsd 148cm

Leatherman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:48 pm 168c in tpe

Thank you for the picture I could not find one for the silicone version .. To me its not pretty, plus the lighting is pretty bad in that picture, you can just vaguely see the ass cheek starting above the anal hole .. not a great look, I would not even call that good ... it should simply not be done this way.. no excuses .. i would give it a 6 out of 10 just 'OK' for me .. Not good enough for me to buy it,

That is why I contacted them, because this is a beautiful detailed sculpt, that is better then most, and it deserves amazing LHP, just like the doll Jugo showed.

horrorhorry wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:37 pm

Leatherman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:48 pm 168c in tpe

Thank you for the picture I could not find one for the silicone version .. To me its not pretty, plus the lighting is pretty bad in that picture, you can just vaguely see the ass cheek starting above the anal hole .. not a great look, I would not even call that good ... it should simply not be done this way.. no excuses .. i would give it a 6 out of 10 just 'OK' for me .. Not good enough for me to buy it,

That is why I contacted them, because this is a beautiful detailed sculpt, that is better then most, and it deserves amazing LHP, just like the doll Jugo showed.

I can only speak for the 168 silicone, but the LHP is definitely better than most brands that I see. The LHs are also visually appealing.

Here are some from mine.

JustDude wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:44 am

horrorhorry wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:37 pm

Leatherman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:48 pm 168c in tpe

Thank you for the picture I could not find one for the silicone version .. To me its not pretty, plus the lighting is pretty bad in that picture, you can just vaguely see the ass cheek starting above the anal hole .. not a great look, I would not even call that good ... it should simply not be done this way.. no excuses .. i would give it a 6 out of 10 just 'OK' for me .. Not good enough for me to buy it,

That is why I contacted them, because this is a beautiful detailed sculpt, that is better then most, and it deserves amazing LHP, just like the doll Jugo showed.

I can only speak for the 168 silicone, but the LHP is definitely better than most brands that I see. The LHs are also visually appealing.

Here are some from mine.

DSC00325.jpg

20230915_235017.jpg

Hi JustDude

thank you for the picture, looks a lot better than the TPE version, it's weird that there is no official picture like this. all manufacturers should show all angels more.

And you are right there are a lot of doll makers that are a lot worse on LHP.

Its weird the 168 is based on the 148 .. and to me 148 looks a bit better down below in detail, just how the anal hole is sculpted, less round and more variety in detail, the detail surrounding the opening is also larger it looks almost real ( Direct copy of a real person maybe ?? ) ...more shapes and little folds and vagina lips are bit thicker, also some more detail there if you look closely on the lips some wrinkles some fine details , they don't seem to share the same design,

So on its own the 168 looks Ok/good only comparing to the smaller 148 they lost some detail.

what do you guys/girls think ?

horrorhorry wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:04 pm

JustDude wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:44 am

horrorhorry wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 7:37 pm

Leatherman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 1:48 pm 168c in tpe

DSC00325.jpg

20230915_235017.jpg

Hi JustDude


what do you guys/girls think ?

I think whatever model you like best there aren't many brands out there that I'd rather take pussy shots of, because Jiusheng do them aesthetically very well.

Imho that would make "the perfect doll", at least for most of us
https://instagram.com/millasofiafin