www.wmdolls.com

VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

WM dolls was establish on 2012, we have own production base (located center of Greater Bay Area, Guangdong, China), which is one of the most professional and the biggest factory of realistic sex dolls in the world.
As pioneered TPE used and many famous brands' dolls manufacturer, We have been focusing on customer experience, and continue to work hard to develop new functions for dolls.
We have many patents and independently developed exclusive functions, Such as Breathing feature, Ball Joints Hand Skeleton, Real Oral Sex(ROS) Head, etc.
Website: www.wmdolls.com

Should WM172D vagina be fixed?

No. It looks fine.
30
38%
Yes. WM should make some changes to make it smaller, less exposed.
48
62%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
Mau5
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:20 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Mau5 »

mandos wrote: Hmm, we should probably hire a test panel of doggy connoisseurs, what do you think? :lying:
Hire? I would have volunteered, but getting paid for it is even better! :mrgreen:

andy-df
Contributing Poster
Contributing Poster
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:44 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by andy-df »

The unnatural shape of the vagina on WM172D is the first thing I notices when viewing this body. I do believe it needs a refresh.

Luke-84
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Luke-84 »

Edit: nevermind.

Cubiko
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:54 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Cubiko »

The factory has been working overtime for this one and the new mould is finished. I got some photos but they didn’t really show much so I requested some new ones. Hang on.

User avatar
Zippy81
Doll Elder
Doll Elder
Posts: 2435
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:16 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Zippy81 »

I think that the look is weird somewhat.. BUT I bet it reduces the gaping hole affect when the legs are spread!

User avatar
Android18
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 5:22 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Android18 »

She has a great figure. But that puff stoped me from pulling the trigger. The search continues for my second. That look is just not my prefernce.

User avatar
Doll Master
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1604
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:16 pm
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Doll Master »

mandos wrote:The factory has been working overtime for this one and the new mould is finished. I got some photos but they didn’t really show much so I requested some new ones. Hang on.
I'm dying with anticipation mandos. If there are any new developments please let us know.

:o :) :lol: 8)

Cubiko
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:54 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Cubiko »

Here are some fresh photos of I think the 2nd or 3rd doll to come out of the new mould. I do not have this doll so any future photos of this doll will have to be taken by the factory or some other photographer.

The vagina of the D is still a bit "meatier" than the B, it was designed this way, this is also well inside the norm. To me this looks much better, especially under a pair of panties - creating a nice and subtle cameltoe :whistle:

But what has been changed is the two "seam" lines that went across her lower tummy where it looked like the crotch area had been glued on and had this unnatural looking crease. It has been smoothed out so looks natural. We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.

User avatar
curiousswede
Doll Mentor
Doll Mentor
Posts: 1848
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 11:07 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by curiousswede »

mandos wrote:Here are some fresh photos of I think the 2nd or 3rd doll to come out of the new mould. I do not have this doll so any future photos of this doll will have to be taken by the factory or some other photographer.

The vagina of the D is still a bit "meatier" than the B, it was designed this way, this is also well inside the norm. To me this looks much better, especially under a pair of panties - creating a nice and subtle cameltoe :whistle:

But what has been changed is the two "seam" lines that went across her lower tummy where it looked like the crotch area had been glued on and had this unnatural looking crease. It has been smoothed out so looks natural. We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.
I think it looks great, and for me TPE vaginas are all about the feeling inside of them. :whistle: If it was a silicone that looked that bad then I would understand the frustration but TPE vaginas just do not have the same level of details AFAIK. Do you know what waist size WM172D have? 60cm or wider?

I am looking for a busty gal and this one has been on my radar! 8)

Pumpkinpatch
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:18 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Pumpkinpatch »

I think there should be options!
Just as breast size is an important variant so is
vagina placement and appearance as are faces hair color style
Eye color makeup
The manufacturer that is able to please the majority
will make the most sales! The competition begins!
It's great to have ready to ship options on in stock dolls
but as improvements are made we are moved to trade up!

Pumpkinpatch
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:18 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Pumpkinpatch »

Options are important !!!
Just like measurements Hieght Breast Waist Hips Wieght!!!
Skin color ! Facial expressions!
Puting vagina in three places would solve problems
I'm not an acrobat and would like ease of penetration in various positions
So front higher in closed leg position
One between legs in legs raised position
One middle of buttocks for spooning position
Each of different texture
Just a suggestion!

User avatar
gh0stinthewires
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2020 2:34 pm

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by gh0stinthewires »

mandos wrote: We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.
Now she looks perfect!

:razz:

Cubiko
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:54 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by Cubiko »

mandos wrote:Height: 172 cm (about 5´ 8")
Weight: 38kg (about 84 lbs)
Bust: 89 cm (about 35")
Waist: 61 cm (about 24")
Hips: 88 cm (about 34,5")

User avatar
dreamer from Russia
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:57 am
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by dreamer from Russia »

I can’t wait to see the photo session of the finished work.
AF Doll 162.

User avatar
lover1
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 5:14 pm
Location: Central Europe
Contact:

Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?

Post by lover1 »

I wonder if the official photos will be replaced after correcting the doll's vagina ;)
No Faceapp please. I want to see dolls, not artificial smiles.

Bodies: WM 166C tan, WM 163C tan
Heads: YL Allura 193, YL 315, WM 336
Looking for great asian kisser face.

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS