Hire? I would have volunteered, but getting paid for it is even better!mandos wrote: Hmm, we should probably hire a test panel of doggy connoisseurs, what do you think?
VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
- Doll Master
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1604
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
I'm dying with anticipation mandos. If there are any new developments please let us know.mandos wrote:The factory has been working overtime for this one and the new mould is finished. I got some photos but they didn’t really show much so I requested some new ones. Hang on.
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
The vagina of the D is still a bit "meatier" than the B, it was designed this way, this is also well inside the norm. To me this looks much better, especially under a pair of panties - creating a nice and subtle cameltoe
But what has been changed is the two "seam" lines that went across her lower tummy where it looked like the crotch area had been glued on and had this unnatural looking crease. It has been smoothed out so looks natural. We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.
- curiousswede
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 11:07 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
I think it looks great, and for me TPE vaginas are all about the feeling inside of them. If it was a silicone that looked that bad then I would understand the frustration but TPE vaginas just do not have the same level of details AFAIK. Do you know what waist size WM172D have? 60cm or wider?mandos wrote:Here are some fresh photos of I think the 2nd or 3rd doll to come out of the new mould. I do not have this doll so any future photos of this doll will have to be taken by the factory or some other photographer.
The vagina of the D is still a bit "meatier" than the B, it was designed this way, this is also well inside the norm. To me this looks much better, especially under a pair of panties - creating a nice and subtle cameltoe
But what has been changed is the two "seam" lines that went across her lower tummy where it looked like the crotch area had been glued on and had this unnatural looking crease. It has been smoothed out so looks natural. We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.
I am looking for a busty gal and this one has been on my radar!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:18 am
- Contact:
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Just as breast size is an important variant so is
vagina placement and appearance as are faces hair color style
Eye color makeup
The manufacturer that is able to please the majority
will make the most sales! The competition begins!
It's great to have ready to ship options on in stock dolls
but as improvements are made we are moved to trade up!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:18 am
- Contact:
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Just like measurements Hieght Breast Waist Hips Wieght!!!
Skin color ! Facial expressions!
Puting vagina in three places would solve problems
I'm not an acrobat and would like ease of penetration in various positions
So front higher in closed leg position
One between legs in legs raised position
One middle of buttocks for spooning position
Each of different texture
Just a suggestion!
- gh0stinthewires
- Active Poster
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2020 2:34 pm
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Now she looks perfect!mandos wrote: We also re-did and lengthened the vagina opening a bit, going even a bit further backwards so it will accommodate an insert as well as look more visually pleasing as it closes the gap between the vagina and anus that was unnaturally big.
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
mandos wrote:Height: 172 cm (about 5´ 8")
Weight: 38kg (about 84 lbs)
Bust: 89 cm (about 35")
Waist: 61 cm (about 24")
Hips: 88 cm (about 34,5")
- dreamer from Russia
- Senior Member
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:57 am
- Contact:
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Re: VOTE: WM172D - Should vagina be redesigned?
Bodies: WM 166C tan, WM 163C tan
Heads: YL Allura 193, YL 315, WM 336
Looking for great asian kisser face.