Looking at his first posting, Soap was lucky that he #1 got his doll ordered/shipped before all this issues with the gel filling came up, #2 that his hot lady anyhow arrived in perfect shape at his placeJustAPerson14 wrote:How do you guys all get the gel breast option with a bigger cup then E? This one has L. All vendors I am looking at block orders with gel option and bigger cup than E, so I am waiting and waiting and waiting... :'(
YL-166 Review
- MoviePilot
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
it would be interesting to see what one of these looks like alongside the super popular WM166C (contrasts at the same height)
I know there are many reasons to choose a doll and many ways in which it can satisfy.. but I have to ask: how is the LHP ? (I myself have a 'poor-LHP' doll, but it's still 100% worth owning)
I dont think any 1 doll can get *everything* right.. legs, curves, practical weight, LHP.. one has to make tradeoffs.
interestingly whilst these are possibly of the sort that looks "surgically enhanced","exagerated", they dont look as oversized as on the taller WM170M (eg they wont sag so much when vertical). perhaps its that they're more plausible at a smaller total volume , despite diameter relative to height, waist etc. Issues of mass vs surface area and lengths mean proportions dont scale the same with height (An elephant is not a scaled up mouse plus a trunk , and so on) maybe thats it
- MoviePilot
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
Maybe this helps you.curious_person wrote:I know there are many reasons to choose a doll and many ways in which it can satisfy.. but I have to ask: how is the LHP ? (I myself have a 'poor-LHP' doll, but it's still 100% worth owning)
I dont think any 1 doll can get *everything* right.. legs, curves, practical weight, LHP.. one has to make tradeoffs.
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
ok thanks. my next question was "how far did you have to angle her back to get that" but if I understood right, it's the rear view from this side view you posted. you're right it doesn't look as bad as some others.Maybe this helps you.
- MoviePilot
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 8:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
Yep, I didn't change anything except the camera position and, well, later making the back view greyscalecurious_person wrote:but if I understood right, it's the rear view from this side view you postedMaybe this helps you.
Re: YL-166 Review
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 4:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: YL-166 Review
How is yours?Louis_V wrote:Hey there Soap - How is your 166 holding up, particularly the gel breasts?
Re: YL-166 Review
Doing very well.Louis_V wrote:Hey there Soap - How is your 166 holding up, particularly the gel breasts?