WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
- Headless_Too
- Active Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
My 157b is opposite though, EVO joints are stiffer than shoulders which is how it should be. I'll just have to exercise her shoulder joints and hope they loosen up a little.the living tribunal wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 2:57 am Very nice
Regarding the EVO shoulders: coming from a Kimber (August 2021) to a WM girl (had her 3 weeks), getting used to that was hard. I found the arms have to be down straight by her side to move the lower shoulder joints without moving the EVO joints upward and even then, it takes practice.
Thank you. I was going to go for the extra soft option but the vendor talked me out of it. Maybe there is a level in between? She's definitely not as firm as my 157b, certainly not complaining about either one though. Could just be my imagination, there is more to this girl in height, weight, boob size; could just make things feel softer as a result?
Thanks, she's fitting in very well. Definitely a keeper! haha
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834
WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143
WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
- Headless_Too
- Active Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
It was, but I had to ask for pictures without it there since every one they initially sent had that sign in the way of the view. lol I'm like I'm buying a doll, not a sign! haha
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834
WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143
WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157
- thunderkiss69
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
Great to know, like ZZ Top once sang, I'm looking for some tush, but I'm not not a butthole guy. I do love the more closed vagina that doesn't gap and has the flaps. Flaps down when not in flight.Headless_Too wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 1:15 am
Thanks. Yes, boobs are super realistic. Nice little droop and the weight of them is very pleasing to the hands. The gel is amazing. LHP from behind favors the ass but it feels natural. She's got the looks, and she's functional. Missionary is very nice. The vaginal entrance could be opened up to make entry easier, but for as small as the hole is it isn't too tight and feels like you would expect. It's like a real woman in so many ways. Yeah, I'm pretty happy with her. haha
I haven't weighed her, but she's not difficult for me to move around really. She's definitely heavier than my 157b but that's to be expected. She's MUCH lighter than the Starpery Mira I had for a minute and she's wonderfully jiggly in all the right places. Butt has a nice bounce when slapped. I think they saved some weight by making the arms very thin, proportionately small compared to the legs and thighs; those are very well sculpted BTW.
Looks like the 164F is on the shortlist! Thanks, Headless.
Visit the girls' Instagram page.
Stupid Positivity: Expecting people to learn new things is dangerous and oppressive.
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
- Attachments
-
- 164cm5ft5_F-cup_TPE_Sex_Doll_-_Keynes_(17).jpg (105.97 KiB) Viewed 1298 times
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 7:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
- Rock13
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8123
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:19 pm
- Location: Big Sky Country
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
Looks like Head #398 to me. Check out Leatherman's thread for Stevie, Nirodha's thread for Agnés, or mine for Kendall if you want to see some owner images.
Link to Hadleigh's photo thread
Link to Harper's photo thread
Link to Kendall's photo thread
Link to the H2K Ranch
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
- Rock13
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8123
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:19 pm
- Location: Big Sky Country
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
When I received mine with zero makeup (Kendall) she looked really young to me, mostly because she has big wide eyes and a few slightly puffy features on her face. Luckily, makeup made the difference, so I think that the factory standard makeup might prevent that.
Link to Hadleigh's photo thread
Link to Harper's photo thread
Link to Kendall's photo thread
Link to the H2K Ranch
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
It always amazed me how a given head could look so different in the hands of others. I've seen the #273 look entirely different than the Mfr photos of her just by judicious use of makeup, eye color and wig change or, perhaps a head band or ear rings, etc. Voice your choice, I suppose. That's what it's all about.Rock13 wrote: ↑Sat May 28, 2022 9:09 pmWhen I received mine with zero makeup (Kendall) she looked really young to me, mostly because she has big wide eyes and a few slightly puffy features on her face. Luckily, makeup made the difference, so I think that the factory standard makeup might prevent that.
- Headless_Too
- Active Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll
As others have mentioned, yes, it is head 398. Have 2 of them now.
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834
WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143
WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157