NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection

haremlover · Post by **haremlover** » Fri Dec 02, 2022 5:59 pm

Evelyn is a most extraordinary and wonderfully effective face. Congratulations!

It looks as though with the new improvements my review of Evelyn would be very much different from the first Summit, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWQ4Zma7cUM and possibly combines the best of the DS167 shown there https://youtu.be/OWQ4Zma7cUM?t=714 with the best of the Summit.

A very interesting development and looking forward to hearing more.

Best wishes and all encouragement

Harem

HappyWabbit · Post by **HappyWabbit** » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:59 am

Do you have any videos showing the softness of your new soft Silicone? Thanks

HappyWabbit · Post by **HappyWabbit** » Thu Feb 02, 2023 9:24 pm

Do you have any videos showing the softness of your new soft Silicone? Thanks

Bumping question I also bumped our PM conversation as a reminder thank you

Kazuya · Post by **Kazuya** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 3:43 am

Very short but might give you an idea

Kazuya · Post by **Kazuya** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 3:44 am

Here’s another better video

ZZ48UUP · Post by **ZZ48UUP** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 7:17 pm

Wow! I mean WOW! Like haremlover, I too have a Summit Series. Her realism exceeds all of my other dolls including another manufacturer from China that is just as expensive and the US company that recently moved.

If you've managed to develop a soft silicone without sacrificing any realism, than this truly is a game changer for the high end of the silicone market.

I just wish I knew this in December before placing another order with a different manufacturer known for lightweight silicone dolls.

Groan!!

King Solo · Post by **King Solo** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 8:36 pm

The level of realism here is quite impressive; mixed in with a softer silicone makes this a game changer and is actually starting to pique my interest in the possibilities of silicone. Especially if this new silicone is soft and stretchy without the fear of it tearing as easily as what's currently available.

TwoReflections · Post by **TwoReflections** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:17 am

Kazuya wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 3:43 am Very short but might give you an idea

This is not very soft at all. Or rather... the skin seems soft, but the breast itself is hard. I wonder what they use inside? Because it doesn't seem like they use jelly like their top competitors.

Dastardlydave · Post by **Dastardlydave** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:36 am

Beautieful and so realistic looks like the real wonderwoman

austismtx · Post by **austismtx** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am

For $8000 at least give me a titanium or aluminum skeleton with a bone structure like a rib cage and spine. Make the boobs or butt actually jiggle like real body parts. Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.

Kazuya · Post by **Kazuya** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:43 am

austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.

You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?

King Solo · Post by **King Solo** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:26 am

Kazuya wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:43 am
austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.
You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?

Yep, they just use really petite models for their scans .... But seriously, just imagine if a thick Western woman agreed to offer to use her scan. Yeah, I know weight always becomes an issue, but I'm pretty sure that model would become extremely popular here in the West.

austismtx · Post by **austismtx** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 am

Kazuya wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:43 am
austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.
You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?

Okay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.

Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.

If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.

ThatOneGuy · Post by **ThatOneGuy** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:33 am

austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 am
Kazuya wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:43 am
austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.
You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?
Okay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.

Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.

If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.

You honestly have no clue what you are talking about. 3D laser scanners that can be used on humans cost a metric fuckton of money. There is no "renting" one. It's a giant machine you install into your facility and it costs multiple millions of dollars. You can not buy the "marketing wank" all you want, but the machines are that accurate. $500 ebay sellers can't get the level of detail and craftsmanship that is in these dolls. I agree however that 8k for a sex doll that sucks at sex is ridiculous. However, 8k sound about right for a wax museum level mannequin. Also, the company has posted photos and videos of their dolls sitting right next to the models and have even shown the entire process on social media. You should probably know what you are talking about before you just spout off nonsense.

Kazuya · Post by **Kazuya** » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:47 am

austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 am
Kazuya wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:43 am
austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:37 am Or how about just real life body dimensions and not a 24in ribcage on a 5’7 adult woman??

But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.
You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?
Okay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.

Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.

If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.

Do you mean like this?
Indeed, there is nothing to stop other manufacturers rising to the challenge to make hyper realistic dolls. Goodness knows it’s a gap in the market that needs filling, besides what Exdoll are doing. But I suppose to use a car analogy, the masses will buy the cheaper lower spec cars in their millions. Not everyone wants, or can afford a Ferrari.