NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Moderator: jiayi
- haremlover
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 16238
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: UK and South of France
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
It looks as though with the new improvements my review of Evelyn would be very much different from the first Summit, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWQ4Zma7cUM and possibly combines the best of the DS167 shown there https://youtu.be/OWQ4Zma7cUM?t=714 with the best of the Summit.
A very interesting development and looking forward to hearing more.
Best wishes and all encouragement
Harem
Chloé's book
is available from The-Doll-House
- - - -
Here's Coverdoll Yolanda
- - - -
Reviews for:
-DS-OR-JY-SY-Jarliet-Vivid-SM-SE-ZOne-JM-Sino-Sanhui-Pipedream--XY-WM-Elsa Babe-SM Silicone Siliko-XYcolo-Starpery-Elsa Babe-FutureDoll-Zelex-Irontech-FJ Doll
- - - -
YouTube Doll Review Channel
-https://www.youtube.com/@sexdoll-reviews-
- HappyWabbit
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
- HappyWabbit
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Bumping question I also bumped our PM conversation as a reminder thank you
- Kazuya
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:23 am
- Location: East Anglia, United Kindom
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
- Attachments
-
- 乳房柔软度.mov
- (31.06 MiB) Downloaded 90 times
- Kazuya
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:23 am
- Location: East Anglia, United Kindom
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
- Attachments
-
- IMG_7410.MOV
- (5.9 MiB) Downloaded 184 times
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
If you've managed to develop a soft silicone without sacrificing any realism, than this truly is a game changer for the high end of the silicone market.
I just wish I knew this in December before placing another order with a different manufacturer known for lightweight silicone dolls.
Groan!!
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:32 am
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
But honestly I don’t see any difference in this brand over something that costs $750.
https://richardjohnson.photography/
Katelyn's Thread DC170B
Madison's Thread DC170G
- Kazuya
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:23 am
- Location: East Anglia, United Kindom
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
You do know that the clone collection are clones of real humans using scanners (with +/- tolerance of 3’mm according to their marketing)?
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Yep, they just use really petite models for their scans .... But seriously, just imagine if a thick Western woman agreed to offer to use her scan. Yeah, I know weight always becomes an issue, but I'm pretty sure that model would become extremely popular here in the West.
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Okay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.
Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.
If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.
https://richardjohnson.photography/
Katelyn's Thread DC170B
Madison's Thread DC170G
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 11:32 am
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
You honestly have no clue what you are talking about. 3D laser scanners that can be used on humans cost a metric fuckton of money. There is no "renting" one. It's a giant machine you install into your facility and it costs multiple millions of dollars. You can not buy the "marketing wank" all you want, but the machines are that accurate. $500 ebay sellers can't get the level of detail and craftsmanship that is in these dolls. I agree however that 8k for a sex doll that sucks at sex is ridiculous. However, 8k sound about right for a wax museum level mannequin. Also, the company has posted photos and videos of their dolls sitting right next to the models and have even shown the entire process on social media. You should probably know what you are talking about before you just spout off nonsense.austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 amOkay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.
Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.
If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.
- Kazuya
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:23 am
- Location: East Anglia, United Kindom
- Contact:
Re: NEW doll from Our RealClone Collection
Do you mean like this?austismtx wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 amOkay? What's stopping a cheap brand like SM Doll from hiring a model, renting a 3D scanner, and making molds off that 3D model instead of their artist drawn 3D models? Nothing. They all do that for the base structure and then edit off that. Most hire cheap/free models with not so "perfect" bodies that's why the breast will CLEARLY look saggy, but have no sag as they attached the breast in editing.
Same with butts. Zero butt cleveage but then it'll stick out... edited 3d scan off a model with no butt.
Also I don't believe the marketing wank for two seconds about "tolerance of 3mm". Where's the stretch marks and cellulite? Why are the breasts perfectly symmetrical there's no a woman on planet earth with perfectly mirrored boobs one is always bigger than the other. It's all bullshit lies to charge $8000 when even $500 ebay sellers use exactly the same process.
If they were so proud of their work, they would show the nude model next to the doll bragging how exact it is. Yet, none of those images exist and you'll never get one. I would love to see raw unedited video of the 3D scanning process. Anything, but all you'll get is a runaround.
Indeed, there is nothing to stop other manufacturers rising to the challenge to make hyper realistic dolls. Goodness knows it’s a gap in the market that needs filling, besides what Exdoll are doing. But I suppose to use a car analogy, the masses will buy the cheaper lower spec cars in their millions. Not everyone wants, or can afford a Ferrari.