WM 174g LPH looks like?

[Olivier 2595]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

[war201987]

viewtopic.php?t=171124

viewtopic.php?t=119567

If they dont show it maybe they hide a bad LHP.

[King Solo]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Here, this might help https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... 86ebc9fde1

[Olivier 2595]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Here, this might help https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... 86ebc9fde1

I heard that the missionary position is impossible because the LPH is too low. Apparently only the doggy style position is good. I don't know how much truth there is in this

[Olivier 2595]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Here, this might help https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php? ... 86ebc9fde1

I heard that the missionary position is impossible because the LPH is too low. Apparently only the doggy style position is good. I don't know how much truth there is in this

[Phossil]

I own a 174G, it has good lhp but I do think it could be slightly better. Every position is fine however I never did anything from the side so I can't say anything about that. I still recommend this doll.

[Siliconeman]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Hi!

You can find many images of my WM174G Cecilia doll here:
viewtopic.php?t=143319&hilit=meet+cecilia

In my opinion WM174G doll is one of the better WM´s dolls. Her LHP looks good, but her labia is very much recessed between her legs and therefore she is not as much "available" as some of the best LHP dolls. Her vaginal canal is longest that I have seen so this is perfect doll for well-equipped members. When opening her legs this doll has trademark WM pussy spread and in if I remember right when her legs are turned to 90 degrees to doggie position her anal canal makes very unrealistic sharp turn downwards. This can be seen on my images.

All in all, a very good doll but I would not rank her to be at top 10 in dollworld

Cheers!

Sili

[Olivier 2595]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Hi!

You can find many images of my WM174G Cecilia doll here:
viewtopic.php?t=143319&hilit=meet+cecilia

In my opinion WM174G doll is one of the better WM´s dolls. Her LHP looks good, but her labia is very much recessed between her legs and therefore she is not as much "available" as some of the best LHP dolls. Her vaginal canal is longest that I have seen so this is perfect doll for well-equipped members. When opening her legs this doll has trademark WM pussy spread and in if I remember right when her legs are turned to 90 degrees to doggie position her anal canal makes very unrealistic sharp turn downwards. This can be seen on my images.

All in all, a very good doll but I would not rank her to be at top 10 in dollworld

Cheers!

Sili

is her vagina very loose? what does penetration look like? whether it is tight or loose

[Olivier 2595]

What LPH looks like in the WM 174G doll? Is it easy to play with her in bed? Does the doll have limited positions? I like the doll very much and I would love to have it. Does anyone have photos in different positions, with legs spread, etc.?

Hi!

You can find many images of my WM174G Cecilia doll here:
viewtopic.php?t=143319&hilit=meet+cecilia

In my opinion WM174G doll is one of the better WM´s dolls. Her LHP looks good, but her labia is very much recessed between her legs and therefore she is not as much "available" as some of the best LHP dolls. Her vaginal canal is longest that I have seen so this is perfect doll for well-equipped members. When opening her legs this doll has trademark WM pussy spread and in if I remember right when her legs are turned to 90 degrees to doggie position her anal canal makes very unrealistic sharp turn downwards. This can be seen on my images.

All in all, a very good doll but I would not rank her to be at top 10 in dollworld

Cheers!

Sili

are all sexual positions available? Are there any limitations?

[Siliconeman]

Missionary is easier than doggy, because her labia is a bit recessed between her legs a you can see on my pictures. Well, with all dolls missionary is easier than doggy, even with perfect LHP girls.

Maybe you worry too much. WM174G is a very good doll and I am sure you will find a way to be with her.

cheers!

Sili

[curious_person]

Its important to note this varies between *users* . Different dolls will suit different people better or worse.

I will tell you i've enjoyed my WM174G enough to want a twin,

But I will also tell you out of 4 dolls, the WM172D remains the best experience for me, because it just seems to fit my body better, despite her having 'bad' LHP (by consensus). I can get into her vagina in both missionary and prone, because its flat (not bending inside), and the hips/ass dont get in the way.
For me, missionary with WM172D feels better than doggy with WM174G, and missionary with WM174G is almost impossible.
visually, WM174G's LHP *looks* far better (WM172D looks very dissapointing between her legs).

But I've also heard that other people can do things with the WM174G that I can't, as siliconeman reports above his experience with the 174G is almost the exact opposite of mine..

They'd have to give out cross-sections of the doll in various poses for you to construct a foam mockup of the hips or something for you to figure out exactly what is going to happen.

What I will say is that for every doll, there's usually going to be at least one thing the doll can do well for everyone.
I doubt there's any one doll that does everything equally well for all people.

From your list : you're going to have to make a gamble and take a trade-off. WM174G with risk of lower 'play value' but she looks spectacular (I get a lot of pleasure from the dolls just standing around), or WM175D, high confidence that it will be more useable in a larger range of positions,easier to move, but she might look a bit skinny for some (since I got into these doll's I've been corrupted and started to crave more curves)

[Olivier 2595]

Its important to note this varies between *users* . Different dolls will suit different people better or worse.

I will tell you i've enjoyed my WM174G enough to want a twin,

But I will also tell you out of 4 dolls, the WM172D remains the best experience for me, because it just seems to fit my body better, despite her having 'bad' LHP (by consensus). I can get into her vagina in both missionary and prone, because its flat (not bending inside), and the hips/ass dont get in the way.
For me, missionary with WM172D feels better than doggy with WM174G, and missionary with WM174G is almost impossible.
visually, WM174G's LHP *looks* far better (WM172D looks very dissapointing between her legs).

But I've also heard that other people can do things with the WM174G that I can't, as siliconeman reports above his experience with the 174G is almost the exact opposite of mine..

They'd have to give out cross-sections of the doll in various poses for you to construct a foam mockup of the hips or something for you to figure out exactly what is going to happen.

What I will say is that for every doll, there's usually going to be at least one thing the doll can do well for everyone.
I doubt there's any one doll that does everything equally well for all people.

From your list : you're going to have to make a gamble and take a trade-off. WM174G with risk of lower 'play value' but she looks spectacular (I get a lot of pleasure from the dolls just standing around), or WM175D, high confidence that it will be more useable in a larger range of positions,easier to move, but she might look a bit skinny for some (since I got into these doll's I've been corrupted and started to crave more curves)

maybe it's better to choose wm164j?

[curious_person]

maybe it's better to choose wm164j?

myself, I'd still choose 174G over 164J because I enjoy the presence of the doll, even if less fun in bed.
164J gives you the curves + likely very enjoyable in all positions, but less presence

There's also this newer "WM164#16" https://siliconelovers.com/collections/ ... 16-aurelia

- slimmer hips+good LHP - very likely good in bed in all positions
- still more 'hourglass figure' than WM175D
- better body balance than 164J
- 37kg, fine for you IMO.

[King Solo]

Be different, stand out from the rest of the crowd and do us all genuine favor and get the WM 165G

That model is a sleeper and needs a proper introduction and review. ASAP!