Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8421
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
For reference, the placement shown on the left is already in use on your 153 I cup TPE doll. We are confused why an older design was chosen for this doll.
Since in my experience attempting to "correct" LHP on existing sculpts does not work well, I will just put this here in the hopes it is considered for your next design. I am a fan of your brand and hope you will take this into consideration.
Thanks!
-Sete
- silicon
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 3446
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:56 pm
- Location: South East England UK
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
For some reason they seem to not be able to understand that the anus is NOT supposed to be positioned where the vagina should ALWAYS naturally be located.
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8421
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- H_N_Franku
- Active Member
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2024 1:04 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Then, an IronTec official answered the depth of the vagina and anus, to the dismay of all the members....
But then they finally understood what LHP was and corrected the LHP of the silicone dolls to everyone's surprise!
Nowadays, people involved in Irontec themselves talk about LHP!
I wish the Dolls Castle would take a lesson from Irontech!
Irontech 163plus-G TPE Sandra#35 Sarah#67
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Maybe that is why Layla feels right. That and being a Real Lady (wink).mebaru wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:28 pm About 2 years ago, a TDF member asked how LHP was doing on the Irontech forum.
Then, an IronTec official answered the depth of the vagina and anus, to the dismay of all the members....
But then they finally understood what LHP was and corrected the LHP of the silicone dolls to everyone's surprise!
Nowadays, people involved in Irontec themselves talk about LHP!
I wish the Dolls Castle would take a lesson from Irontech!
Current: viewtopic.php?t=178506
First version: viewtopic.php?t=173583
Interested in IronTech? - https://www.irontechdoll.com/?sld=carycme - carycme10 for 10% off
Laura 167cm F S39 ITSRS WR 60kg UltraSoft ITSRS
Darla 159cm E silicone Hedy Starpery
viewtopic.php?t=174942
Newer: viewtopic.php?t=179212
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8421
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
If no one speaks up, and they wonder why the doll isn't selling, someone might conclude the sculpt is the problem. I know there are folks who are tired of us "LHP warriors" but it keeps coming up because it remains annoying bordering on infuriating when an otherwise perfect doll like this comes out.H_N_Franku wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 7:54 pm That LHP is really too bad. They have to know this kind of mistake is make or break for a lot of people. They waste a new mold either way when they can't get it right.
I would literally have one on order if they had gotten this right. Look at those thighs!!!
I shall wait patiently for her 156cm LHP correct cousin to be developed.
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Let them continue to get tired. Bad LHP turns a decent sex doll into a frustrating mannequin.setevoltas wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 1:45 amIf no one speaks up, and they wonder why the doll isn't selling, someone might conclude the sculpt is the problem. I know there are folks who are tired of us "LHP warriors" but it keeps coming up because it remains annoying bordering on infuriating when an otherwise perfect doll like this comes out.H_N_Franku wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 7:54 pm That LHP is really too bad. They have to know this kind of mistake is make or break for a lot of people. They waste a new mold either way when they can't get it right.
I would literally have one on order if they had gotten this right. Look at those thighs!!!
I shall wait patiently for her 156cm LHP correct cousin to be developed.
Hanna: viewtopic.php?t=161099
Zhen: viewtopic.php?t=160371
Sam: viewtopic.php?t=160188
Lapis: viewtopic.php?p=2251699#p2251699
Lulu: viewtopic.php?t=141384
Selene: viewtopic.php?t=178008
- cycleingking
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
I would have loved to add this doll to my collection. I refuse however to purchase a doll with such bad LHP. I hope the direct customer feedback in this thread is beneficial to Dolls Castle's continued success.
-CK
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
- dolls-castle
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:57 am
- Location: Zhongshan, GuangDong, China, 528400
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Hi sete, uhm.... I see it coming,setevoltas wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:13 pm Hello DollsCastle! Several of us were excited to see your new silicone doll release, as it fills a need for a thick, very muscular legged doll without overly large breasts. However, you missed the mark badly on the the doll's LHP. I have attached an edited image in the hopes that you will correct this for future ass oriented dolls, especially in silicone releases, since post-purchase modifications are difficult and cost-prohibitive with silicone.
DC153_improved.jpg
For reference, the placement shown on the left is already in use on your 153 I cup TPE doll. We are confused why an older design was chosen for this doll.
Since in my experience attempting to "correct" LHP on existing sculpts does not work well, I will just put this here in the hopes it is considered for your next design. I am a fan of your brand and hope you will take this into consideration.
Thanks!
-Sete
Email: allum@dolls-castle.com
- cycleingking
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Dolls Castle,dolls-castle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 8:35 pmHi sete, uhm.... I see it coming,setevoltas wrote: ↑Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:13 pm Hello DollsCastle! Several of us were excited to see your new silicone doll release, as it fills a need for a thick, very muscular legged doll without overly large breasts. However, you missed the mark badly on the the doll's LHP. I have attached an edited image in the hopes that you will correct this for future ass oriented dolls, especially in silicone releases, since post-purchase modifications are difficult and cost-prohibitive with silicone.
DC153_improved.jpg
For reference, the placement shown on the left is already in use on your 153 I cup TPE doll. We are confused why an older design was chosen for this doll.
Since in my experience attempting to "correct" LHP on existing sculpts does not work well, I will just put this here in the hopes it is considered for your next design. I am a fan of your brand and hope you will take this into consideration.
Thanks!
-Sete
Is this a subtle hint that this issue will be resolved soon??
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
- dolls-castle
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:57 am
- Location: Zhongshan, GuangDong, China, 528400
- Contact:
Re: Feedback on your new 153cm silicone doll
Email: allum@dolls-castle.com