My thoughts on a small doll...

beardygoat · Post by **beardygoat** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:55 am

she is not the "complete silicone doll, i do not say unfortunately just yet as i like that her fabric covered limbs are foam and featherweight so she is 30 lbs. of fine silicone and 2 lbs of foam and coverings.sweet. poses well too. need tiny props for her. 48 inches ,she is a collectors item for now.so few. sigh.....head shake, frown..
in the mean time i will take fun pictures with her for your amusement. she poses well.

BG

Post by **RainLover** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:07 am

Fun photos!

She has a very endearing, sweet face.

B3F11dolly · Post by **B3F11dolly** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:53 am

whatever you guys discuss here - as long as you skip the underage discussion,
I don't care about that....

but...

not sure how far this is against rules, probably not, but that won't stop me from having a personal opinion... the picture with the girl with hands tied and mouth shut up with sticky tape hurts my female heart. And the one with the girl getting all that cum crap load in her face, if a sketch or comic or not, is just DISGUSTING.

Yuk

Post by **RainLover** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:29 am

Vanessa wrote:not sure how far this is against rules, probably not, but that won't stop me from having a personal opinion... the picture with the girl with hands tied and mouth shut up with sticky tape hurts my female heart. And the one with the girl getting all that cum crap load in her face, if a sketch or comic or not, is just DISGUSTING. Yuk

It's interesting you mention that, because I'd seen those images before, while searching for images, and declined them for the same reasons you gave. You may have noticed that the only ones I personally posted were of Tink by herself, looking like a sexy full-size adult.

I believe we have established that the only Tink we're talking about in this thread is an adult female. Regarding depictions of her, Rule #1 states, in part: "Only artificial representation of human genitalia are allowed." Therefore, I don't think the illustrations of Tink getting a face full are disallowed, but are simply distasteful to you and me, and possible other members too. It's a judgment call each of us makes before posting. Call me old-fashioned or whatever, but I'm just not into the whole cumshot type of imagery. I like sexy traditional poses: face forward, smiling seductively, leaning back to show off the breasts, one leg bent over the other -- that sort of thing. Not surprisingly, that's exactly what Tink is doing in the images I posted.

beardygoat · Post by **beardygoat** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:58 am

thanks for moderating BUT i think you just lost one of the members over his posts removal.? lets not go about this so heavy handed as to acheive that.
some folks do not read the rules ,or understand them properly , and say things better left unsaid. but i believe the fellow thought he was defending the right side of the issue and got pulled for fighting, name calling? sigh,,,,??
i read the old posts before mine and i did not see the violation even with my good eye or i would not have chimed in. it was close but no issue.
. they used a "word" TDF do not like or allow? i understand .it is good.
you know best i guess? perhaps i misses something.

BTW,
image of taped girl is from a film. actors!! why feel for them? they get money for that act.not real!!!!!.sensibilities, sensitivities or not. i am sorry moderators can not pick what to watch like on TV and movies. then your eyes and heart would never be offended on this SEXdoll oriented forum..with a wide range of discussions.
the drawings are just that. silly porn art, you DO have the right to say you hate them. you did. ok, got it. a sensitive moderator.

i sure hope my Cassi did not offend anyone tying up her woman creation holding tools over her..lol. have no fear just dolls at play.
BG

Old_School · Post by **Old_School** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:45 pm

The picture that I posted is of Qi Shu, and is a movie that many kids watched. I guess looking at the still may upset some, but then that's why I mentioned the movie. The POINT I was trying to make, was the ease of carrying a lighter smaller doll. I think that it is not at all distasteful although I can understand a woman's point of view I guess. Still...in the movie he is actually saving her. The bondage section on this forum where dolls are tied up should be just as offensive, which no one seems to mind. I will say that I never post the graphic stuff, cartoon or not.

I really don't want this thread to go that direction though as it is intended for the concept of a small ADULT lighter weight doll. I still think it can be done. I think that if one has a small doll, say like the Cassi Doll, the size of it should only be a concern of the owner and the rest of us should appreciate it for it's beauty and functionality.

Question for all of you though, concerning weight. What does the head of your RD, or even PIB doll weigh? Have you ever weighed it? I still think that an attached head could shave weight, especially when designed with lighter materials.

Post by **RainLover** » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:58 pm

Just for the record, I had no issue with the Qi Shu photo. I knew it was from a movie, and I didn't understand how it could have given Vanessa pains to see it.

My comments in reply to her post were strictly about the Tink illustrations.

Beardygoat, I wasn't aware someone's posts got pulled. I guess I didn't log back in soon enough to see them. I thought your Cassi photos were a fun shoot. I interpreted it as a medical-mechanical scene, with Cassi trying to repair the larger doll.

Old_School, I don't see how being attached would save weight, although I've thought myself that being attached would be more realistic. But maybe there are practical reasons beyond changing eyes or head positioning to have a removable head. Maybe the neck would tear from frequent movement if the head were attached.

zazakell · Post by **zazakell** » Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:35 pm

Vanessa wrote:whatever you guys discuss here - as long as you skip the underage discussion,
I don't care about that....

but...

not sure how far this is against rules, probably not, but that won't stop me from having a personal opinion... the picture with the girl with hands tied and mouth shut up with sticky tape hurts my female heart. And the one with the girl getting all that cum crap load in her face, if a sketch or comic or not, is just DISGUSTING. Yuk

I fully agree with you Vanessa. I think quite a few female members might be offended. I'm a male member and I find the cartoons of Tinkerbell a la bukkake offensive too. The Alarm clock is amusing though. I bet a lot of girls would like to "get off" using an alarm clock. Just think of the money you'd save on batteries.

As far as small dolls go.....have a look at the new Minilovedoll.

zazakell

edit to correct spelling.

timetraveler1 · Post by **timetraveler1** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:27 am

actually i thought Schrade and although i don't care for small dolls , if i was going to buy one this would have been one of them , it's nice looking , as far as durability i don't know about it . it's to bad if he didn't continue making them . someone else mentioned about patrick being a true artist and waiting for him to make one , if he makes one and i think he is going to , everyone has seen his talent and already knows of his good business practice so it will probably be well worth the wait for anyone wanting a smaller size doll.

beardygoat · Post by **beardygoat** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:19 pm

timetraveler1 wrote:actually i thought Schrade and although i don't care for small dolls , if i was going to buy one this would have been one of them , it's nice looking , as far as durability i don't know about it . it's to bad if he didn't continue making them . someone else mentioned about patrick being a true artist and waiting for him to make one , if he makes one and i think he is going to , everyone has seen his talent and already knows of his good business practice so it will probably be well worth the wait for anyone wanting a smaller size doll. :)

i own both now.
my Cassi and a PIB.
both nice. the Cassi skin is somehow 30% softer more squeezable yet durable. in the nicest way. the PIB has great artistic lines and realistic functional face ,soft head and inserts. firm body a bit of softer tits much like the Cassi mtl.
. but Cassi still has a much softer ass and tiny but softish tits also.

so apples and oranges in comparison. both delicious in different ways. so it will depend on PIB's new technology towards softness or not .hard to say they are equal in silicone qualities. actually the Cassi poses better.?
has arms you can at least get to straight out. .my PIB can barely lift her arms 45degrees from the side! but can practicaly bend in half in the middle?
sigh, so again ,depends on your desire as well,pics,sex,etc.

Patrics will be stunning no doubt. and Cassi's are a rare breed.so...guess who will end up ruling.
BG
i will try to take some pics soon of both.