The Doll Forum

As a long time lurker first time poster I've always thought I'd want a loose joint doll. Skimming through this has me as undecided as when first discovering these were options.

When one becomes older and more lazy, sex positions on one's side are comfortable and easy or simply intertwining with one's wife without sex. For this loose joints allow easy movement in bed and easy repositioning as one's wife might through the night intertwining in a different way. I have just got rid of a non-DS soft doll with whom I had arguments and frustrations but regret her departure as she was so loose jointed as to be my favourite to sleep with when my wife is absent.

Best wishes

Harem

Yeah, with no doll experience I had just imagined that a little give at the joints might make for a more realisitc experience in missionary or from behind. Hadn't Thought about that haremlover, but that is one more point weighing toward the loose joint side.

BobbyMcgee wrote:that is one more point weighing toward the loose joint side.

The problem is that a doll with great photographic potential really comes to life unexpectedly. One starts off seeing these dolls very lustfully but then upon arrival they start to get into one's heart and one wants them to come to life. So photography becomes much more important than sex. So then a stiff jointed doll who becomes looser gradually over time satisfies many but it's still nice to have a bedroom doll. DS ladies are _so_ photographic that I favour them for photography and I was lucky in finding a good value second (fourth) hand PIB who in the absence of my departed TPE doll is currently charming me in bed. But I wish she was the new soft silicone . . . and certainly a loose jointed soft silicone DS would be a dream.

Best wishes

Harem