The Doll Forum

I've been looking at this doll and it's beautiful:

https://www.sanhuidolls.com/product-pag ... tured-skin

Is it just me or does the vagina placement seem to be a tiny bit off of anatomical correctness?
If yes, perhaps it has to be because of manufacturing/mold design requirement.

It's not a big issue for me--more just a curiosity.

George from XS Dolls mentioned something about this in the video that he made on the 156cm, so your observations are correct Robert.

I think that the main reason for this is that there were some complaints as to the accessibility of these dolls in the missionary position. Of course, it’s possible that this vagina placement would make the doll less accessible in the doggie position as a result.

It is a bit too far forward (towards her belly button) but its not that bad. Sam is right, doggy position is a bit more tricky than with a real girl.
Here are some pics of the 156 that maybe you haven't seen: picture credit: X/S Dolls

I agree it's not bad. In fact, for some it might be considered a desired feature if someone likes that angle.

What about the Sanhui 145 CM doll? Is it basically the same doll just scaled down a bit?

I can see the seam lines in the picture. Would a more tanned skin tone hide the seam lines from the mold better?

Thank you for sharing those photos. So many doll photos are taken with makeup and perfect lighting that we forget what the doll looks like out of the box.

Well it's not so bad, I consider it anatomically correct in this sense