At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
Quote: “Maybe people who want to buy sex robots need to present the agreement of a couple of doctors, before they are judged emotionally restricted enough to need to retreat to such an inhuman fantasy. Or maybe, out of respect for women, this technology should just be rejected.“
If many men cannot find satisfactory real women partners why stigmatize them and deny a possible substitute?
Children are comforted by stuffed animals and yet we do not pathologize that and threaten to take their dolls away.
Women use very popular vibrator and dildo sex toys and it is taken to be normal.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -objectify
- Stewie studmuffin
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:47 am
- Location: Southside Virginia. A place where the men are men and the horses are nervous.
- Contact:
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
If there's anything that should be rejected, it's the sort of radical feminist diarrhea excreted by the writer of this article.Dollicio wrote:The following article appearing in The Guardian takes an extremely harsh and contemptuous view of men who wish to have a sex doll or robot companion.
Quote: “Maybe people who want to buy sex robots need to present the agreement of a couple of doctors, before they are judged emotionally restricted enough to need to retreat to such an inhuman fantasy. Or maybe, out of respect for women, this technology should just be rejected.“
I have read this article several times and I still don't get what her concern is.
Or some of her terminology. Such as "misogynistic sexual dysfunction." I mean, what the fuck is that? Or more specifically, how is a man being in love with a doll/sex bot misogynistic? And how is it dysfunctional? If he is able to perform sexually then nothing is dysfunctional! Then again, a radical feminist would probably view a man with a healthy sex drive as a dysfunction in itself.
On another note, it's ironic that the author views this technology as disrespectful toward women when the opposite is true. Dolls/bots actually save women from the unwanted advances of undesirable men. I mean, if more men could find satisfaction with an artificial companion, then there would be less men approaching women and making unwelcome advances. So in affect these women would be getting what they wanted. And wouldn't giving women what they wanted and attempting to make them happy be the ultimate display of respect for them? I would think so.
On the other hand, it is the doll haters who want to get rid of the very thing that would allow women to live in peace.
Girlfriends are for guys who haven't found the right doll yet.
I feel much better now that I've given up hope.
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
- Arthur1960
- Doll Visionary
- Posts: 13985
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:44 pm
- Location: Suffolk, UK
- Contact:
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=90044
Sarah
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=106417
Sophia:
viewtopic.php?f=224&t=89060
Athena:
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=93767
Monique
viewtopic.php?f=212&t=87519
Keiko
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=89419
Shuri
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=98819
- Jenra Montare
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
She isn't a feminist, she's sociopathic and monomaniacal.Stewie studmuffin wrote:If there's anything that should be rejected, it's the sort of radical feminist diarrhea excreted by the writer of this article.
Her writing style and phrasing indicate an early WWW origin, suggesting that she started down this path by "winning" some arguments on Usenet or AOL chat... Usenet, with a rapid transition to online fora like this one. Poor self-image, despite being attractive when she was young, ended up adopting the notions of more hostile anti-social groups online and carried that over to a professional career. Only writes controversial opinion pieces, doesn't know anything else, doesn't care to know. Single? Single. Lives alone, spends most of her free time with a few online friends, or trolling. Tidy, but not anal-retentive about cleaning, as it cuts into her time online. Works from home (apartment).
That's what I got from reading the article.
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
danDub wrote:Sex dolls take away a woman’s sexual control over a man that’s why she and many others dont like them as there is no empowerment over a man, seeing as she mentions doctors she might want to book an appointment
I agree with this
- The Messenger
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 9:16 pm
- Location: california
- Contact:
Re: At last, a cure for feminism: sex robots
There is so much more to sex than just how men perceive or act towards women.
I'm sure that as dolls become more and more mainstream the subject will be used to incite the battle of the sexes.
The subject is perfect for this kind of shallow journalism.
Personally it took some time for me to become an mgtow, for lack of a better term.
That fact sparked my plunge into doll ownership.
I'm sure for others, it's a completely different thing.
There are members here with wives and girlfriends.
Admittedly, doll sex is my only sex.
But even for a guy like me, dolls do not replace women in my life.
Just because you love coffee doesn't mean that you hate tea.
What in life is that black and white?
Shallow journalism, written to incite people and make money is one.
Yeah I know there are women haters out there, just like there are man haters.
It's got nothing to do with dolls, or why some people are into them.
To those people that are offended or angered by the very existence of dolls.
I suggest that you avoid the subject and move on with your life.
It's a big wide world out there full of many things to be happy about.
Go find one of those things for you.