H.R. silicone 170 with C33(A29) head

Post by **Booty Call Dolls** » Thu Aug 15, 2019 3:13 am

fakeid123,
It might be the angle since it is not a straight on view from behind so sort of the train track illusion.
Hopefully another picture can show it better
V/r
Jeff

WaffleAnomaly · Post by **WaffleAnomaly** » Thu Aug 15, 2019 6:34 pm

I'm not usually a fan of such thiccness but I have to say she looks absolutely stunning!

Post by **Hitdoll** » Thu Aug 15, 2019 10:23 pm

WaffleAnomaly wrote:I'm not usually a fan of such thiccness but I have to say she looks absolutely stunning!

Then you must go to other threads in our section and I am sure you will find your preference.

Kevin

RogerSmith · Post by **RogerSmith** » Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:28 am

Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.

bcdedit · Post by **bcdedit** » Fri Aug 23, 2019 6:19 pm

Stunning indeed. These are nice even for glamor shots. The proportions look very enticing and I'm very interested in raw and placement pics.

RamonWarhelmet · Post by **RamonWarhelmet** » Fri Aug 23, 2019 7:18 pm

bcdedit wrote:I'm very interested in raw and placement pics.

One of the things that sold me on Hitdoll was the fact that they have unedited factory shots of the different body types on their website along with the standard glamour shots. Made everything seem that much more honest and up front.

Post by **Hitdoll** » Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:44 pm

Yes. To show the products originally is just what we aim to. No tricks, no liars. It is basic in business that customers are able to see what they are going to get.
Glad you appreciate it Ramon. And bcdedit, please let me know if you want to see parts of the H.R. silicone 170.

Kevin

bcdedit · Post by **bcdedit** » Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:31 am

Hitdoll wrote:And bcdedit, please let me know if you want to see parts of the H.R. silicone 170.

Yes, I'd very much like to see parts of the 170 silicone or TPE. I'm really interested to see the anatomical placements and general factory pics. Please link the pics if they are already out there. In fact I am torn between the 151 and 170 at the moment.

Post by **Hitdoll** » Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:30 am

It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Wed Aug 28, 2019 8:45 pm

RogerSmith wrote:Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.

Actually, ancient Greek and Roman statues never had boobs that big. But, she does have some nice body mass, and some classic curves.

I was actually just looking for 3d scans of classic to renaissance sculptures to suggest for a future doll build.

Post by **Hitdoll** » Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:02 pm

Colonel Angus wrote:
RogerSmith wrote:Beautiful, like a Greek statue with a Chinese face.
Actually, ancient Greek and Roman statues never had boobs that big. But, she does have some nice body mass, and some classic curves.

I was actually just looking for 3d scans of classic to renaissance sculptures to suggest for a future doll build.

Even so, the sculp still needs some adjustment.

Kevin

bcdedit · Post by **bcdedit** » Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:08 pm

Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin

Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.

Post by **Hitdoll** » Fri Aug 30, 2019 5:25 am

bcdedit wrote:
Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin
Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.

Though it is not the doggy pose, I think the photos may show how the placement is.

: 8cc978599ad9b232a36a5e2cff88905.jpg (3.43 MiB) Viewed 2437 times

: b78e9bad02c59e84f095538cff1247f.jpg (3.32 MiB) Viewed 2437 times

.

: f76e093c98f34c886350b70dc8b33cd.jpg (3.42 MiB) Viewed 2437 times

Kevin

Colonel Angus · Post by **Colonel Angus** » Fri Aug 30, 2019 2:10 pm

Hitdoll wrote:
bcdedit wrote:
Hitdoll wrote:It is quite a big cross between 151 and 170. There are two things concerning your decision, preferred head and weight. Please let me know what angels you want for the photos.

Kevin
Yup there way different, and I like each of them for their respective qualities.

As this thread is for the 170, it'd be great to see doggystle positions where the back isn't arched too aggressively, showcasing the love hole placements.
Though it is not the doggy pose, I think the photos may show how the placement is.
8cc978599ad9b232a36a5e2cff88905.jpg

b78e9bad02c59e84f095538cff1247f.jpg
.
f76e093c98f34c886350b70dc8b33cd.jpg
Kevin

You guys are planning on updating the anus opening to look more realistic, aren't you?