Doll Confiscation by Canadian Border Patrol??

dolllover · Post by **dolllover** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 7:44 pm

I found this article a couple days ago, and am now just getting the opportunity to post it. Needless to say, I found this to be VERY disturbing, as I own two Classic TB's (my sweet little Tina and Katie (Lisa))!! I live in the US, but in this article, "they" (Canadian authorities) are supposedly in contact with "international law-enforcement". What the heck? Also, at first, I thought the individual in question, was in possession of "child pornographic material", such as magazines, or maybe self-made/taken photos of 'real' kids or something like that. After several re-reads of the article, it does not appear so. Comments are also 'closed' for this article. I feel the need to contact the C.B.P. (Canadian Border Patrol), to try & get clarification, and/or followup details and information on this case, of which I have found none as of yet. I have several "points of defense" for this poor 47 yr. old man. One of which would be if he simply could not afford a taller (and MUCH more expensive doll), which I personally do happen to own (my realdoll, Lia), along with my smaller TB's. I personally do not use my TB classic dolls for sex, but that is simply my personal choice, as it rightly should be for those who do use them for sex. Anyone on this forum who is a Canadian citizen might chime in here and help all of us out on this thread, as that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundl ... -1.1347551

Bilbo Baggens · Post by **Bilbo Baggens** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:17 pm

I wonder if this was a usa, canada working together, part of this homeland security. They said that the doll was about 50inchs. and foamy material, with school girl outfit, there is one company in usa, 1st-PC, 'that fits that doll, kiki, 4foot 2inchs. foamy, and looks young. I'am not sure if it was , I wish him well

Kinkuro · Post by **Kinkuro** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:28 pm

Yeah this definitely raises some issues. I mean I think this might be taking this a bit to far, It looks like they took the height of the doll and the fact it was wearing a school girl outfit and said it was child porn. Do we have any idea what kind of doll it was?

Barbarous · Post by **Barbarous** » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:32 pm

This article is from March 13, 2013 and was first posted here http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... nd#p534976
Thanks for bringing it to the attention of anyone that had not seen it.

dolllover · Post by **dolllover** » Wed Oct 02, 2013 9:00 am

Thank you Barbarous, for linking to an earlier post/thread on this forum RE: this article. I did a search for it yesterday, and nothing came up, so sorry guys, for a duplicate thread. I'll be posting on the original thread, if it's still active.

TDF_Management · Post by **TDF_Management** » Wed Oct 02, 2013 11:40 am

This is the link to the discussion thread: http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=206&t=46085

As we don't need two threads about the subject, this one will be locked.