My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:54 pm
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
- setevoltas
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8252
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:03 am
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
- dolls to the wall
- Active Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
Thanks! Her tops/bra/skirts are a small. And her undies are a medium. However, I'm thinking that her undies should really be a small. I just didn't want to leave impression marks with undies that were too tight. But I really don't think that it'd be an issue. Just make sure that her clothes are stretchy! And white lol unless you will be soaking out all of the color dyes in the sink.blackmamba20 wrote:she's beautiful. I was wondering what size clothes does she wear? I'm saving to get my own doll and the yl 165 is the one I'm thinking about getting.
Actually quite the opposite. So yes, more back arch = more vertical vag...BUT there does seem to be a "sweet spot". Where, if you actually extend the legs out a bit at the thigh/hip joint (counter intuitive I know), and adjust the back after, it's literally perfect. So I think that it just takes some "toying" with. And no prob about the sharing.avante wrote:Thanks for posting these! And good explanation. The doggy style position leaves me a bit mixed feeling tho. On the one hand I am glad to see it can be done. On the other hand the back arch is already bend quite allot to me, and also her legs are already pushed quite a bit forward, so I bet this is about the best achievable, and putting the back a little more 'normal' would make it hard/impossible to enter, right? But overall just thanks for posting these, at least they finally show us (not owners) the position!
Thanks! And yea, I was in the same boat at first, then I saw it coming before flipping her over, and I was like "oh damn" lolsetevoltas wrote:That doggy tutorial is fantastic man. I was kind of thinking fetal position on her side and then flip, but that wasn't accounting for the forearms/ wrists/ fingers. Thanks for the tips.
Gotta watch those fingers! They're a bitch...I swear, they'll break while your doll is in a suspended alien gravity field and your asleep...lol
But they are also an easy fix.
Body: YL165, Head: WM#15
_____________________________________________________________
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
Ahh yeah come to think of it, that does to apply to my own girl....just to be sure with extend do you mean like move to the sides (like wider stance) or something else? Sounds good tho!
Honestly I think this is the 1 million dollar question about this doll for a lot of the potential buyers! It's my nr 1 concern for her, with the 2nd being her waist is quite skinny especially compared to her ass/hip size! So how's your take on that!? I mean I bet it would be awesome view especially in doggy , but does it ever 'look unnatural or a tad bit much' to you?
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
- dolls to the wall
- Active Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
Sorry for such a late reply (been swamped lately)avante wrote:"Actually quite the opposite. So yes, more back arch = more vertical vag...BUT there does seem to be a "sweet spot". Where, if you actually extend the legs out a bit at the thigh/hip joint (counter intuitive I know), and adjust the back after, it's literally perfect. So I think that it just takes some "toying" with. And no prob about the sharing."
Ahh yeah come to think of it, that does to apply to my own girl....just to be sure with extend do you mean like move to the sides (like wider stance) or something else? Sounds good tho!
Honestly I think this is the 1 million dollar question about this doll for a lot of the potential buyers! It's my nr 1 concern for her, with the 2nd being her waist is quite skinny especially compared to her ass/hip size! So how's your take on that!? I mean I bet it would be awesome view especially in doggy , but does it ever 'look unnatural or a tad bit much' to you?
By extend I mean, her legs could be folded more than they were in the pics. This would result in setting her butt farther out and slightly more up.
As for her proportions, her waist is actually perfect. It does seem very thin from some angles, but looking straight on, it's basically perfect (IMO). She is probably one of the most realistically proportioned dolls I've ever seen.
One of the pics that shows what I mean is this one:
Heck, I've seen girls walking around my UNI campus with more drastic proportions than this
Body: YL165, Head: WM#15
_____________________________________________________________
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
- Celtic_Babog
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:07 am
- Location: Ireland
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
Review of Irontech 160cm silicone doll.
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
I'm glad that you like our model If you have any questions about the doll please drop me a line and I'll anwser any question you might have. Be sure that we can offer you also a nice TDF disscountCeltic_Babog wrote:Thank you so much for making this thread, im about to buy this model and it has been a ton of help!
-
- Ex-Member
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:49 am
- Incognito Guy
- Active Member
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 6:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
-
- Ex-Member
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:49 am
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
This is still close to perfect model for me, and I am always tempted when I see her again, just still having doubts about doggy with allot of guys claiming it cannot be done before, but kinda never feel like taking a $$$ risk on something that could be a game changer. I'd really hate to order and find out I cannot do her doggy.
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
Hi, I decided to get a YL165 due to the excellent doggie tutorial in this thread. Sadly, it did not work so well for me If anyone has doggy working with this model could you give me some additional tips?dolls to the wall wrote:Here are the steps to pose her. lol For all the potential buyers.
...
Step 9: Everything pretty much lines up flat and vertical:
(It should be noted, that in (step 2 and step 7) her legs and back are not totally bent, meaning that her vag could probably come out a bit more).
...
This should settle the placement questions.
I had the legs pushed up very far, almost knees to chest. The vag swung out more but was still tucked under too much. I'm not short in length and was able to penetrate a little but it wasn't good at all. Just could not hit it deep whatsoever.
I appear to be missing something critical. Is her spine flexible so one can pull up on her neck while holding her lower back down, getting it to bend backwards? I didn't want to try something potentially damaging without asking here first.
The only other idea of what could be wrong is my mattress - she was sinking into it much more than the tutorial photos. Does a flat surface work better?
Thanks for any help you guys can provide. Dat juicy ass is just too fuckin' fine to not have doggy to work!
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: My YL 165 cam e in...And it's not what I expected...
So yeah I guess you could put a bunch of pillows or stuff under her, but still the canal itself might be shitty orientated/not much you could do, but to try such thing is best advise I can give. That and don't pay major $$$ to find out if a doll has correct'ish loveholes but in hindsight is always 20/20 easy
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465