WM166C real life original girl?

Andrew_Dark · Post by **Andrew_Dark** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:07 pm

I once complained in a thread about the unrealistic thin hips of the WM166C.
I think I must take that back now!

Please have a look at this pretty Russian girl that I found on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/valentivitell/

Is she the girl the WM166C is a clone of? Stunning!

/Andrew

adelea · Post by **adelea** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:16 pm

Oh, she is rather tasty!

Maviarab · Post by **Maviarab** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:16 pm

Not even close no.

Valenti Vitell (who is stunning yes) is 5'8 with a 32/22/34 figure.

The 166 is 5'5 with a 32/21/33 figure. Not being pedantic, but while similar, height and overall proportion go a long way in how a woman looks. And while the waist is similar, Valenti is rather unique in her waistline (and overall very thin figure), but does go to show these ridiculous waists are out there, though not overly common.

I'm still to find a doll with the exact measurements of some of my favourite models etc. Some come close but still miss the mark somewhere, especially in height.

Mr Franz · Post by **Mr Franz** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:39 pm

Little too much coffee today, Mav?

Maviarab · Post by **Maviarab** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:44 pm

Mr Franz wrote:Little too much coffee today, Mav!

I just know about her....so was quite a handy post....I mean...not like I stalk the poor girl or anything you know....but she is one of my fave Insta models

Andrew_Dark · Post by **Andrew_Dark** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 1:52 pm

When I wrote Stunning I meant that IMHO she was stunningly thin as the WM166C

But I still think that's too thin for my taste. Real girl or doll.
Please make me a light weight clone of Barbara Palvin and I (and my pretty Elaine ) will be happy

/Andrew

Dolllover2019 · Post by **Dolllover2019** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 3:45 pm

bring her to me! I command it!

Out_Of_Sync · Post by **Out_Of_Sync** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:19 pm

Besides having proportions similar to a doll she also has that expressionless blank stare of a doll in most of her photos. What head number is that anyway? Some good posing and dressing ideas for your doll photos.

Panther68 · Post by **Panther68** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:31 pm

Anna Konchakovskaya

Jab · Post by **Jab** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:34 pm

To be honest a good many of the complaints about "unrealistic" body types are unfounded. There are plenty of women with "doll like" proportions and figures/faces you'd love to represent as a doll. Also the're many dolls that represent a close resemblance to women in these two subreddits.

Enjoy.
https://old.reddit.com/r/easterneuropeangirls/
https://old.reddit.com/r/LatinaCuties/

Panther68 has the idea.

Jab

Dolllover2019 · Post by **Dolllover2019** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:02 pm

She has thicker more defined (muscular) legs than the wm 166. But bring her to me anyways.

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:32 pm

: Screenshot_2019-04-26-19-26-23.jpg (1.64 MiB) Viewed 2563 times

Yes, I am more of a fan of 31.5 inch (my wife) to 34 inch hips.
Dolls however tend to have shoulders and upper torso too narrow, and the waist/torso too short.

Johnbuhr · Post by **Johnbuhr** » Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:15 am

Jab wrote:To be honest a good many of the complaints about "unrealistic" body types are unfounded. There are plenty of women with "doll like" proportions and figures/faces you'd love to represent as a doll. Also the're many dolls that represent a close resemblance to women in these two subreddits.

Enjoy.
https://old.reddit.com/r/easterneuropeangirls/
https://old.reddit.com/r/LatinaCuties/

Panther68 has the idea.

Jab

Unfounded?

Cloth sizing is an obvious and easy way to see if a doll has realistic proportions.
Although the 166C looks stunning, her waist line of 52cm is even smaller than the typical Asian XS cloth size (56-60cm). That's not a complaint, but a fact.
You'll never find (non-spandex) cloths that fit as-is especially jeans, jump suits or shirts, unless you look for children cloths (52cm waist and 33cm shoulder width, look for 8-10 year clothing).
Valenti is considered EXTREMELY thin and she has a waist line of 57cm, that's already quite a difference with the 166C. Also, her upper body looks much longer to me and her shoulders are wider.

Although very enjoyable indeed, none of the Latina and European girls I see on those Reddit pages come even close to doll proportions. Waist lines are obviously at least 60cm or above. Put a 166C next to any of those girls and you'll see the difference.

Maviarab · Post by **Maviarab** » Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:20 am

Agreed John...while there are women around like this...I would say to anyone....and how many do 'you personally know'....and I bet I can imaine the answer. Magazines...Instagram ladies etc etc....are not like real women.

So yes, they are incredibly unrealistic as the proportion of women who do actually have (a healthy) 20" waist is probably less than 2%.

Agalmatoreveur · Post by **Agalmatoreveur** » Sat Apr 27, 2019 1:17 pm

"Instagram Model" is one of the most heinous oxymorons I've ever come across. These women on Instagram would be laughed out of the room if they tried to join a legitimate modelling agency. This woman is no different, it's fashion, not the Weber Bros. Travelling Circus.

However, one needn't look at women like this for doll like proportions. I've known girls with the same waist/hip ratio (just not the same chest). Before I bought the 166C, I did a search to see if there were any discussions about having a 20" waist. Sure enough, there are threads on various discussion boards where various girls say their proportions are 32-20-33, or 32-20-34. Rare doesn't mean impossible.