Why is there no talk ofthis doll!!!!!?

Post by **setevoltas** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 4:05 pm

Haha... yeah we can cue Usher. You've got it bad.

Agreed about the torso being super long and weird, but the way it connects to those goddess hips somehow works. I personally love the thunder thighs on the 156. These are unique dolls for sure.

Two more things to throw in just to keep playing with your emotions.

One, I'd say that vaginal doggy style or spooning is actually where this "problem" comes into play the most. If those aren't positions that matter to you, or if you don't mind hitting her ass from behind, it doesn't matter as much.

Two, even the newer dolls with more anatomical placement are still dolls. This doesn't HAVE to be a deal breaker, it's just something to know to make an informed purchase. Of my three dolls the JY 159 is the furthest "off", but in the moment I could really give a damn. It's all personal preference.

Samuel_78 · Post by **Samuel_78** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 4:41 pm

It's personal preference. Or if you want beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Not every one likes the WM166c, the JY170h, or the YL160m. But there are people out there who do want to bring those dolls into their homes.

HoboBob · Post by **HoboBob** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:20 pm

Well I mean I plan on getting a 163 WM Hcup become thats a body I could unf... do things with for years... But when I was looking for a lighter doll to do other positions with i happen to run across this beauty and I knew I had to get her too. But with her body and attitude given off in the pictures I want to do other things with her that I am not going to be doing with the 163 WM. To be honest I want to do a bit more bondage and punishment oriented stuff...and doggy is definitely going to be part of that :3.

The more I post in this stupid forum the more I'm hyping it up for myself. Dang it now I have to know how much it would be to get this done XD. If I can get my hands on more pics to match I i think Ill make several more reference pics for it and see if I can get a thread up to see how many others would be interested. I can Live the dream!

sircraig90 · Post by **sircraig90** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:54 pm

I actually own this doll. Posted some non nude pics a while back: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=100096

I too was (and still am) absolutely mesmerized by her body. My preference is for large breasts, but this body is magnificent.

HoboBob · Post by **HoboBob** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:59 pm

I know right!

I love your doll! Would you mind if you still have her puting her in a standing bent over position and a position on all fours with a camera angle from directly behind her to see how accessable her naughty bits look from the beck :3 :3 :3. Almost if you're willing can you put her next to some commonly known object. Im curious how lithe she actually is in rl compare to something else. @w@

:Beams at you:

Post by **setevoltas** » Fri Jun 14, 2019 10:03 pm

Damn WM! Making us give in to odd lady bits because of these beautiful asses.

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 1:15 am

Though I find my IT 155cm has realistic love hole placement I´d some issues with that initially nonetheless. Reason was I couldn´t get her waist joint bent properly so the canal´s angle was too off for me personally. Also inner doggy (legs tight) posed some issues for the ...given tightness in that position. Could solve with the outer doggy (legs opened some), but her body could became too low or position becoming too uncomfortable for some more relaxed doings. But... once I found my technique to adapt the waist joint correctly, all my issues went away at the instant. So is there similar issues and their solutions with other brands dolls?

: tpe-dolls-upgraded-skeleton.png (110.12 KiB) Viewed 937 times

sircraig90 · Post by **sircraig90** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 3:30 am

HoboBob wrote:I know right!

I love your doll! Would you mind if you still have her puting her in a standing bent over position and a position on all fours with a camera angle from directly behind her to see how accessable her naughty bits look from the beck :3 :3 :3. Almost if you're willing can you put her next to some commonly known object. Im curious how lithe she actually is in rl compare to something else. @w@

:Beams at you:

I'll be happy to oblige when I can, HoboBob.

HoboBob · Post by **HoboBob** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:13 am

ALL THE PICTURES BWAHAHAHAHHA!

sircraig90 · Post by **sircraig90** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:33 am

Ok, here you go. As you can see, this model is not ideal for doggy style positions, unfortunately. It's a real shame, because this body type is definitely suited for it. I'm afraid she's a strictly missionary girl, but cow girl style is fantastic. Just imagine those thicc thighs wrapped around you.

Also included are some photos of Lauren in the bathroom to give you some idea of scale. Plus one of her holding a roll of toilet paper. I figured that's the one object that everyone would have laying around for comparison.

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:51 am

sircraig90 wrote:Ok, here you go. As you can see, this model is not ideal for doggy style positions, unfortunately. It's a real shame, because this body type is definitely suited for it. I'm afraid she's a strictly missionary girl, but cow girl style is fantastic. Just imagine those thicc thighs wrapped around you.

Also included are some photos of Lauren in the bathroom to give you some idea of scale. Plus one of her holding a roll of toilet paper. I figured that's the one object that everyone would have laying around for comparison.

"not ideal" is bits of an understatement. Thanks for the pics (*scrapped from my wanna have list*). Yet remain at liking that particular body build in general.

Post by **setevoltas** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:48 am

What a freaking body though! Thank you sircraig.

For the love of God WM... give us one of these thick, realistic cup shorties with anatomical holes.

HoboBob · Post by **HoboBob** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:11 pm

I can just look at this doll all day... I really dont know why it memorized me so. Its just something about how everything comes together on it. Thank you for the pictures. I find them actually much more useful then the promotional ones. Any more pictures you have or want to take I wouldnt mind...gawking at :3.

That vag placement though...ugh. I admit when I see this doll and all the things I want to do to it, doggy is high and I dare say primary on that list. It has such a perfect frame for it too @w@. There are better dolls for missionary looks wise, GAH! Thats it I am going to start a thread later (maybe tomorrow) trying to get the vag placement more doggy friendly! What kind of person makes an juicy bottom doll and makes it horrible for doggy @~@

Anung Un Rama · Post by **Anung Un Rama** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:47 pm

Then again, you do not want a doll that looks like a police horse...

that has a C@nt half way up its back right

Anung

Post by **setevoltas** » Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:10 pm

HoboBob wrote:What kind of person makes an juicy bottom doll and makes it horrible for doggy @~@

You, me, and every other ass man doll lover have been asking this for years.

I have a feeling this will become an old man at the barbershop joke for our generation. "Yeah sonny? Well I remember when WM made dolls Lex Steele couldn't hit from the back!"