50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- Xander_DL
- Active Member
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:53 am
- Location: Close to my Goddess.
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- Broven
- Doll Patriarch
- Posts: 4225
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:26 pm
- Location: The Mitten State
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
"You're my blue sky. You're my sunny day." - Dickey Betts
Anna Marie and Friends (Thindoll 162A-36)
February 2019 Coverdoll photo shoot
-
- Banned Troll
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 8:10 pm
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- Silicone Lovers
- VENDOR
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:45 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
Click for better resolution
Just wanted to say it's really helpful for customers to be able to see how much of a difference hair and make-up can make...and obviously a different head.
Thanks for sharing Mandos.
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
Thanks SL, there has been both positive and negative comments about that earlier. I try to create a look that appeals to me, and hopefully others as well, and by doing some simple changes like hair, eyes, lipstick and clothes a doll can look so very different. It is one of the most interesting things about doll ownership IMO, you never grow tired of a doll if you have enough wigs and clothes
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- Silicone Lovers
- VENDOR
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:45 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
mandos wrote:I think it is head #156. I haven’t done any photos with #56 yet, only one I have is a mobile phone photo from another thread:gingerlover05 wrote:So mandos, sorry to be a pest, but I'm just double checking. I know different wigs and make-ups can completely change a face, but I'm awful when it come to trying to identify a head number. Is this #56? She's gorgeous, but when I look at the #56's on some of the supplier websites, the eyes and mouth look very different to me. Whatever number she is, it will be on my shortlist for next purchases. Please confirm. Thanks again so much!mandos wrote:Yet another nice looking head (the wig however is a total mess and will be thrown away). I think I might try #56 on on this body next, it has not failed me yet
Aye, the weight is one of her best features. Keep in mind that it is still very much a petite doll, she would probably be dwarfed by a RealDoll. She is even tiny compared to my DS 160+, allthough they are the exact same height.stacy718 wrote:Wow, very versatile... probably the best body I've seen. Her arms are nice and normal! She'd be great to bring outside and photograph.
Hope this helps
Here are 2 x versions of Head #56 (has a soft smile)
https://www.siliconelovers.com/products ... c-sex-doll
https://www.siliconelovers.com/products ... c-sex-doll
And 2 x versions of the #156 head
https://www.siliconelovers.com/products ... c-sex-doll
https://www.siliconelovers.com/products ... c-sex-doll
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2019 7:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
My very sincerest compliments.
- sexydolltime
- Basic Poster
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 12:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
This is an awesome thread and has almost finalized my decision.
I'm stuck between the 157 and the 166 body. I keep hearing that the 157 is small, petite, that it's a more exaggerated body. However when I look at all the pictures (like in this thread) it seems pretty natural (well a models body, but still natural) and doesn't seem all that small.
This will be my first doll but I want it perfect of course. I'm wondering if anyone here has these two dolls and could get some shots of them side by side. Like a front, back, side shot of both dolls beside each other? I think if that's possible it would help me make the final decision.
I don't find the breasts to be small, I find them to appear a perfect medium size. However at the same time, at least in pictures I don't find the 166 has all that much larger breasts, they seem very similar to me. My issue is how much can I trust pictures, and how much it will change in person.
To me the 157 has better breasts and a better vagina. The 166 has a better butt and more toned stomach. If I could combine the two that would be crazy perfect. At the same time maybe a not 100% perfect doll will make it more real.
Anyways, thanks in advance.
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
What's the problem then? Would love to be 'stuck' between those twoI'm stuck between the 157 and the 166 body.
I have the same 'issue' choosing between the 2... the 166C looks stunning, but length and weight.... :/
Btw, comparison was done here, for me, the boobs of the 166C look more natural, and that belly ....
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=108667&start=255
- sexydolltime
- Basic Poster
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 12:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
You are right, I'd be happy with either, but still a hard choice.femdoll wrote:What's the problem then? Would love to be 'stuck' between those twoI'm stuck between the 157 and the 166 body.
I have the same 'issue' choosing between the 2... the 166C looks stunning, but length and weight.... :/
Btw, comparison was done here, for me, the boobs of the 166C look more natural, and that belly ....
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=108667&start=255
That's a great photo and helps, but still wish there was another of them from the side and back.
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- Woodylongstraw
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 7:25 am
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
- bigchilli
- TDF Staff Alumni
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
- Location: Bonnie Scotland
- Contact:
Re: 50 shades of beauty (New WM 157 cm)
+1Woodylongstraw wrote:NICE! Where can i find the blonds wig?