" or "beautiful"
I agree with you.Mr_Fix_it wrote:Thanks djcdoll and terabyte, And thanks to all who stopped in and had a look. A quick note to those passing through, You should consider posting some sort of reply even if it's just a thumbs up, For most of us amateur photographers feedback is the only form of currency we get for all of our efforts. It can get a bit discouraging when seemingly little interest is shown for works that deserve more.
I realize that I am no saint either and have been guilty of the same but I'm really trying to make a conscious effort to leave more feedback for others.
Thanks again and Cheers.
Thanks Tsall,Tsall wrote:You are absolutely right.
My excuses:But as you I wan't to change this and give more comments. But there are so many threads with nice photos of beautiful dolls.
- time
- writing in a foreign language <= biggest reason
- I don't wan't to write just "good" or "
- laziness
So, back to Honey and Seneca:
As I (hopefully) mentioned some time ago, I like your photos very much and I have both threads bookmarked.
Your last photo of Honey is very nice.
However, I find her skin a little reddish. Or does she have a sunburn?
djcdoll wrote: I agree with you.
It looks like its easy to just put a doll somewhere and take a few snaps with a camera, but it's not easy at all, far from it.
I fully appreciate the time, effort and skill that is taken to put these superb images together, no they're actually works of art.
In many cases it's the little details that take a nice image into the superb category.
I hope the "experts" keep posting their wonderful works of art so that I can get inspiration and learn from them to improve my own efforts.
For many of us, seeing doll photographs probably got our juices going and got us interested in getting a doll in the first place!
So thank you very much and cheers to the photographers out there.
Your thread is very inspiring! I completely agree with dropping a line or 2 or thumbs up in photo threads, feedback is always appreciated!Mr_Fix_it wrote:Thanks djcdoll and terabyte, And thanks to all who stopped in and had a look. A quick note to those passing through, You should consider posting some sort of reply even if it's just a thumbs up, For most of us amateur photographers feedback is the only form of currency we get for all of our efforts. It can get a bit discouraging when seemingly little interest is shown for works that deserve more.
I realize that I am no saint either and have been guilty of the same but I'm really trying to make a conscious effort to leave more feedback for others.
Thanks again and Cheers.
Honey looks really good in those denim shorts.Mr_Fix_it wrote:Another shot of Honey and the tree stump.
Looking back over the pages of posts, I've often wondered why I can't get lipstick to look right. I've tried major brands like Maybelline, L'Oreal, etc and they just don't want to spread evenly if at all in some places. Of course, I have a hard time keeping it on them if I do half as nice a job as has been done with Honey because I love to kiss them too often.As I stated earlier in this thread I do in-fact use actual lipstick. The method I use to apply it is similar to detail painting. I have small "makeup Brushes" that are employed for this.
Especially Rachael who has the most kissable lips in the house.(#122) Thanks for the complement ColColt, I find the brushing it on method to be the way to go. I can get flawless applications with it. I haven't tried other brands though I'm using a rather cheap set of lipsticks from Aliexpress.ColColt wrote:Looking back over the pages of posts, I've often wondered why I can't get lipstick to look right. I've tried major brands like Maybelline, L'Oreal, etc and they just don't want to spread evenly if at all in some places. Of course, I have a hard time keeping it on them if I do half as nice a job as has been done with Honey because I love to kiss them too often.As I stated earlier in this thread I do in-fact use actual lipstick. The method I use to apply it is similar to detail painting. I have small "makeup Brushes" that are employed for this.
I had to go back and look since I didn't notice the Canadian flag....and I'm Canadian! Must have been focusing on something else....or like they say Men have 2 brains and only enough blood to run one at a timedjcdoll wrote:Definitely can see why you love that last photo so much.
Honey looks gorgeous in the "Canadian" bikini.
Haha...Ya northerndollluver, I think the southern head gets the lions share in my case.northerndollluver wrote:I had to go back and look since I didn't notice the Canadian flag....and I'm Canadian! Must have been focusing on something else....or like they say Men have 2 brains and only enough blood to run one at a timedjcdoll wrote:Definitely can see why you love that last photo so much.
Honey looks gorgeous in the "Canadian" bikini.
Hi RiderKuuga, Thanks for stopping in and having a look. I'm not sure what photo you are referring to here but I think you may be asking about the "catch lights" It's a lighting technique using lights and or sometimes reflectors (just google "catch lights") for more info.RiderKuuga wrote:How are you getting the eyes to pop so much in even the lower light photos? Is it done in a photo editor program post? If so which one do you use?
OMG I really need to get around more! I came looking for this thread on page 2 then 3 and 4, finally I decided to check page 1 and Wow, What a nice surprise.stacy718 wrote:so good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
headed over to your eye candy thread now
