SM157#21

avante · Post by **avante** » Mon May 27, 2019 8:23 am

Hot last pic, and also nice video. Like the model, and also better vag position than most. Seriously doubting the 30cm shoulder width...for another model of yours I've seen re-measurements by that owner of several cm's...care to double check?

Post by **SMdoll** » Mon May 27, 2019 8:36 am

avante wrote:Hot last pic, and also nice video. Like the model, and also better vag position than most. Seriously doubting the 30cm shoulder width...for another model of yours I've seen re-measurements by that owner of several cm's...care to double check?

This is what Metricnut measured for her.
SM 157 C cup

37.9 kg / 83.5 lbs. : Measured weight.

156.5 cm / 5' 1.6" : Measured Height.

30 cm / 11.8" : Shoulder width.

81 cm / 31.9" : Breast (32 C cup bras)

65 cm / 25.6" : Under breast (16 cm step, 6.3")

62 cm / 24.4" : Waist at the smallest point of her belly.

83 cm / 32.7" : Waist at the belt line or near the top of her pants.

93 cm / 36.6" : Hips at the widest point around her butt.

79 cm / 31.1" : Inseam

21 cm / 8.3" : Foot length.

Waist to hip Ratio is : .67

curiousswede · Post by **curiousswede** » Mon May 27, 2019 9:25 am

Shoulders should be measured from where they start going down from upper arms and not just from the "knuckle" parts of the each shoulder (comparing organic shoulders). I mean, my WM168E has shoulders width at least 36 cm if I remember correctly.

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Mon May 27, 2019 10:11 am

curiousswede wrote:Shoulders should be measured from where they start going down from upper arms and not just from the "knuckle" parts of the each shoulder (comparing organic shoulders). I mean, my WM168E has shoulders width at least 36 cm if I remember correctly.

seconded. This should be the way it´s to be done.

avante · Post by **avante** » Mon May 27, 2019 11:54 am

Third-ed, I'd be amazed if that 30cm is measured this way...guess we'll have to wait for someone to verify.

Post by **SMdoll** » Thu May 30, 2019 11:36 am

More video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16HBdi1 ... p=drivesdk

Pip-Doll88 · Post by **Pip-Doll88** » Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:12 pm

Can this doll go in a squatting position?

Any measurement on the thigh circumference?

Post by **SMdoll** » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:28 pm

Her thighs are 52CM in circumference.In addition, if you choose to upgrade the skeleton, she can sit duck, we have not tried the squat position, but she should be able to do.
Star

Post by **SMdoll** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:06 am

Sidestep · Post by **Sidestep** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:50 am

She is stunning. She is in my top 3 as of one to pick for my first.

Post by **SMdoll** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:57 pm

Sidestep wrote:She is stunning. She is in my top 3 as of one to pick for my first.

Thank you!You are welcome to contact me！
Star

Post by **SMdoll** » Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:23 pm

: Screenshot_20190726_002025.jpg (369.19 KiB) Viewed 695 times

: Screenshot_20190726_002009.jpg (264 KiB) Viewed 695 times

: Screenshot_20190726_001945.jpg (274.66 KiB) Viewed 695 times

silicon · Post by **silicon** » Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:21 am

SM157cm. Bum bandits rating *****..

DoctorDuke · Post by **DoctorDuke** » Tue Oct 01, 2019 1:39 pm

These SM dolls are all so damn sexy! Such realistic sculpt to the bodies. I like the face on this 157 and her body is like a normal sexy young woman - not a fantasy figure (which are so fun as well). Hard to choose which from SM I like best now.

Post by **SMdoll** » Tue Oct 01, 2019 2:55 pm

DoctorDuke wrote:These SM dolls are all so damn sexy! Such realistic sculpt to the bodies. I like the face on this 157 and her body is like a normal sexy young woman - not a fantasy figure (which are so fun as well). Hard to choose which from SM I like best now.

Haha, thank you for liking her. Now we have preferential activities, you are welcome to consult!
Star