Why go Iron Tech

Dollicious2 · Post by **Dollicious2** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 10:05 am

Prometheus 2112 wrote:Ok thanks Jeff. Looks like you quoted someone there.

Best regards,

P2112

I can tell you one huge reason
WM dolls pussy and ass holes are huge and Irontech dolls holes are smaller at the opening , especially the anal hole , plus they dont form a huge gap when spreading the dolls legs opened wider like the WM , YL and OR dolls all do.

Personally I prefer Irontech body sculpting and realistic measurements on the body as well , clothing actually fits the body as the waistline not 20 inches unrealistic like almost every single doll Jinsan makes ,
plus they ain't afraid to make dolls without humungous breasts every stinking time.
DL2

Olivia F1 · Post by **Olivia F1** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 10:48 am

Dollicious2, I completely agree. As SEX Dolls, finally a manufacture got the Sex part right! There are so many Fantasy dolls on the market (unrealistic proportions) and what I and many others have been longing for are Natural bodies. And like you said, clothes are much easier to find that properly fit; My 163 came with the Doria head and for the first time my wigs are also fitting nicely.

Quater · Post by **Quater** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 11:25 am

Dollicious2 wrote: I can tell you one huge reason
WM dolls pussy and ass holes are huge and Irontech dolls holes are smaller at the opening , especially the anal hole , plus they dont form a huge gap when spreading the dolls legs opened wider like the WM , YL and OR dolls all do.
DL2

Does that mean that you think WM, YL and OR dolls' (fixed) vaginas in general are too loose?

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 11:56 am

Olivia F1 wrote:Dollicious2, I completely agree. As SEX Dolls, finally a manufacture got the Sex part right! There are so many Fantasy dolls on the market (unrealistic proportions) and what I and many others have been longing for are Natural bodies. And like you said, clothes are much easier to find that properly fit; My 163 came with the Doria head and for the first time my wigs are also fitting nicely.

+1

No idea about manufacturers decision making processes when it comes to doll releases. Is it just sales and most people demanding the big kind of properties? It seems to me IT responsibles stick more to their own woman body aesthetics which obviously are more geared toward natural and harmonic looking woman body outlooks. They off course have their biggies as well, but the balanced approach always shines through IMO. I hope they won´t deviate from that too much (for more sales) and also hopefully give african type bodies more attention with regard to same realism and unique body properties.

Olivia F1 · Post by **Olivia F1** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 1:16 pm

In regards to appealing to a wider market I believe IronTech has already done that by offering Plus Sizes. For example: the 163 is offered in a 163 Plus size with big breasts while maintaining a 24-25" waist.

DDebonair · Post by **DDebonair** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 1:40 pm

I want Irontech to go much thicker than their current lineup.
I mean the IT158 looks good but want them to go beyond that.
Their 160 and 170cm is too skinny in the legs.
They keep the hips in the 41-43 inch range which to me is conservative.

But if their quality is as good as some say then by all means i'll lineup.

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Sun Mar 24, 2019 2:55 pm

When it comes to sculpting the "lady parts", I've seen none better than Irontech on this voluptuous 163 Miki. It just does't get any more realistic.

avante · Post by **avante** » Mon Mar 25, 2019 4:53 pm

Yeah def. agree with CoColt here, that is one of the nicest pussy sights I've seen. Would love to see a totally ass focused set of this girl (IT 163)

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:19 pm

Yep-about as good as it gets for sure.If you let your mind wonder, this girl looks real.

ColColt · Post by **ColColt** » Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:26 pm

Not sure which girl this is but she too has some realistic lady parts.

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Mon Mar 25, 2019 6:13 pm

Olivia F1 wrote:In regards to appealing to a wider market I believe IronTech has already done that by offering Plus Sizes. For example: the 163 is offered in a 163 Plus size with big breasts while maintaining a 24-25" waist.

True!

I´d choose for the non plus models then. B-C cup sizes is most comfortably to me, particularly the IT 168.

-Ragnar66- · Post by **-Ragnar66-** » Mon Mar 25, 2019 6:21 pm

ColColt wrote:Not sure which girl this is but she too has some realistic lady parts.

+1

Not even the nicest I´ve seen from IT thus far. You can send some pics of your desired pussy permanent color layout to IT if you want something special. I think I´ll try for my second IT doll and at 100$ I think it could be worth the extra expense if you´re really that sort of pussy enthusiast.

scoll down to bottom

https://www.sexdollrealistic.com/art/se ... a0046.html