Unattractive is better?
Unattractive is better?
Most want to see vagain, face, anus and ass.
Website :www.asdolls.com
Email : info@asdolls.com
if you want to choose our doll .Please feel free to contact us .
Re: Unattractive is better?
If I understand your question correctly I would say that the one view everyone asks for (but the maker rarely provides) is a full frontal full body shot with arms straight down at the sides and nothing obscured so that the proportions can be accurately assessed.Asdoll wrote:When you buy a doll, which parts you want to have the real pictures?
Most want to see vagain, face, anus and ass.
- Panther68
- Doll Guru
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:19 am
- Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
Good morning,nicvncnt wrote:If I understand your question correctly I would say that the one view everyone asks for (but the maker rarely provides) is a full frontal full body shot with arms straight down at the sides and nothing obscured so that the proportions can be accurately assessed.Asdoll wrote:When you buy a doll, which parts you want to have the real pictures?
Most want to see vagain, face, anus and ass.
I kinda do this with my newly acquired dolls along with true measurements. I did one for the AS 168 and have one for the AS 161 that I have not posted, yet. They are my Tale of the Tape posts. My AS 161 Raven head is more the happy to show off her curves. Will post more later.
Re: Unattractive is better?
Many thanks for doing this, Panther68. These kind of pics from doll owners often provide clearer information than we get from the makers...Panther68 wrote: I kinda do this with my newly acquired dolls along with true measurements. I did one for the AS 168 and have one for the AS 161 that I have not posted, yet. They are my Tale of the Tape posts. My AS 161 Raven head is more the happy to show off her curves. Will post more later.
Re: Unattractive is better?
Londynn 164J viewtopic.php?f=11&t=146629
Naiyana162E viewtopic.php?f=11&t=134163
Jae Eun 162E viewtopic.php?f=11&t=134287
Jensen 166C viewtopic.php?f=11&t=114830
Re: Unattractive is better?
First, thank you for taking the time to ask for feedback from potential customers. I appreciate this. As to what I would like to see is non-glamour shots taken with full front, full back, side pictures, close up vagina, close up anus, and the doll bent over in the doggy position, so that we can see the hole alignment. Though I can appreciate the glamour shots, seeing the "raw" product gives us the consumer, a better overview of what we are potentially buying.Asdoll wrote:When you buy a doll, which parts you want to have the real pictures?
Most want to see vagain, face, anus and ass.
Thank you.
- Tacitus_Bartelby
- Active Member
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 6:32 pm
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
Glamour shots are nice but, in them, you're selling a fantasy. When I was shopping, what I really wanted was a close up picture of the vagina, another of its placement in relation to the anus and then a couple more full body factory shots.
If all bodies of a certain height and cup size are the same, once I decided which body I wanted, it was all about the face.
No matter what fantasy we attach to these dolls, we are buying a very expensive product and I, for one, would appreciate a few 'clinical' pics along with the playboy centerfold pics.
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23821
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
I will do my best to help AS with this.
Jeff
-princeoverit. One vendor name kept coming up as being great at helping customers walk through the process, Booty Call Dolls. So I decided I would work with them on this first purchase, and did.
-Just in timeYou could not of found a better person to help you with your first doll. Jeff /Booty call dolls, knows his stuff... One of the few members that is a vendor and a real lover of dolls. He owns quite a few dolls, and really understands the love we all share.
Re: Unattractive is better?
Re: Unattractive is better?
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:08 am
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
- jonaspersson122
- Active Member
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 2:43 pm
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
P.s. Panther I do look forward to that 161's Tale of the Tape . Right now I am pretty much @ I dont trust none of the measurements, and will not really consider a model even, unless someone actually trustworthy posts them on here. Not to bash AS (have 0 exp. with them), but seem it's way to common a practice nowadays to just post false number unfortunately.
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465
Re: Unattractive is better?
It's this kind of info we otherwise have to turn to the forums to (hopefully) find. If not then it may simply not be worth spending thousands of dollars on.
And I mean, considering there are dolls manufactured all the time, there is absolutely no excuse to NOT grab a couple of pictures of them for more informative purposes to future potential customers. You don't need a professional photographer or expensive equipment for this.
Edit: With that said I don't mean that the fancy promo-sets are bad. They just serve a different purpose of showing what is possible with the dolls.
Rei - WM 140cm D-cup #39 & #53
Nymph - DH168 80cm "Shiori"
Ku - DS Ex Lite 163cm "Kayla"
Elva & Alva - 6Ye 65cm #M5 "Mina"
- Panther68
- Doll Guru
- Posts: 5016
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 12:19 am
- Location: Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
- Contact:
Re: Unattractive is better?
Hey Avante, yes, I have had it done for a while now, just have been so back logged with getting out photos. I will get it out the is evening. So I can cross it off my list.avante wrote:In with all but Frank and Jonas most: clear front, back side pics (i like em both sitting and standing) + also the same kinda pics and/or combo pics of/with other models will be very good to make decisions off.
P.s. Panther I do look forward to that 161's Tale of the Tape . Right now I am pretty much @ I dont trust none of the measurements, and will not really consider a model even, unless someone actually trustworthy posts them on here. Not to bash AS (have 0 exp. with them), but seem it's way to common a practice nowadays to just post false number unfortunately.