Forum Rules,TOS and Privacy Policy | By visiting this website and viewing the pages within, you accept and agree to be bound by and comply with our Rules Of Conduct, Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
Galatea — named after the ancient Greek myth where Pygmalion, through his exceptional sculpting skills and deep affection for his work, brought the statue Galatea to life. As a premium silicone doll brand, we are dedicated to crafting unparalleled, hyper-realistic masterpieces. Our creations not only embody an obsessive attention to detail but also incorporate unique full-body dermal patterns, striving for lifelike authenticity in every inch of skin, making them your dream girl come true. Website:www.galateadoll.com
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2024 3:22 am
Hi,
Andromeda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_proportions
"Although the average person is 71⁄2 heads tall, the custom in Classical Greece (since Lysippos) and Renaissance art was to set the figure as eight heads tall"However, we also care about your opinions very much. We will further optimize. Please keep following.
Andromeda wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2024 2:53 am
I love the breast shapes of bodies GT03 and GT04 and the body proportions and measurements, but
- size of all your heads are too small for those bodies, most of them are even way too small.
- LHP of GT04 is … bad. For me personally a no go.
Are you seriously telling me that the proportions between head and body are balanced?
GT03-167-JS043-25.jpg (2.2 MiB) Viewed 378 times
GT04-162-JS046-15.jpg (435.45 KiB) Viewed 378 times
It looks a bit strange to me. Either the heads are too small or the neck is too long. I suspect it's a mixture of both: head too small, neck too long.
I really like the shape of the GT04 body, but the LHP is completely off.
I suppose I'm a little late to the party welcoming you, but welcome. And I approve of both the Classical brand name and the deliberate classical bodily proportions you listed in your last post in this thread. I look forward to seeing what you come up with in the wake of your launch.
"Are you seriously telling me that the proportions between head and body are balanced? "
Sorry, I'm a little bit late to the thread, but I interpreted their response as being that the proportions aren't natural, but intentionally so, to capture an aesthetic. Quoting it in a context that Stan Lee absolutely would not have predicted, as a kid I read *How to Draw Comics the Marvel Way,* which also acknowledged that character proportions aren't necessarily realistic. (The Wikipedia article Galatea cited might have been generous; 6.5 heads high is probably a more normal proportion, so the 8:1 proportions of Galatea and Marvel would both be less realistic than the 7.5:1 ratio Wiki gave.) You might like their choice, or you might not, the point is that it was a deliberate choice rather than a mistake. YMMV.
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 8:45 pm
The OEM factory of Galatea is Jin San Intelligent Technology. It is an independently operated high-end silicone brand. The positioning of Galatea is more realistic and more upscale.
Corpius wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 7:38 pm
So is Galatea a subsidiary of WM Dolls? I thought Angelkiss was supposed to be the silicone line for WM. What's the difference then between Galatea and Angelkiss?
I guess what's confusing is that both Galatea and Angelkiss have the same 167cm sculpt. So you're not the same company, except you share the same sculpts? Except it looks like Galatea's 167cm has more realistic skin details. So is it my understanding that Angelkiss is supposed to be the "budget" brand and Galatea the more expensive, "high-end" brand? Sort of like Irontech and Real Lady Doll?
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:39 pm
Sure, I will be sharing lots of photos of our lovely ladies. Stay tuned!
peachplumpear wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Welcome! I hope you’ll share factory photos of your lovely ladies in this subforum.
Hey, maybe I missed it. Do you have a chart with all body types compared side by side listing measurements (weight, height, hips, bust, etc)? Better yet, do you have a side by side comparison of all your body types in images with front, back and side standing or hanging shots? Thanks. I'm mostly interested in 163cm or shorter...
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:39 pm
Sure, I will be sharing lots of photos of our lovely ladies. Stay tuned!
peachplumpear wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Welcome! I hope you’ll share factory photos of your lovely ladies in this subforum.
Hey, maybe I missed it. Do you have a chart with all body types compared side by side listing measurements (weight, height, hips, bust, etc)? Better yet, do you have a side by side comparison of all your body types in images with front, back and side standing or hanging shots? Thanks. I'm mostly interested in 163cm or shorter...
At the web page they have all four bodies displayed besides each other hanging and rotating.
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:39 pm
Sure, I will be sharing lots of photos of our lovely ladies. Stay tuned!
peachplumpear wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Welcome! I hope you’ll share factory photos of your lovely ladies in this subforum.
Hey, maybe I missed it. Do you have a chart with all body types compared side by side listing measurements (weight, height, hips, bust, etc)? Better yet, do you have a side by side comparison of all your body types in images with front, back and side standing or hanging shots? Thanks. I'm mostly interested in 163cm or shorter...
At the web page they have all four bodies displayed besides each other hanging and rotating.
Right. I saw that and hoped there was a static image of all of them side by side. Plus I dont know which is which on the home page.
Luftmeister wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:35 pm
I bought one of your heads, and it's FANTASTIC. The quality, look, and packaging. I've got one doll on order and I can't wait.
Thank you so much for your recognition! Now just patiently wait for your goddess to arrive.
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:39 pm
Sure, I will be sharing lots of photos of our lovely ladies. Stay tuned!
peachplumpear wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Welcome! I hope you’ll share factory photos of your lovely ladies in this subforum.
Hey, maybe I missed it. Do you have a chart with all body types compared side by side listing measurements (weight, height, hips, bust, etc)? Better yet, do you have a side by side comparison of all your body types in images with front, back and side standing or hanging shots? Thanks. I'm mostly interested in 163cm or shorter...
At the web page they have all four bodies displayed besides each other hanging and rotating.
Right. I saw that and hoped there was a static image of all of them side by side. Plus I dont know which is which on the home page.
Maybe they should answer this since they seem to be around. But what I can tell is, that the (rotating) bodies are in number order from the left, starting with 01.
Galatea Doll wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:39 pm
Sure, I will be sharing lots of photos of our lovely ladies. Stay tuned!
peachplumpear wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 11:14 pm
Welcome! I hope you’ll share factory photos of your lovely ladies in this subforum.
Hey, maybe I missed it. Do you have a chart with all body types compared side by side listing measurements (weight, height, hips, bust, etc)? Better yet, do you have a side by side comparison of all your body types in images with front, back and side standing or hanging shots? Thanks. I'm mostly interested in 163cm or shorter...
At the web page they have all four bodies displayed besides each other hanging and rotating.
Right. I saw that and hoped there was a static image of all of them side by side. Plus I dont know which is which on the home page.
Attachments
GT04-162 Body Data.jpg (331.09 KiB) Viewed 45 times
GT03 Body Data.jpg (324.18 KiB) Viewed 45 times
GT02-163 Body Data.jpg (339.65 KiB) Viewed 45 times
GT01-168 Body Data (Pic).jpg (334.78 KiB) Viewed 45 times