Page 9 of 9

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:34 pm
by Djcypher1
UKBoobLover wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:29 am
bobhenry wrote:I love this app lol

Image
Image
WOW -smoking hot
She it absolutely stunning!! I love her long eyelashes. Where did you find those? Amazon?
My girl should be arriving soon and I’m definitely gonna put some sexy long lashes on her.

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 1:28 am
by Keyboard Knight
I always thought that gel with bigger breasts was not as impactful with how it feels compared to smaller sizes. Is this true with the 173h?

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2023 5:48 pm
by jocobel
Owner 173h can you say about gel tits? when doll on the bad in messioner pose tits dont go left and right side its normal?

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2023 6:26 am
by just a guy
So beautiful doll. The head doesn't look like #266, but I'm not going to argue against just saying that it doesn't. Perhaps it's the make up

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2023 10:54 pm
by war201987
Beautifull ;D

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2023 10:55 pm
by Booty Call Dolls
Any notice a trend about the 173H?

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:14 pm
by Yung47
Does any body know how the ass of this doll compares to the wm 150cm m cup doll

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 8:07 pm
by codoll
Which one would you recommend to someone else, This WM 173H or JY 169 you had before? I don't know which one to get

Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:23 pm
by The Doll Man
codoll wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2024 8:07 pm Which.......
Yung47 wrote: Does......
Hi! Welcome To Forum! :glou:
Image


★ Member Introductions:
viewforum.php?f=231



Re: Tammy 2.0 - a WM 173h

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 5:25 am
by dogmeatknepp
can you post some pics of them in bent over/doggy style without clothes? id love to see how they look since they have the gel. or does the gel make them to heavy to hang free like that?