The Doll Forum

She looks great in the doggy position.

My favourite for her is doggie position as she has a lovely shapely arse and hips which are such a turn on

Don't have a name for her yet. But here she is again in action, alongside Linda (WM 170cm M cup) in a loving embrace. What a pair of gorgeous girls. They're such a turn on I practically play with them like this every night. Enjoy

What are they whispering to one another?
"Are you tingling?"

What would you like them to say to one another?

DAMN!!! the side-shots of these ladies are just jaw droppingly hot!

Hey, if I could bother you for some measurements? Would be much appreciated!
*I've seen for some dolls that the advertised measurements are incorrect, and also often a bit incomplete like missing the under-breast size.

If you would be willing and able, could you measure the breast, under-breast, taile, waist and height?

Nice arse , what is her butt and boobs measurement ?

She (WM 170 copy) measures:
20in slimmest waist
22in base of breasts
36in max around breasts, title to title
36in max at hips
159cm head to base of heel
165cm to tip of the

Sorry for mixing units (I'm an engineer)

Not quite 170cm but big enough.
Regards

Thanks man! Exactly what I was hoping for.

Haha but for reference, could you maybe give the same info on the WM-170?

EDIT:ah kinda read it wrong. but still: does the WM-170 differ at any measurements?

I'm in bed with both these hot chicks now (in the UK). Will get those measurements off the genuine WM 170 M cup tomorrow.
Nite

Morning, we'll now. Jiggled with Linda ( WM 170) to get her measurements. She didn't mind as she felt good about showing off her full figure
23in below breast, same as slimmest waist
39in max bust
39in max hips
165cm head to base of heel
175cm to tip of the
X

Ok so overall just little over the stats, except the waist...which is even slimmer, for me a little to slim. It's already quite hard to get tight-waist clothes for the WM-0158 which is about 58-59cm

DollAfficionado wrote:She looks great in the doggy position.

agreed , that round ass just look inviting

Whilst this WM 170 copy doll has a lovely pair of love holes, I still think that they're not designed to be at the right place. I've rejigged their locations in the attached pics.

I think that the love holes can be better relocated some 2in further down and along the crotch. That looks far more realistic and would make love-making more authentic too.

Any views, from the manufacturers?

I stumbled upon Darcia Lee in doggie which is just how my girl has posed for me, see the comparison!