Page 3 of 5
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 1:18 pm
by Reggster
@Zelex
Is there a photo of the SLE 171C for this thread?
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 5:51 pm
by haremlover
I'm about to do a review of a SLE164G
From initial photos the LHP of the 164 looked better than the 172 upon which I commented that the holes appeared too close together and so chose the 164 as a better option. However, I have a fundamental problem with dolls where the anus goes north rather than at an angle tangential to the bum crack.
Dolls are not humans and cannot manoeuvre as a person to accommodate you. Therefore the best hole for use from the rear, especially with a spooning position, is the rear hole and from a spooning position the angle needs to be half of the right-angle going inwards, not just upwards. I wish manufacturers would take notice.
However few dolls are entirely perfect although I have one special one in mind: there are very few which are not a compromise one way or the other. The material of this doll may be exceptionally good for cuddling and being next to in bed.
Best wishes
Harem
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:48 pm
by javo0666
Corpius wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 7:36 pm
cycleingking wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 2:04 pm
Ive been doing some research. I am really trying to get clear definitive info on the LHP situation. What's your take from this new set of photos?
172E
172cm Standing LHP.jpeg
172cm Arch LHP 1.jpeg
172cm Arch LHP 2.jpeg
NVM, I take it back. Based on those pictures and the amount of back arch...not that good.
For example, the below are what I'd consider god-tier/amazing LHP (notice the lack of an arched back needed for them).
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183304.png
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183321.png
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183401.png
Oh my… which one is the second?
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:53 pm
by Feirmor
haremlover wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 5:51 pm
I'm about to do a review of a SLE164G
From initial photos the LHP of the 164 looked better than the 172 upon which I commented that the holes appeared too close together and so chose the 164 as a better option. However, I have a fundamental problem with dolls where the anus goes north rather than at an angle tangential to the bum crack.
Dolls are not humans and cannot manoeuvre as a person to accommodate you. Therefore the best hole for use from the rear, especially with a spooning position, is the rear hole and from a spooning position the angle needs to be half of the right-angle going inwards, not just upwards. I wish manufacturers would take notice.
However few dolls are entirely perfect although I have one special one in mind: there are very few which are not a compromise one way or the other. The material of this doll may be exceptionally good for cuddling and being next to in bed.
Best wishes
Harem
I would love to see a full review over the 164G with unboxing and comments on LPH. Thats the one I've been lookin at and haven't really seen a lot of topics on it so seeing this gives me hope!
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2023 11:57 pm
by LoveFool882
Reggster wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2023 1:18 pm
@Zelex
Is there a photo of the SLE 171C for this thread?
Not sure if the mods will object, but this is a link from a non-TDF site. However, it's officially listed on Zelex's site as a distributor.
Anyway, here's the LHP for the 171C:
https://www.--Non-verified Vendor--/wp-conte ... ZX171C.jpg
Yeah, sure enough, it's not showing up. I can't find that pic in the usual store sites.
Second edit:
Not exactly what you asked for, but here:
Despite what the link says, this is 100% a 171C.
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:23 pm
by cycleingking
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 3:15 am
by Mamilla
If only they had like different molds.. this doesn't look inviting to me
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:00 am
by haremlover
For a doll, looks functionally excellent. Can't miss it in action . . .
Best wishes
Harem
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:40 pm
by Birdcaller
I haven't tried it yet as she’s on the way, my ZX160J. She’ll be my first doll. How in the hell can any reputable company not have perfect, or nearly so, LHP on a sex doll, regardless of any other uses of the doll.
I am seriously looking forward to this doll. I’ve heard so much good of Zelex’s SLE series, regardless of size, LHP should be a top priority.
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2023 9:28 pm
by King Solo
Birdcaller wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 8:40 pm
I haven't tried it yet as she’s on the way, my ZX160J. She’ll be my first doll. How in the hell can any reputable company not have perfect, or nearly so, LHP on a sex doll, regardless of any other uses of the doll.
I am seriously looking forward to this doll. I’ve heard so much good of Zelex’s SLE series, regardless of size, LHP should be a top priority.
Asian men are primarily missionary humpers .... so yeah, there's that to contend too.
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:44 pm
by Inkosi Enkhulu
That thick 160 J looks incredible.
It's about time Zelex focussed on curvy dolls and not those flat silicone girls.
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:25 am
by nahmot
Corpius wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 7:36 pm
cycleingking wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2023 2:04 pm
Ive been doing some research. I am really trying to get clear definitive info on the LHP situation. What's your take from this new set of photos?
172E
172cm Standing LHP.jpeg
172cm Arch LHP 1.jpeg
172cm Arch LHP 2.jpeg
NVM, I take it back. Based on those pictures and the amount of back arch...not that good.
For example, the below are what I'd consider god-tier/amazing LHP (notice the lack of an arched back needed for them).
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183304.png
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183321.png
Screenshot 2023-11-02 183401.png
If it doesnt break any forum rules could you please say what models those are in your pics? you can PM me the answer if you prefer thanks
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2023 1:00 am
by cycleingking
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2023 1:40 am
by setevoltas
I'm 5'11. If I want to get the 160J vag standing, she's gotta be bent forward at about a 45 degree angle from straight up.
If she were TPE, I'd widen the vag "up" JUST a little bit for comfort. I don't really dare to modify silicone, so I'll live with it.
The legit inner/ outer labia is totally awesome.
Re: LHP photos of the SLE series
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2023 1:57 am
by Cameramike
Nice information keep updating us thanks
