The Doll Forum

I have a feeling that I've met a Jarliet lady before and if I'm right then the TPE of these dolls is something special - a real feeling that's very good indeed.

So I'm still looking at them.

So I asked Jarliet which models they really like . . . and they suggested these . . .
157cm 164cm 166cm 170cm 172cm Meanwhile I wonder if two others might deserve attention
160 36kgs and 170 40kgs Which would you go for?

Best wishes

Harem

If I could choose just one to join the BCD Girl staff, it would be this body below

Purely going off looks alone...I would also say the 160 myself.

Jarliet really don't give the opportunity for easy decisions.

The lower weight 170 is really sexy, the 160 is wonderful and the 164 might possibly be the most realistic . . . or is it?

Best wishes

Harem

Was torn between 164cm and 170cm 40kg, but voted for 164cm in the end because her muscle definition looks better than her sister.

Why is Kimberly not on the list, 153 cm?

Mcupplease wrote: Why is Kimberly not on the list, 153 cm?

Yes - Jarliet do do some outsize ladies in one way or another but I focus on figures which are "normal" and not unavoidably associated with sexdoll connotations. There's a thread about whether people are ashamed or proud of their doll and being a normal sculpture means that a doll can pass as art on display in a home.

In due course I'll have a look at their sexdoll range of figures and might do a poll appropriately.

The other area on which I'd caution is that for me, however outsize the breasts, 153, 155, 156 is on the side of small. I have a wonderful silicone JM156 but cannot avoid a feeling that she's not a proper woman because she's not my norm in height. Live ladies are alive, even if that height, so such a basic feature of height is quite overlooked. But an inanimate doll being the essence or abstraction of only partial qualities that are human has to have those qualities in abundance. Not that this Jarliet model is lacking in some . . .


Here are the outsize candidates: Best wishes

Harem

too bad you missed the 155cm A cup, since she would be among my personal favorites. Id´voted

155cm A cup 71 lbs
160cm / 36 kg

instead.

While I like rather smaller breasted gals, she has quite a gorgeous butt from what I´d seen.

Here are the others in that range Not my favourites but they have something for everyone.

Best wishes

Harem

Harem,
Thank you for starting this thread.
They do have a quite a variety of shapes and sizes to choose from.
I would suggest they consider making an exact replica of their 148 in a 163 CM height.
Best,
Jeff

haremlover wrote:Here are the others in that range

Not my favourites but they have something for everyone.

Best wishes

Harem

thanks! The 156cm is a beauty too and at a good weight. My Izabel is at 30kg so I know I can handle it well. The 158cm / 32kg is quite to my tastes too.

I voted for this doll.
Supermodel measurements in a medium tall package. With a reasonable weight.

But yeah, the 158cm/32kg would be my no. 2.

dxc wrote:I voted for this doll.

Supermodel measurements in a medium tall package. With a reasonable weight.

Aah! You've answered my confusion.

The bent posture in the official photo is confusing


This is why I've been driving Eartha nuts with queries about this one Best wishes

Harem

Currently in the poll of "realistic" shaped sculptures the 160 at 36kgs is clearly in the lead, head and shoulders and more in front of the nearest competitors, the 164 and 166.

Is this on account of lower weight? Idealised figure? Would the 164 be the winner if lower weight?

Best wishes

Harem