Asking for Western Face+Body from Sino-doll?

dbenzguy · Post by **dbenzguy** » Sun May 03, 2020 5:30 pm

Doll Master wrote:
Aeron wrote:Any images showing how the 164's vagina placement compares to the 162?
This is all I can find.

I would also like to see if the LHP is correct on this doll... everything else seems to be

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Sun May 03, 2020 5:40 pm

I think the 164 is too much like the 162. The LHP seems identical. I will have to continue to wait for a 168-172 cm doll without oversized mammaries and 'fantasy curves'...

If only Sino doll would make a 172 with c cups and slim it down so that it looks like a 20 year old girl instead of a 30 year old milf. I suppose it will teach me patience. The 162 is good but it's not my type - too much chest, too much hips, and LHP forward.

oktyp · Post by **oktyp** » Mon May 04, 2020 5:51 pm

Visually the two bodies looks very similar, for me its hard to see what Sino wanted to accomplish with the new body.
If someone liked this form of body, he would be fine buying 162. I guess 162 is already doing well in terms of sales but creating another similar model doesn't mean that the sales will double. I could be wrong though, maybe these small changes make a big difference for someone?

lovedolls1 · Post by **lovedolls1** » Tue May 05, 2020 6:29 pm

I agree that the two bodies seem very similar. I would probably make my choice between the two based on weight but the information provided has the weight range between 68 lbs to 81.5 lbs (31kg to 37kg) for both. I definitely don't want a doll over 75 lbs and really I would prefer under 70 lbs. So, I may have to pass on this one even tho I really like the look and design of the face and body and would like to upgrade to a silicon doll.

Does anyone out there have a Sino-doll 162 and know the actual weight with head because it is hard for to believe there is a 13 pound variation between dolls built in the same mold?

Post by **Sino-doll** » Wed May 06, 2020 6:02 am

Apology for the measurement errors and re-release 160cm body.

First of all, I, on behalf of Sino-doll, sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused by the measurement errors of the original 164cm body, which is finally confirmed to be 160cm body. Although the measurement errors were made by our new relevant colleague, all of us cannot get rid of the responsibility not to double check and confirm the result of measurement.
The updated specifications of 160cm body are as the comparison form below.]

: 图片1.png (40.42 KiB) Viewed 2135 times

I know most of you are doubtful about the differences between 160cm body and 162cm body, it will be better to provide comparison photos. This 160cm body is not created on the basis of 162cm body. On the contrary, we created the 160cm body from scratch, emphasizing details like breasts, waist, hip, etc.

: e67b76edff4c304983e7037f0fb7ae2.jpg (1.82 MiB) Viewed 2135 times

: eec963749f3018dc20d244ce9058a6a.jpg (1.93 MiB) Viewed 2135 times

BR,
Nicole from Sino-doll

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Wed May 06, 2020 11:11 am

Hi Nicole

So let me get this straight, there is no 164cm? It's the 160?

I have the 161, which is very nice, and I would want to go for a taller girl if I got another Sino. I know you have the 172, but it would be nice if there was one between the 162 and the 172, maybe a 166-168? And maybe a smaller breasted sculpt (with a natural waist and slim hips).

Best wishes

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Wed May 06, 2020 11:15 am

Sinodoll. Please rethink the design of the bodies.

You need a body LIKE THIS!

MannyCan · Post by **MannyCan** » Sat May 09, 2020 12:03 am

WHAT A GREAT WESTERN FACE!! Wow .. I really think that Sino is going to be my next doll !! Now if only you had a thinner body .. like a little more athletic. Not muscular .. just thinner.

Aeron · Post by **Aeron** » Sat May 09, 2020 1:23 am

Sinodoll wrote:Apology for the measurement errors and re-release 160cm body.

First of all, I, on behalf of Sino-doll, sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused by the measurement errors of the original 164cm body, which is finally confirmed to be 160cm body. Although the measurement errors were made by our new relevant colleague, all of us cannot get rid of the responsibility not to double check and confirm the result of measurement.
The updated specifications of 160cm body are as the comparison form below.]

I know most of you are doubtful about the differences between 160cm body and 162cm body, it will be better to provide comparison photos. This 160cm body is not created on the basis of 162cm body. On the contrary, we created the 160cm body from scratch, emphasizing details like breasts, waist, hip, etc.

BR,
Nicole from Sino-doll

These types of unposed, non-glamour photos are nice to see for comparison. The 161 doesn't get much attention anymore and it does have some problems (neck angle/length, small hands), but these photos and measurements do show off how the 161 has nicer dimensions in some areas compared to the latest bodies.

The waist is more balanced and the wider shoulder width is more realistic. It might also have more realistic vagina placement (though hard to tell from these images). In comparison, the 160/162 has small shoulders and a super narrow waist that makes it look a bit like a toy. These differences become more obvious with these types of comparison photos, which is useful.

Would be nice to see a new body that takes some of the good things in the 161 (waist, shoulders, vagina placement) and gets updated to match the latest bodies with better hand size, neck length/angle, butt, and latest heads.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sat May 09, 2020 2:40 am

Aeron wrote:
These types of unposed, non-glamour photos are nice to see for comparison. The 161 doesn't get much attention anymore and it does have some problems (neck angle/length, small hands), but these photos and measurements do show off how the 161 has nicer dimensions in some areas compared to the latest bodies.

The waist is more balanced and the wider shoulder width is more realistic. It might also have more realistic vagina placement (though hard to tell from these images). In comparison, the 160/162 has small shoulders and a super narrow waist that makes it look a bit like a toy. These differences become more obvious with these types of comparison photos, which is useful.

Would be nice to see a new body that takes some of the good things in the 161 (waist, shoulders, vagina placement) and gets updated to match the latest bodies with better hand size, neck length/angle, butt, and latest heads.

Hi Aeron

I agree regarding the unposed, non-glamour photos for comparison. I have a 161 and apart from the neck angle and length, I don't find much wrong with her. The lengths of her torso, thighs and shins are well balanced (she has a good MTV) and she has a natural-looking waist. I don't find her hands too small, especially compared to your average TPE girl.

Doll Master · Post by **Doll Master** » Mon May 11, 2020 2:45 pm

Sino doll needs to really step it up in the body design department.

Dolls that are close, but not good enough.

152 (too short)
155 (too big ass and tits)
158 (short, bad LHP)
159 (boobs too big, ass too big)
160 (looks just like the 162)
160 (don't need a male doll!)
161 (sexy, but a little short)
162 (sexy but old news!)
172 (looks old, boobs too big)

Sino doll better figure out that a taller doll with a slim and sexy body
(not like 162!) is the only thing that is going to keep them in business.

Needs to be tall and slim with sexy (tight) butt!!! (no hips too big!)

oberyn · Post by **oberyn** » Tue May 12, 2020 5:28 pm

Sino needs to go thiccer there are enough thin plain Jane dolls on the market and no silicone doll manufacturer has yet to make a true thicc big ass doll or a muscular fit doll .

MannyCan · Post by **MannyCan** » Mon May 18, 2020 1:29 am

Doll Master wrote:... If only Sino doll would make a 172 with c cups and slim it down so that it looks like a 20 year old girl instead of a 30 year old milf.

Yes please!! I love what I'm seeing as far as the realism and the features.

BUT YOU NEED ONE LIKE THIS!! A LITTLE THINNER AND MORE YOUTHFUL.

TOTAL AGREE!!!! Size 160cm with a THINNER STOMACH would be nice.
Notice I said THINNER .. not just FLATTER.

Thinner = left/right
Flatter= front/back

THINNER please.

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Mon May 18, 2020 3:56 am

oberyn wrote:Sino needs to go thiccer there are enough thin plain Jane dolls on the market and no silicone doll manufacturer has yet to make a true thicc big ass doll or a muscular fit doll .

I certainly think that a nice muscular silicone doll would be nice

166 to 168cm.

HornedPear · Post by **HornedPear** » Mon May 18, 2020 8:49 am

Doll Master wrote:Sinodoll. Please rethink the design of the bodies.

You need a body LIKE THIS!

Doll 1.png (7.02 MiB) Viewed 1772 times

+1. I would love to have the opportunity to give you my money for a doll like this in the 155-165cm range. I would prefer the breasts be smaller, I like A cups, but I'd be willing to compromise for a sculpt like that.