The Doll Forum

pecial note: 160H is adjusted on the basis of 160G.

160H is based on the original mold basic design of 160G, with individual position adjustments and upgrades, adding more details and features.

Make her overall more symmetrical and sexy.We adjusted the chest, waist, hips and thighs. Added more detailed skin texture.

You can feel that the 160H is just right fat in appearance.

Of course, the softness of her body is better. The breasts and buttocks also have better elasticity.

Good job XTDoll, I love the look! You are one of a very few brands that take weight reduction seriously too, because this doll is only 31 KG! Which is absolutely incredible for her size. Once again, your brand rocks .
edit:
Do you have more pictures of the LHP? There is only one on your website and not from the best angle.

Looks great

Those who like chubby girls will definitely like her very much.

To watch the 160H detail video please click:https://xtdoll.com/index.php/2024/03/13 ... y-details/

Excellent!

I just ordered the 160G just a week between my order and this post.

Edit: Just watched the video of the doll. The weight is 31.5kg. Now I am not sad any longer, the lower weight of the older version is better for me.

thazehase wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:47 am I just ordered the 160G just a week between my order and this post.

Edit: Just watched the video of the doll. The weight is 31.5kg. Now I am not sad any longer, the lower weight of the older version is better for me.

In fact, we can make it lighter, but we have found the critical value of feel and quality under the premise of being light and soft. So we chose the most appropriate weight.

LOL. I think there might be cultural differences in the definition of "chubby". Here in my region of the US we'd say "full-figured" or "voluptuous". Chubby is borderline fat or "Heavy". That said, the 160H vs the 162G at the same weight is making it a hard choice! Looking forward to the availability.

Thank you! This is what I've been wanting to see in the XT lineup. I assume the lhp is like on the 160g?

PartThree wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:24 am LOL. I think there might be cultural differences in the definition of "chubby". Here in my region of the US we'd say "full-figured" or "voluptuous". Chubby is borderline fat or "Heavy". That said, the 160H vs the 162G at the same weight is making it a hard choice! Looking forward to the availability.

That's right, full-figured" and "voluptuous.

I see this is available on one of the resellers and lists the head as #31. Is this a new head? Oral capable?

I took a look at the photos on the XTDoll site and I found something we have to talk about. I think that eighter the photo is taken in a way that does not show the crotch area propperly, or the area is laking in design.

thazehase wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:18 pm I took a look at the photos on the XTDoll site and I found something we have to talk about. I think that eighter the photo is taken in a way that does not show the crotch area propperly, or the area is laking in design.
7W2A7671-13.jpg

Yes, I saw this doll today and thought to myself "Where is the butthole?" also, the vagina is dented in; other than that, I think the doll looks good and I might get this doll next, but only if XTDoll improves it.

thazehase wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:18 pm I took a look at the photos on the XTDoll site and I found something we have to talk about. I think that eighter the photo is taken in a way that does not show the crotch area propperly, or the area is laking in design.
7W2A7671-13.jpg

What IS that? A photo from straight on would help. I agree, that doesnt look right.